 | 1973 - 142 pages
...defined as such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. This is something less than the weight of the evidence, and the possibility of drawing two inconsistent... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Education and Labor - 1939 - 852 pages
...Co. of New York v. National Labor Relations Board, supra (59 S. Ct. (206) 217 (83 L. Ed. — )), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the Jury." The pronouncement of the test to be applied by a reviewing court to ascertain whether a finding by... | |
 | United States. Customs Court - 1975 - 376 pages
...is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 US 292. "Under this test... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Labor - 1939 - 1332 pages
..."inclusion." Cotmolulfiteit Edinon Co. of JVeio York v. National Labor Relations "oord, supra, and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict when (he conclusion sought to be drawn from it is «» of fact for the Jury. (See K. <£ 0. Railroad Co.... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Education and Labor - 1940 - 1662 pages
...Co. of Hew York v. National Labor Relations Board, supra (59 S. Ct. (206) 217 (83 L. Ed. — ) ), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the Jury." The pronouncement of the test to be applied by a reviewing court to ascertain •whether a finding... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Labor - 1940 - 1566 pages
...a fowlusion," Connolidnted- Edison Co. of Ncw> York v. National IMOOI- Relations Board, supra, and It must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...when the conclusion sought to be drawn from it is «e of fact for the jury. (See B. d 0. Railroad Co. v. Qroegaer (2(56 US 521, 84): Gunning v. Coolcy... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means - 1943 - 1002 pages
...support a conclusion' (Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, p. 229), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury." While the Court says "substantial evidence is something more than a scintilla and must do more than... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1944 - 1554 pages
...Consolidated Eilixon (Jo. v. NLRB, supra, [305 US 197, page 229], 59 S. Ct. [206], 217 [83 L. Ed. 126 1 . and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...drawn from it is one of fact for the jury." NLRB v. Columbia Co., 306 US 292, 300, .59 S. Ct. 501, 505, 83 L. Ed. 660. The remaining employee included... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1968 - 1564 pages
...Evidence to support a finding of fact by an administrative agency is substantial if the evidence is "enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a...of fact for the jury." NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 US 292, 300, 59 S.Ct. 501, 505, 83 L.Ed. 660 (1939). A verdict may be directed... | |
| |
must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of the fact to be established. * * * it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict when the conclusion sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. 
