COURT CASES FEDERAL-Continued

United States ex rel. Sollano v. Doak, 5 F. Supp. 561, aff'd. 68 F. (2d) 1019
United States ex rel. Sommerkamp v. Zimmerman, 178 F. (2d) 645 (C. A.
3, 1949).

Page

496

65

United States ex rel. Stapf v. Corsi, 287 U. S. 129 (1932), 53 Sup. Ct. 40,
77 L. Ed. 215_----

128

United States ex rel. Steffner v. Carmichael, 183 F. (2d) 19 (C. A. 5,
1950)-----

129, 174

319

United States ex rel. Strauber r. Shaughnessy, 107 F. Supp. 399–
United States ex rel. Tisi r. Tod, 264 U. S. 133, 68 L. Ed. 591 –
United States ex rel. Vantauer v. Com. of Immigration, 273 U. S. 103, 71
L. Ed. 563 (1927)‒‒‒‒‒‒

582

582

237, 246

United States ex rel. Valenti r. Karnuth, 1 F. Supp. 370, 376_‒‒‒‒‒‒
United States ex rel. Volpe v. Smith, 289 U. S. 422 (1933) 77 L. Ed.
1298_____
20, 236, 465, 573, 602, 604
United States ex rel. Zaffarano v. Corsi, 63 F. (2d) 757 (C. C. A. 2,
1933) ----
21, 27, 243, 491, 510, 514, 647

Valenti v. Clark, 83 F. Supp. 167, 168–

175

Varletta v. Barber, 98 F. Supp. 177 (N. D. Calif. 1951)__
Viereck v. U. S. 318 U. S. 236, 87 L. Ed. 734, 63 Sup. Ct. 561.
Von Kleczkowski v. Watkins, 71 F. Supp. 429, 437 (D. C. S. D., N. Y. ) ‒‒‒‒‒
Wadia v. U. S. 101 F. (2d) 7, (C. C. A. 2, 1939) _.
Weedin v. Ung Sue Chu, 64 F. (2d) 953 (C. C. A. 9, 1933)
Weedin v. Yamada, 4 F. (2d) 455 (C. C. A. 9, 1925).
Weems v. United States, 217 U. S. 349, 363–

573

271

762

283

467

28, 514

382

Western Fire Insurance Company v. University City, 124 F. (2d) 698
(C. C. A. 8, 1942)____.

174

Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U. S. 226----

614

Williams v. United States ex rel. Bougadis, 186 U. S. 479 (C. C. A. 2, 1911)
Wilson v. United States, 162 U. S. 613-

161

763

Wilson & Company v. United States, 15 F. Supp. 332-

385

Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 70 Sup. Ct. 445, 339 U. S. 33, 94 L. Ed. 383
(1950)---

122, 580, 590

Zurbrick v. Woodhead, 90 F.

(2d) 991 (C. C. A. 6, 1937)

Wood v. United States, 128 F. (2d) 265, 268 (C. A., D. C., 1942) .
Yusem v. United States, 8 F. (2d) 6 (C. C. A. 3, 1925).

Zydok v. Butterfield, 187 F. (2d) 802 (C. A. 6, March 1951)

763

447

236

563

COURT CASES-STATE

Alsberry v. Hawkins, (1839) 3 Dana (Kentucky) 177, 178 39 Ky. (1839)
Anderson v. Bryson 94 Fla. 1165, 115 So. 505 (1927) –

757

299

Barefield v. State 14 Ala. 603 (1848).

102

Beaumont Pasture Co. v. Preston & Smith, 65 Texas 448 (1886) ---
Berryhill v. Sepp, 119, N. W. 404 (1909) 106 Minn. 458, 21 L. R. A., N. S.
344

385

430

Blackburn v. State, 230 Ohio St. 146____

151

Blythe v. Ayres, 96 Cal. 532, 1892 (reheard 102 Cal. 254 (1894))------ 357, 404
Bolton v. Hey, 31 A. 1097 (Pa. 1895).

174

Brainard v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 68, Cal. App. (2d) 591,
157 P. (2d) 7 (1945)-----

647

Brennan v. Seattle, 151 Wash. 665, 668_.

403

Caldwell v. Commonwealth, 221 Ky. 232, 298 S. W. 681 (1927)--

299

Commonwealth v. Bandy 291 Ky. 721, 165 S. W. (2d) 337–
Commonwealth v. Blood, 70 Mass. 31, 4 Gray 31.

298

495

Commonwealth v. Bruce, 4. P. L. J. 14 (1845) Pa..
Commonwealth v. Dennis, 105 Mass. 162___

637

151

Commonwealth ex rel v. Grove, 40 Pa. Dist. and County Rep. 139 (Apr.
30, 1940), 88 P. L. J. 583..

Commonwealth v Farrell 322 Mass. 606 (78 N. E. (2d) 697 (1948) ) ‒‒‒‒
Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. 215 S. W. 42 (Ky. 1919)
Commonwealth v. Gieringer, 16 Berks County L. J. 112 (1923) Pa.‒‒‒‒‒‒
Commonwealth ex rel. v. Grove, 40 Pa. Dist. and County Rep. 139 (Apr.
30, 1940), 88 P. L. J. 583_.

Commonwealth v. Hammock 198 Ky. 785, 250 S. W. 85 (1923)_.
Commonwealth v. Hicks, 118 Ky. 637__

298

151

Commonwealth v. Hunt, 216 Mass. 126, 103 N. E. 399 (1913).

101

Commonwealth v. Jenkins, 46 D. & C. 677 (1942) Pa.

Commonwealth v. Mink, 123 Mass. 422_

Commonwealth v. Mixer, 207 Mass. 141, 93 N. E. 249__.

637

151

513

Commonwealth v. Warren 20. N. W. C. (Pa.) 378 (1887).

Commonwealth v. Wigenroth, 38 Lancaster Law Review 413 (1923) (Pa.)
Commonwealth v. Wolansky, 316 Mass. 61 (55 N. E. (2d) 902)__

101

637

515

Commonwealth v. Wright, 26 C. C. (Pa.) 666_

151

Continental Supply Co. v. Abell 24 P. (2d) 133, (Mont. 1933)
Creale v. State, 71 Tex. Crim, Rep. 9 (1913).

174

447

Criterion Holding Co. v. Cerussi, 140 Misc. 855 (1931) 250 N. Y. S. 735_Daly v. Sperry Gyroscope Co. Inc. 195 Misc. 169 (1949) 89 N. Y. S. (2d) 566____

315

315

Dedieu v. People 22 N. Y. 178_

244

Di Donato v. Rosenberg 245 N. Y. S. 675, 230 App. Div. 538_
Dishon v. Smith 10 Iowa 212 (1859) –.

384

102

Dorsey v. Brigham 52 N. E. 303, 177 Ill. 250, 42 L. R. A. 809, 69 Am.......

430

Dorus v. Lyon 101 A. 490, 92 Conn. 55----

432

Douglass v. Queeny, 167 A. 453, 109 Pa. Super, Ct. 336_

431

Dunlap v. State, 143 Tex. Crim. Rep. 601 (1942).

447

Du Vall v. Board of Medical Examiners 49 Ariz. 329, 66 P. (2d) 1026___
Eckles v. State, 20 Ohio St. 508-

Fuller v. Home Indemnity Co. 318 Mass. 37, 60 N. E. (2d) 1 (1945).

Harris v. Harris 215 N. W. 661, Sup. Ct. Iowa (1927).

91

Huffman v. State 205 Ind. 75, 185 N. E. 131 (1933)

299

Hughes v. Commonwealth 232 Ky. 232, 22 S. W. (2d) 618 (1929)--
Humphries v. Shapiro 175 N. Y. S. 426__.

299

384

Hundert v. Com. Trav. Mut. Acc. Ass'n., 279 N. Y. S. 555..
Hutchinson v. State 36 Tex. 293 (1871).

151

101

Inhabitants of Jefferson v. Inhabitants of Washington, 19 Me. (1 App.) 293

431

In re Dardis 135 Wisc. 457.

384

COURT CASES-STATE-Continued

Page

In re Kirby's Estate, 121 P. 370 (Cal.).

743

In re McNese, 346 Mo., 425, 142 S. W. (2) 33 (1940)

King v. Commonwealth 203 Ky. 163, 261 S. W. 1096 (1924) –

Marshall v. State, 108 Tex. Crim. Rep. 561 (1928), 2 S. W. (2d) 233–
May v. Pennell, 101 Me. 516____.

447

151

McCracken's Case 251 Mass. 347, 146 N. E. 904 (1925).

174

McDonald v. Sobel 272 App. Div. N. Y. 455, (aff'd. 297 N. Y. 679).
McGregor v. Provident Trust Co. 119 Fla. 718, 162 So. 323 (1935) –
McLean v. Hargrove, 162 S. W. (2d) 954 (1942) (Texas) –

244

174

766

Meyer v. Board of Medical Examiners et al 206 P. (2d) 1085 (Cal) _.
Moffit v. Jordan 127 Cal. 628, 60 P. 175_--

266

384

Moses v. State, 147, Tex. Crim. Rep. 206 (1944).

Parker's Appeal, 44 Pa. 309__.

Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Cobbs, 23 Ala. App. 205_

People v. Ah Fook 62 Cal. 493 (1881).

Rudolph v. State, 128 Wisc. 222, 107 N. W. 466 (1906) –

People v. Baker 365 Ill. 328_

447

635

151

102

101

253

People v. Bennett, 182 App. Div. 871, 170 N. Y. Supp. 718 (1918)_.

101

People v. Bones, 170 P. 166, 167, 168 (1917) (Cal.)‒‒‒‒‒

People v. James, 40 Cal. App. (2d) 740, 746, 105 P. (2d) 947-_.
People v. Kelly, 140 P. 302, 305 (1914) (Cal.)

267

743

People v. Ledwell 14 N. Y. (2d) 371, (1939), 14 N. Y. S. (2d).
People v. Mackey, 58 Cal. App. 123, 130, 208 P. 135, 138–

People v. McNulty, 26 P. 597 (1891) (Cal.) ‒‒‒‒‒‒

People v. Mojado 22 Cal. App. (2d) 323, 70 P. (2d) 1015_
People v. Olans 264 N. Y. 420 (1934).

299

268

743

267

298

People v. Peters 265 Ill. 122, 106 N. E. 513 (1914).

101

People v. Pilgrim, 166 P. (2d) 636, 640 (1946) (Cal.).

People v. Wein 196 App. Div. N. Y. 368, 370 (187 N. Y. S. 753).

246

People v. Weiss 263 N. Y. 537, 263–

298

People v. Will 289 N. Y. 413, 46 N. E. (2d) 498 (1943) –

299

People ex rel. Prisament v. Brophy, 287 N. Y. 132 (1941) ___.

75

People ex rel. Romano v. Brophy 280 N. Y. 181, 20 N. E. (2d) 385..
Pippin v. State, 197 Ala. 613, 73 So. 340---

244

646

Redwater Land & Canal Co. v. Reed, 26 S. D. 466, 128 N. W. 702, 708 (1910)
Rept. of Attorney General, N. Y. State (1933) p. 83-

766

636

COURT CASES-STATE-Continued

Rodd v. Verage, 177 Wisc. 295 (1922) 187 N. W. 830, 842.
Royal Circle v. Achterrath, 204 Ill. 549-.
Rudolph v. State, 128 Wisc. 222, 107 N. W. 466 (1906).
Sanders v. Dixon 89 S. W. 577, 114 Mo. App. 229 (1905).
Sanders v. State, 54 Texas Cr. 101_.

Sherry v. Ingels, 34 Cal. App. (2d) 632 94 P. (2d) 77--
Speer v. State, 109 S. W. (2) 1150 (1937) Texas_.
State v. Biango, 75 N. J. L. 284, 68 A. 125.
State v. Blaine, 104 N. J. L. 325, 137 A. 829_.
State v. Brown, 47 Ohio St. 102, 23 N. E. 747–

State v. Campbell, 251 N. W. 717 Iowa___

State v. Carney, 69 N. J. L. 478--

State v. Ellis 38 N. J. L. 102 (1868).

State v. Gazell, 30 Mo. 92____.

State v. Harrison, 107 N. J. L. 213.

State v. Johnson (N. J.), 30 N. J. L. 185--

Page

77

151

101

431

151

268

646

495

495

635

151

151

101

253

494

495

State v. Lee, 127 Wash. 377, 220 P. 753 (1923) –

State v. Levelle, 34 S. C. 120, (1890).

648

151

State v. Linder, 287 P. 16, 156 Wash. 452 (1930) –
State v. McDonald 106 Ind. 233, 6 N. E. 607 (1886).

State v. McGinnis 166 W. Va. 473, 181 S. E. 820 (1935) –

State v. Miller 182 Mo. 370, 81 S. W. 867 (1904).

State v. Mitchener 98 N. C. 689_

State v. Sullivan 110 Mo. App. 75, 84 S. W. 105 (1904) __

102

State v. Taylor, 136 Mo. 66‒‒‒‒.

253

State v. Thomas, 65 N. J. L. 598, 48 A. 1007, reversing 64 N. J. L. 532,

45 A. 913__.

495

State v. Tummons 225 Mo. App. 429, 37 S. W. 2d 499 (1931).

Thompson v. Louisville Banking Co. 55 S. W. 1080 (Ky. 1900).

174

Union Gas & Electric Co. v. Coffman, 36 Ohio Law Rep. 201 (1931) __

299

Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co. 58 Calif. App. (2d) 30, 135 P. (2d) 621 (1943).

R. v. Gardner, L. & C. 243 (Australia).
R. v. Holloway, 1 Den. 370, (1849, Eng.)
R. v. Johnson, 6 S. C. R. 201 (1867, Australia)
R. v. Jones, 19 C. Australia, Rep. 39–
R. v. King, S. S. R. 562 (Australia)

R. v. Mortimer, 1 C. of Australia Rep. 20–
R. v. Thurborn, 1 Den. 587 (1848, Eng.)
Trainer v. R., 4 C. L. R. 126 (1906, Australia).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

30 Op. Atty. Gen. 412 (1950), pp. 97, 157 | 39 Op. Atty. Gen. 215, 220, 221 (1938), 37 Op. Atty. Gen. 102, (1933), p. 633 37 Op. Atty. Gen. 102, 110-111, p. 614 37 Op. Atty. Gen. 259, (1933), p. 254 37 Op. Atty. Gen. 293, 294 (1933), p. 102 38 Op. Atty. Gen. 10 (1934), p. 618 39 Op. Atty. Gen. 95 (1937), p. 177 39 Op. Atty. Gen. 95, 96, p. 150 39 Op. Atty. Gen. 215, pp. 114, 376

OPINIONS OF SOLICITOR OF LABOR

Op. of July 17, 1934, S. D., 55632/163, p. 86

MISCELLANEOUS AUTHORITIES