A Shared Research Agenda for Landuse, Landuse Change, Forestry and the Clean Development Mechanism: Developed Through an International Workshop Held 6-8 March 2001, Bogor, IndonesiaCIFOR, 2001 M01 1 - 74 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 18
Page vi
... costs was identified and set up as the main agenda for further research. Transaction costs were considered most important, given that they increase the cost of doing business, reduce the magnitude of transactions, and therefore reduce ...
... costs was identified and set up as the main agenda for further research. Transaction costs were considered most important, given that they increase the cost of doing business, reduce the magnitude of transactions, and therefore reduce ...
Page viii
... transaction costs. Better inventories are essential to address the setting of baselines, the precision and accuracy of monitoring and the measurement of leakage. In the short term, there is a particular demand for better estimates of ...
... transaction costs. Better inventories are essential to address the setting of baselines, the precision and accuracy of monitoring and the measurement of leakage. In the short term, there is a particular demand for better estimates of ...
Page 3
... costs and benefits, permanence, leakage and monitoring, and baseline/additionality issues, as described in more ... transaction costs. Permanence Permanence is the longevity of a carbon pool and the stability of carbon stocks given the ...
... costs and benefits, permanence, leakage and monitoring, and baseline/additionality issues, as described in more ... transaction costs. Permanence Permanence is the longevity of a carbon pool and the stability of carbon stocks given the ...
Page 6
... transaction costs affected by differences in institutional arrangements? What are the implications of local and national institutions for project design (individual smallholders versus collective action projects, forest plantation ...
... transaction costs affected by differences in institutional arrangements? What are the implications of local and national institutions for project design (individual smallholders versus collective action projects, forest plantation ...
Page 7
... cost LULUCF CDM projects but with high co-benefits interms of local development, poverty alleviation and ... transaction costs and sustainable development. The bilateral model is hypothesised to be the most efficient for many ...
... cost LULUCF CDM projects but with high co-benefits interms of local development, poverty alleviation and ... transaction costs and sustainable development. The bilateral model is hypothesised to be the most efficient for many ...
Contents
3 | |
3 | 29 |
REFERENCES | 37 |
Matrix of research issues outputs and questions | 44 |
Matrix of research issues outputs and questions | 51 |
ANNEXICOUNTRIES | 59 |
6 | 67 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additionality analysis Annex I Table assessment AusAID baseline determination best practices biofuel capacity building carbon credits carbon offsets carbon sequestered carbon storage CDM projects CERs certified emission reductions change and forestry clean development mechanism climate change COP6 cumulative leakage developing countries distribution E-mail economic emissions trading equity evaluation forest forestry projects hosts of projects identified impacts implementation Indonesia integration International Forestry Research IPCC Issues/problems Outputs Research Jakarta Japan Kyoto Protocol landuse change LULUCF activities LULUCF projects Matrix of research ment methods monitoring multilateral Nationality Name Address negotiators opportunity costs outputs and questions Outputs Research Questions Potential investors potential value Project developers project types Questions Research Collaborators regions Research Collaborators Potential research issues Research outputs Research Questions Research SBSTA COP scenarios smallholders social and environmental stakeholders sustainable development sustainable development indicators Synthesis timber trade transaction costs value of carbon workshop World Bank
Popular passages
Page 61 - The purpose of the clean development mechanism shall be to assist Parties not included in Annex 1 in achieving sustainable development and in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention, and to assist Parties included in Annex I in achieving compliance with their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3.
Page 61 - The clean development mechanism shall be subject to the authority and guidance of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol and be supervised by an executive board of the clean development mechanism.
Page 62 - ... the developed country Parties. 4. The developed country Parties and other developed Parties included in annex II shall also assist the developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting costs of adaptation to those adverse effects.
Page 59 - Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, the European Community, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Page 61 - Protocol, on the basts of: (a) Voluntary participation approved by each Party involved; (b) Real, measurable, and long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change; and (c) Reductions in emissions that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the certified project activity. 6. The clean development mechanism shall assist in arranging funding of certified project activities as necessary.
Page 62 - Protocol shall, at its first session, elaborate modalities and procedures with the objective of ensuring transparency, efficiency and accountability through independent auditing and verification of project activities. 8 The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol shall ensure that a share of the proceeds from certified project activities is used to cover administrative expenses as well as to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable...
Page 62 - Protocol shall ensure that a share of the proceeds from certified project activities is used to cover administrative expenses as well as to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation. 9. Participation under the clean development mechanism...
Page 62 - ... the first commitment period Article 13 1. The Conference of the Parties, the supreme body of the Convention, shall serve as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol 2. Parties to the Convention that are not Parties to this Protocol...
Page 59 - Countries that are undergoing the process of transition to a market economy.
Page 61 - Parties included in Annex I may use the certified emission reductions accruing from such project activities to contribute to compliance with part of their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3, as determined by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol.