Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court: The Defining CasesTerry Eastland Rowman & Littlefield, 2000 - 397 pages In Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court, Terry Eastland brings together the Court's leading First Amendment cases, some 60 in all, starting with Schenck v. United States (1919) and ending with Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1998). Complete with a comprehensive introduction, pertinent indices and a useful bibliography, Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court offers the general and specialized reader alike a thorough treatment of the Court's understanding on the First Amendment's speech, press, assembly, and petition clauses. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 82
Page ix
... concern a wide range of free expression claims — the Supreme Court has substantially broadened First Amendment ... concerned the con- gressional effort to encourage " decency and respect " among NEA - funded artistic expressions . The ...
... concern a wide range of free expression claims — the Supreme Court has substantially broadened First Amendment ... concerned the con- gressional effort to encourage " decency and respect " among NEA - funded artistic expressions . The ...
Page xiv
... concerned the extent to which they explicitly protected rights — both the natural rights of the Declaration and the rights that were considered means of vindicating those nat- ural rights . All of the constitutions , state and federal ...
... concerned the extent to which they explicitly protected rights — both the natural rights of the Declaration and the rights that were considered means of vindicating those nat- ural rights . All of the constitutions , state and federal ...
Page xx
... concern of not the criminal but the civil law , and individuals , including public officials , who thought they had been defamed went to court to invoke the law's protection . The states typically in- corporated Zengerian principles ...
... concern of not the criminal but the civil law , and individuals , including public officials , who thought they had been defamed went to court to invoke the law's protection . The states typically in- corporated Zengerian principles ...
Page xxi
... Concerned about the dispropor- tionate influence upon the nation exerted by the New York newspapers , the administration moved against the five papers by excluding them from the mails . Newspapers of that era were distributed almost ...
... Concerned about the dispropor- tionate influence upon the nation exerted by the New York newspapers , the administration moved against the five papers by excluding them from the mails . Newspapers of that era were distributed almost ...
Page 4
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
V | xxix |
VI | 5 |
VII | 10 |
VIII | 18 |
IX | 22 |
X | 24 |
XIII | 30 |
XIV | 34 |
XLIV | 183 |
XLV | 190 |
XLVII | 193 |
XLVIII | 196 |
L | 207 |
LI | 216 |
LII | 233 |
LIII | 238 |
XV | 37 |
XVII | 43 |
XVIII | 45 |
XX | 49 |
XXI | 52 |
XXII | 54 |
XXIII | 63 |
XXIV | 71 |
XXV | 77 |
XXVI | 86 |
XXVII | 94 |
XXVIII | 100 |
XXIX | 105 |
XXXI | 110 |
XXXII | 121 |
XXXIII | 131 |
XXXIV | 135 |
XXXV | 142 |
XXXVI | 146 |
XXXVII | 153 |
XXXVIII | 156 |
XL | 164 |
XLI | 166 |
XLII | 171 |
XLIII | 176 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
44 Liquormart abridgment action activities adult adult theaters advertising Amendment protection Amendment rights American applied believe Bill of Rights Blackmun Branzburg Brennan broadcast censorship Chaplinsky clause clear and present commercial speech Communist Concurring conduct Congress constitutionally conviction Court of Appeals criminal decided decision DELIVERED THE OPINION dissent doctrine effect exercise expression fact federal fighting words flag Fourteenth Amendment free speech freedom of speech governmental interest Holmes ideas incite issue judgment jury justify legislative libel liberty limited material means ment newspaper obscenity officials ordinance Paris Adult Theatre Party peace person petitioners police political present danger prior restraint prohibition proscribed provisions punish question reason regulation Rehnquist Renton requires responsibility restraint restriction sexual speaker standards State's statute substantial substantive evil suppression Supreme Court Terminiello tion trial U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United utterance violation York York Times Co