Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court: The Defining CasesTerry Eastland Rowman & Littlefield, 2000 - 397 pages In Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court, Terry Eastland brings together the Court's leading First Amendment cases, some 60 in all, starting with Schenck v. United States (1919) and ending with Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1998). Complete with a comprehensive introduction, pertinent indices and a useful bibliography, Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court offers the general and specialized reader alike a thorough treatment of the Court's understanding on the First Amendment's speech, press, assembly, and petition clauses. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 76
Page xvii
... exercise this right , but to no avail , and the Declaration of Independence put forth the flouting of " our repeated petitions " for redress as one of the main grievances against King George III . The obvious contribution the states ...
... exercise this right , but to no avail , and the Declaration of Independence put forth the flouting of " our repeated petitions " for redress as one of the main grievances against King George III . The obvious contribution the states ...
Page xix
... " This is done in written constitutions that are para- mount to ordinary laws , he continued , and freedom of speech and press enjoy constitutional protection because they are crucial to the exercise of the INTRODUCTION xix.
... " This is done in written constitutions that are para- mount to ordinary laws , he continued , and freedom of speech and press enjoy constitutional protection because they are crucial to the exercise of the INTRODUCTION xix.
Page xx
The Defining Cases Terry Eastland. protection because they are crucial to the exercise of the right of self - government . Madison saw freedom of speech and press as nothing less than a necessary condition of republican government ; it ...
The Defining Cases Terry Eastland. protection because they are crucial to the exercise of the right of self - government . Madison saw freedom of speech and press as nothing less than a necessary condition of republican government ; it ...
Page 13
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 14
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
V | xxix |
VI | 5 |
VII | 10 |
VIII | 18 |
IX | 22 |
X | 24 |
XIII | 30 |
XIV | 34 |
XLIV | 183 |
XLV | 190 |
XLVII | 193 |
XLVIII | 196 |
L | 207 |
LI | 216 |
LII | 233 |
LIII | 238 |
XV | 37 |
XVII | 43 |
XVIII | 45 |
XX | 49 |
XXI | 52 |
XXII | 54 |
XXIII | 63 |
XXIV | 71 |
XXV | 77 |
XXVI | 86 |
XXVII | 94 |
XXVIII | 100 |
XXIX | 105 |
XXXI | 110 |
XXXII | 121 |
XXXIII | 131 |
XXXIV | 135 |
XXXV | 142 |
XXXVI | 146 |
XXXVII | 153 |
XXXVIII | 156 |
XL | 164 |
XLI | 166 |
XLII | 171 |
XLIII | 176 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
44 Liquormart abridgment action activities adult adult theaters advertising Amendment protection Amendment rights American applied believe Bill of Rights Blackmun Branzburg Brennan broadcast censorship Chaplinsky clause clear and present commercial speech Communist Concurring conduct Congress constitutionally conviction Court of Appeals criminal decided decision DELIVERED THE OPINION dissent doctrine effect exercise expression fact federal fighting words flag Fourteenth Amendment free speech freedom of speech governmental interest Holmes ideas incite issue judgment jury justify legislative libel liberty limited material means ment newspaper obscenity officials ordinance Paris Adult Theatre Party peace person petitioners police political present danger prior restraint prohibition proscribed provisions punish question reason regulation Rehnquist Renton requires responsibility restraint restriction sexual speaker standards State's statute substantial substantive evil suppression Supreme Court Terminiello tion trial U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United utterance violation York York Times Co