| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources - 1994 - 164 pages
...the Senate ratified the Framework Convention on Climate Change, it was the Senate's position that any decision by the Executive Branch to reinterpret the...Convention to apply legally binding targets and timetables to the United States would alter the shared understanding of the Convention between the Senate and... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources - 1994 - 76 pages
...When the Senate ratified the Framework Convention on Climate Change, it took the position that "Any decision by the Executive Branch to re-interpret the...Convention to apply legally binding targets and timetables to the United States would require further ratification by the Senate." Yet we seem launched on it... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science - 1999 - 982 pages
...States could deposit its instruments of ratification for such an agreement. The Committee notes further that a decision by the executive branch to reinterpret the Convention to apply legally binding targets arid timetables for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases to the United States would alter the "shared... | |
| |