Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court: The Defining CasesTerry Eastland Rowman & Littlefield, 2000 - 397 pages In Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court, Terry Eastland brings together the Court's leading First Amendment cases, some 60 in all, starting with Schenck v. United States (1919) and ending with Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1998). Complete with a comprehensive introduction, pertinent indices and a useful bibliography, Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court offers the general and specialized reader alike a thorough treatment of the Court's understanding on the First Amendment's speech, press, assembly, and petition clauses. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 93
Page xvi
... applying to the legislature by petitions , or remonstrances for redress of their grievances . Madison also recommended for insertion in Article I , Section 10 , between clauses 1 and 2 , this clause : No state shall violate the equal ...
... applying to the legislature by petitions , or remonstrances for redress of their grievances . Madison also recommended for insertion in Article I , Section 10 , between clauses 1 and 2 , this clause : No state shall violate the equal ...
Page xvii
... applied only to the federal government . In the twentieth century , the Court decided that cer- tain provisions in the Bill of Rights , including those concerning freedom of expression , do apply to the states . It is likely that ...
... applied only to the federal government . In the twentieth century , the Court decided that cer- tain provisions in the Bill of Rights , including those concerning freedom of expression , do apply to the states . It is likely that ...
Page xxiii
... applied the bad - tendency test in sustaining convictions under the Espionage Act of 1917 for speech that obstructed military recruitment . " If the act ( speaking , or circulating a paper ) , its tendency , and the intent with which it ...
... applied the bad - tendency test in sustaining convictions under the Espionage Act of 1917 for speech that obstructed military recruitment . " If the act ( speaking , or circulating a paper ) , its tendency , and the intent with which it ...
Page 6
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 13
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
V | xxix |
VI | 5 |
VII | 10 |
VIII | 18 |
IX | 22 |
X | 24 |
XIII | 30 |
XIV | 34 |
XLIV | 183 |
XLV | 190 |
XLVII | 193 |
XLVIII | 196 |
L | 207 |
LI | 216 |
LII | 233 |
LIII | 238 |
XV | 37 |
XVII | 43 |
XVIII | 45 |
XX | 49 |
XXI | 52 |
XXII | 54 |
XXIII | 63 |
XXIV | 71 |
XXV | 77 |
XXVI | 86 |
XXVII | 94 |
XXVIII | 100 |
XXIX | 105 |
XXXI | 110 |
XXXII | 121 |
XXXIII | 131 |
XXXIV | 135 |
XXXV | 142 |
XXXVI | 146 |
XXXVII | 153 |
XXXVIII | 156 |
XL | 164 |
XLI | 166 |
XLII | 171 |
XLIII | 176 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
44 Liquormart abridgment action activities adult adult theaters advertising Amendment protection Amendment rights American applied believe Bill of Rights Blackmun Branzburg Brennan broadcast censorship Chaplinsky clause clear and present commercial speech Communist Concurring conduct Congress constitutionally conviction Court of Appeals criminal decided decision DELIVERED THE OPINION dissent doctrine effect exercise expression fact federal fighting words flag Fourteenth Amendment free speech freedom of speech governmental interest Holmes ideas incite issue judgment jury justify legislative libel liberty limited material means ment newspaper obscenity officials ordinance Paris Adult Theatre Party peace person petitioners police political present danger prior restraint prohibition proscribed provisions punish question reason regulation Rehnquist Renton requires responsibility restraint restriction sexual speaker standards State's statute substantial substantive evil suppression Supreme Court Terminiello tion trial U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United utterance violation York York Times Co