The Liability of Classification Societies

Front Cover
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007 M06 30 - 380 pages
1 Review
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified

Classification societies are discharging various functions in the interest of flag States and shipowners. They are important actors in the system of maritime safety. Because the liability of shipowners is limited, classification societies have been considered as exempt from liability for a long time – and in several jurisdictions this view still prevails. This study analyses which actions of classification societies may give rise to claims and whether or not the societies can be held liable under English, German or United States maritime law. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of an international convention on the limitation of the liability of classification societies are developed.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Hace referencia al Prestige

Contents

Introduction
1
Community
22
B Private Operations and Public Functions in Detail
43
Obligations of the Classification Society
54
NonDelegable Duty of the Shipowner to Make the Vessel Seaworthy
55
Liability under United States Law
240
Liability under German Law
248
Damage Caused by Both a Classification and Statutory
256
A Convention on the Limitation of Liability of Classification
259
Bibliography
331
Table of Cases 351
350
Table of International Conventions
365
Index 373
372
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 237 - With us every official, from the Prime Minister down to a constable or a collector of taxes, is under the same responsibility for every act done without legal justification as any other citizen.
Page 180 - ... who has brought something on his own property which was not naturally there, harmless to others so long as it is confined to his own property, but which...
Page 138 - ... the misrepresentation been made fraudulently, that person shall be so liable notwithstanding that the misrepresentation was not made fraudulently, unless he proves that he had reasonable ground to believe and did believe up to the time the contract was made that the facts represented were true.
Page 281 - BIS 1. The defences and limits of liability provided for in these Rules shall apply in any action against the carrier in respect of loss or damage to goods covered by a contract of carriage whether the action be founded in contract or in tort.
Page 109 - The liability for negligence, whether you style it such or treat it as in other systems as a species of 'culpa', is no doubt based upon a general public sentiment of moral wrongdoing for which the offender must pay.
Page 148 - ... the moral blame attached to the defendant's conduct, and the policy of preventing future harm.
Page 56 - The duty is absolute, but it is a duty only to furnish a vessel and appurtenances reasonably fit for their intended use.
Page 106 - Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.

Bibliographic information