Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court: The Defining CasesTerry Eastland Rowman & Littlefield, 2000 - 397 pages In Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court, Terry Eastland brings together the Court's leading First Amendment cases, some 60 in all, starting with Schenck v. United States (1919) and ending with Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1998). Complete with a comprehensive introduction, pertinent indices and a useful bibliography, Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court offers the general and specialized reader alike a thorough treatment of the Court's understanding on the First Amendment's speech, press, assembly, and petition clauses. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 77
Page ix
... Freedom of Expression " to represent the gamut of what the Court has seen fit to bring within the protection of the First Amendment . The First Amendment actually says this : " Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of ...
... Freedom of Expression " to represent the gamut of what the Court has seen fit to bring within the protection of the First Amendment . The First Amendment actually says this : " Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of ...
Page x
The Defining Cases Terry Eastland. of legal doctrine . It may extend First Amendment protection to some new activity ( such as commercial speech ) . It may show the Court reversing a decision made by Congress or the states , or even ...
The Defining Cases Terry Eastland. of legal doctrine . It may extend First Amendment protection to some new activity ( such as commercial speech ) . It may show the Court reversing a decision made by Congress or the states , or even ...
Page xiii
... Constitution think it necessary to amend the newly minted document so substantially by adding a bill of rights ? And why did this bill of rights include an amendment instructing Congress that it could not abridge certain freedoms ? For ...
... Constitution think it necessary to amend the newly minted document so substantially by adding a bill of rights ? And why did this bill of rights include an amendment instructing Congress that it could not abridge certain freedoms ? For ...
Page xvii
... protection made its way into the Constitution . The Senate did not strike the other amendment that eventually became our First Amend- ment but rewrote it to read : " That Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech , or ...
... protection made its way into the Constitution . The Senate did not strike the other amendment that eventually became our First Amend- ment but rewrote it to read : " That Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech , or ...
Page xix
... freedom of the press would emerge . But when the First Amendment was added to the ... Amendment . The thought and experience of a lifetime , indeed the taught ... protection because they are crucial to the exercise of the INTRODUCTION xix.
... freedom of the press would emerge . But when the First Amendment was added to the ... Amendment . The thought and experience of a lifetime , indeed the taught ... protection because they are crucial to the exercise of the INTRODUCTION xix.
Contents
V | xxix |
VI | 5 |
VII | 10 |
VIII | 18 |
IX | 22 |
X | 24 |
XIII | 30 |
XIV | 34 |
XLIV | 183 |
XLV | 190 |
XLVII | 193 |
XLVIII | 196 |
L | 207 |
LI | 216 |
LII | 233 |
LIII | 238 |
XV | 37 |
XVII | 43 |
XVIII | 45 |
XX | 49 |
XXI | 52 |
XXII | 54 |
XXIII | 63 |
XXIV | 71 |
XXV | 77 |
XXVI | 86 |
XXVII | 94 |
XXVIII | 100 |
XXIX | 105 |
XXXI | 110 |
XXXII | 121 |
XXXIII | 131 |
XXXIV | 135 |
XXXV | 142 |
XXXVI | 146 |
XXXVII | 153 |
XXXVIII | 156 |
XL | 164 |
XLI | 166 |
XLII | 171 |
XLIII | 176 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
44 Liquormart abridgment action activities adult adult theaters advertising Amendment protection Amendment rights American applied believe Bill of Rights Blackmun Branzburg Brennan broadcast censorship Chaplinsky clause clear and present commercial speech Communist Concurring conduct Congress constitutionally conviction Court of Appeals criminal decided decision DELIVERED THE OPINION dissent doctrine effect exercise expression fact federal fighting words flag Fourteenth Amendment free speech freedom of speech governmental interest Holmes ideas incite issue judgment jury justify legislative libel liberty limited material means ment newspaper obscenity officials ordinance Paris Adult Theatre Party peace person petitioners police political present danger prior restraint prohibition proscribed provisions punish question reason regulation Rehnquist Renton requires responsibility restraint restriction sexual speaker standards State's statute substantial substantive evil suppression Supreme Court Terminiello tion trial U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United utterance violation York York Times Co