Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late ModernityThis volume brings together recent sociology of late modernity, particularly sociologies of reflexivity, aesthetics and detraditionalization, with a consideration of transformations of identity, especially transformations of gender and sexual identities. It does so in relation to questions of cultural economy; debates over the role and place of reflexivity in the social sciences; recent controversies over the significance of commodity aesthetics in regard to questions of identity; and debates on the significance of risk for the organization of contemporary sexualities. In so doing it puts forward a distinctive thesis, namely that within late modernity gender and sexuality are being reworked in terms of categories of reflexivity and risk. It shows that this reworking places increasing significance on issues of mobility and identity in late modernity. It therefore outlines the politics of mobility in regard to identity, suggesting that mobility is an important but often neglected source of power in late modernity. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 26
Page 7
In particular , this chapter looks at how reflexivity in relation to knowledge practices inscribes a hierarchy of gendered speaking positions , since as this chapter illustrates , a mobile relation to identity on the side of ...
In particular , this chapter looks at how reflexivity in relation to knowledge practices inscribes a hierarchy of gendered speaking positions , since as this chapter illustrates , a mobile relation to identity on the side of ...
Page 100
The inscription of this hierarchy is however hidden by claims that reflexivity is a ' good ' and ' progressive ' thing in regard to the gender politics of social research . Indeed what is ironic regarding this inscription is that ...
The inscription of this hierarchy is however hidden by claims that reflexivity is a ' good ' and ' progressive ' thing in regard to the gender politics of social research . Indeed what is ironic regarding this inscription is that ...
Page 127
... implicated in the politics of difference , division and hierarchy . Gender should therefore not simply be understood to be increasingly becoming an object of reflection , reflexivity or mobility post society or post structure .
... implicated in the politics of difference , division and hierarchy . Gender should therefore not simply be understood to be increasingly becoming an object of reflection , reflexivity or mobility post society or post structure .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
new sociological directions and feminist sociological controversies | 13 |
reflexivity and mobility in social theory | 30 |
feminization mobility and cultural economy | 57 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aesthetic AIDS analysis appears argues argument associated assumed assumption authority Beck become body central chapter character claims concern consider constitution contemporary context cultural defined detraditionalization difference discussion economy emergence especially example Felski femininity feminist feminization fields findings flexible forms gender and sexuality grounds hence heterosexual hierarchy HIV testing HIV/AIDS idea identity important increasing increasingly individuals instance involves issue kind knower knowledge known labour Lash limits linked logic Lupton male masculinity matter McDowell McNay means mobility modes Moreover moves notes organization particular performances politics positions post social structure practices processes question recent reflexive modernization thesis regard relation to gender respondents risk seems self-conscious self-reflexivity shift significance simply social research society sociology Specifically stance style suggests surveillance techniques theory tion traditional turn understanding understood University women workers workplace