Trade in Food: Regulatory and Judicial Approaches in the EC and the WTOTrade in Food surveys and explores the evolution of the European Community's regulation of food within the broader framework set out by the WTO Agreements. Its main purpose is to provide readers keen to deepen their knowledge of the field with easy access to the EC and WTO food laws accompanied by a critical explanation and commentary. The book is suitable for legal practitioners, judges, policy-makers, officials of international organizations as well as post graduate students of international trade law and policy, international and European economic law, global administrative law and risk regulation. |
From inside the book
Page 20
... Agreement FVO Food and Veterinary Office GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GI Geographical Indication GMO EFSA Panel in Genetically Modified Organisms GMOs Genetically Modified Organisms IGTF Codex Ad-Hoc Intergovernmental ...
... Agreement FVO Food and Veterinary Office GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GI Geographical Indication GMO EFSA Panel in Genetically Modified Organisms GMOs Genetically Modified Organisms IGTF Codex Ad-Hoc Intergovernmental ...
Page 25
... that European restrictions (notably, the EC general moratoria, the product specific moratoria and the national bans) on the importation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) violate WTO rules, notably several SPS provisions.
... that European restrictions (notably, the EC general moratoria, the product specific moratoria and the national bans) on the importation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) violate WTO rules, notably several SPS provisions.
Page 105
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 109
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 118
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
IX | 33 |
X | 51 |
XI | 53 |
XII | 61 |
XIII | 71 |
XIV | 73 |
XV | 161 |
XVII | 169 |
XXXVIII | 293 |
XXXIX | 297 |
XL | 307 |
XLI | 313 |
XLII | 317 |
XLIII | 319 |
XLIV | 332 |
XLV | 346 |
XVIII | 173 |
XIX | 183 |
XX | 210 |
XXI | 216 |
XXII | 222 |
XXIII | 225 |
XXIV | 227 |
XXV | 231 |
XXVI | 234 |
XXVII | 239 |
XXVIII | 241 |
XXIX | 242 |
XXX | 244 |
XXXI | 258 |
XXXII | 274 |
XXXIII | 275 |
XXXIV | 280 |
XXXV | 289 |
XXXVI | 290 |
XXXVII | 291 |
Common terms and phrases
adopted Animal Health Appellate Body application approach appropriate Article 2.2 Article 5.7 assessment and risk Codex Alimentarius Codex Alimentarius Commission Commission consumer contested measure contracting party Council decision developed dispute EC courts EC food EC institutions EC–Hormones EFSA EFSA’s ensure environmental established European Food Safety European Parliament food law food regulation foodstuffs framework GATT genetically modified organisms GMOs guidelines harmonisation Hormones human health internal market international standards international trade issues judicial review justified legislation level of protection organisations Panel Report paragraph particular Pfizer phytosanitary measures precautionary principle procedures public health regime regulatory rely requirements risk analysis model risk assessment risk management role sanitary and phytosanitary sanitary or phytosanitary science-based measures scientific committees scientific evidence scientific justification scientific opinions scientific uncertainty specific SPS Agreement SPS measures standard of review supra note Treaty World Trade World Trade Organization WTO judicial bodies WTO members