| Federal Radiation Council (U.S.) - 1960 - 28 pages
...of conditions. The following is taken from the Council's recommendations approved by the President: "There can be no single permissible or acceptable...regard to the reasons for permitting the exposure ... It is basic that exposure to radiation should result from a real determination of its necessity.... | |
| United States. Congress. Atomic Energy Joint Committee - 1960 - 828 pages
...and "permissible" both have unfortunate connotations not intended by either the NCRP or the ICRP. (5) There can be no single permissible or acceptable level of exposure without regard to the reason for permitting the exposure. It should be general practice to reduce exposure to radiation,... | |
| 1960
...and "permissible" both have unfortunate connotations not intended by either the NCRP or the ICRP. (5) There can be no single permissible or acceptable level of exposure without regard to the reason for permitting the exposure. It should be general practice to reduce exposure to radiation,... | |
| United States. Public Health Service - 1962 - 92 pages
...the Federal Eadiation Council is considered especially pertinent in applying these Standards : (2) "There can be no single permissible or acceptable level of exposure without regard to the reason for permitting the exposure. It should be general practice to reduce exposure to radiation,... | |
| Conrad P. Straub - 1964 - 482 pages
...(a) Individual .. _ \13weeks . . .. J. Year . OS (whole body). (b) Average 30 year 5 (gonads). (5) There can be no single permissible or acceptable level of exposure without regard to the reason for permitting the exposure. It should be general practice to reduce exposure to radiation,... | |
| Arthur Reetz - 1965 - 576 pages
...the reasons for doing so . ..." In addition, the FRC Report No. 1 states: in paragraph 7.7, ". . . there can be no single permissible or acceptable level...regard to the reasons for permitting the exposure"; and further states, in paragraph 7.10, "There can, of course, be quite different numerical values for... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Public Works - 1966 - 1830 pages
...as a guideline for maximum exj>osures if such exj>osure levels become necessary. The Council state, "there can be no single 'permissible' or 'acceptable'...regard to the reasons for permitting the exposure," and that 'all exposures should be kept as far below any arbitrarily selected levels as practicable."... | |
| United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy - 1966 - 612 pages
...benefit vs. risk philosophy of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, as follows : "There can be no single permissible or acceptable level of exposure without regard to the reason for permitting the exposure. It should be general practice to reduce exposure to radiation,... | |
| |