The Bedrock of Opinion: Science, Technology and Society in the Siting of High-Level Nuclear Waste

Front Cover
Springer Science & Business Media, 2002 M02 28 - 246 pages
When did man discover nuclear waste? To answer this question, we first have to ask if nuclear waste really is something that could be called a scientific discovery, such as might deserve a Nobel Prize in physics. In early writings within nuclear energy research radioactive waste appears to be a neglected issue, a story never told. Nuclear waste first seems to appear when a public debate arose about public health risks of nuclear power in the late 1960s and early 70s. In nuclear physics, consensus was established at an early stage about the understanding of the splitting of uranium nuclei. The fission products were identified and their chains of disintegration and radioactivity soon were well established facts among the involved scientists, as was an awareness of the risks, for example the strong radioactivity of strontium and iodine, and the poisonous effects of plutonium. However, the by-products were never, either in part or in total, called or perceived as waste, just as fission by-products. How and where to dispose of the by-products were questions that were never asked by the pioneers of nuclear physics.

From inside the book

Contents

Prologue
1
A Critical Matter
7
Analysing the Place of Matter
8
Experts in Modern Societies
11
Sweden Nuclear Power and Nuclear Waste
13
MultiBarrier Agreements
14
The Contested US Programme
18
The Famous Swedish Programme
20
Cultural Theory
134
Conclusions
137
Geologists Mapping Bedrock
143
The First Investigations
146
KBS Geological Investigations
149
KBS Supplementary Investigation
152
KBS 3 Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory and the SKB RD Programmes
158
Geological Interpretations
162

Comparing Siting Strategies
22
Outline and Objectives
24
Authors Position
25
Constructing a Theoretical Framework
29
Science and Political DecisionMaking
31
The Construction of Controversies and Consensus
38
The Dilemma of STS?
43
The Discovery of Nuclear Waste
49
The Early History of Radioactive Waste
52
The Early Swedish Context
56
The Role of Experts in the Early Swedish Nuclear Era
60
The First Principles of Nuclear Waste Disposal
65
The Achilles Heel of Nuclear Power
68
Interpreting Absolute Safety
75
A New Government and a New Act
76
The Regulation of the Ringhals 3 Reactor
78
The Review Process
80
The Governments Interpretation of the Act
84
The New Application
88
The National Referendum as a Final Solution
92
Science vs Policy in the Regulation of the Ringhals 3 Reactor
94
Politicians Using Experts
98
Conclusions
103
No Particular Place to Go
109
The KBS 3 Concept and Another New Act
110
Two Strategies of Siting
113
One Strategy of Siting?
125
Explaining the Strategies
126
Rationalism
127
Networking Geologists
165
Conclusions
170
The Myth of Democracy
175
Public Acceptance
176
Corporatism
178
Democracy in Theory
179
Legislation Decision Making and Democracy
183
Feasibility Democracy
186
The Municipality of Malá
189
Municipalities Hosting Nuclear Facilities
191
The Municipality of Nyköping
192
The Municipality of Östhammar
194
The Municipality of Oskarshamn
195
The Oskarshamn Youth Opinion
198
The Municipalities of Tierp Hultsfred and Älvkarleby
201
Feasible Democracy and Strategic Actions
204
National Coordination
206
SKBs Choice of Site Investigations
208
The Myth of Democracy
211
Conclusions
214
Regulating Technological Systems
221
Rocks and Marmalade
222
The Myth of Science and the Myth of Democracy
225
Science Technology and the Construction of Society
226
Opening the Black Box of Swedish Nuclear Waste Management
227
References
229
Index
243
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information