Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late ModernityThis volume brings together recent sociology of late modernity, particularly sociologies of reflexivity, aesthetics and detraditionalization, with a consideration of transformations of identity, especially transformations of gender and sexual identities. It does so in relation to questions of cultural economy; debates over the role and place of reflexivity in the social sciences; recent controversies over the significance of commodity aesthetics in regard to questions of identity; and debates on the significance of risk for the organization of contemporary sexualities. In so doing it puts forward a distinctive thesis, namely that within late modernity gender and sexuality are being reworked in terms of categories of reflexivity and risk. It shows that this reworking places increasing significance on issues of mobility and identity in late modernity. It therefore outlines the politics of mobility in regard to identity, suggesting that mobility is an important but often neglected source of power in late modernity. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 38
Page 36
For Lash's point regarding the kinds of post - traditional forms of community he describes is not to say that the reflexive ... But the kind of reflexivity at issue in these kinds of post - traditional communalization does not involve ...
For Lash's point regarding the kinds of post - traditional forms of community he describes is not to say that the reflexive ... But the kind of reflexivity at issue in these kinds of post - traditional communalization does not involve ...
Page 94
of both self - reflexivity and the kind of reflexivity between knower and known ( referential or infra - reflexivity ) which writers such as May and Latour suggest the social sciences need to embrace ? Why does the reviewer foreground ...
of both self - reflexivity and the kind of reflexivity between knower and known ( referential or infra - reflexivity ) which writers such as May and Latour suggest the social sciences need to embrace ? Why does the reviewer foreground ...
Page 117
Yet while Lupton understands the universalization of risk in relation to HIV / AIDS to signal a new kind of regulation in terms of subjection and subjectification for heterosexuals , which incites testing as one such self - regulative ...
Yet while Lupton understands the universalization of risk in relation to HIV / AIDS to signal a new kind of regulation in terms of subjection and subjectification for heterosexuals , which incites testing as one such self - regulative ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
new sociological directions and feminist sociological controversies | 13 |
reflexivity and mobility in social theory | 30 |
feminization mobility and cultural economy | 57 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aesthetic AIDS analysis appears argues argument associated assumed assumption authority Beck become body central chapter character claims concern consider constitution contemporary context cultural defined detraditionalization difference discussion economy emergence especially example Felski femininity feminist feminization fields findings flexible forms gender and sexuality grounds hence heterosexual hierarchy HIV testing HIV/AIDS idea identity important increasing increasingly individuals instance involves issue kind knower knowledge known labour Lash limits linked logic Lupton male masculinity matter McDowell McNay means mobility modes Moreover moves notes organization particular performances politics positions post social structure practices processes question recent reflexive modernization thesis regard relation to gender respondents risk seems self-conscious self-reflexivity shift significance simply social research society sociology Specifically stance style suggests surveillance techniques theory tion traditional turn understanding understood University women workers workplace