Twenty-First Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready?James M. Ludes, Henry Sokolski Routledge, 2014 M01 14 - 208 pages Leading US security practitioners fromt he Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush and Clinton administrations, plus other experts on proliferation, clarify the weapons proliferation threats that the US and its allies will face, and suggest what new policies their governments should consider. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 28
Page
... scientists on 1 August 1958. The explosion, at least 20 times more powerful than the atomic bomb that incinerated Nagasaki, produced an amazing show of light, heat, radiation and electronic effects. Some of them raged over the entire ...
... scientists on 1 August 1958. The explosion, at least 20 times more powerful than the atomic bomb that incinerated Nagasaki, produced an amazing show of light, heat, radiation and electronic effects. Some of them raged over the entire ...
Page
... scientists spent decades weighing the pros and cons of attacks like this. Now others, from Baghdad to Pyongyang to Beijing, are avidly studying the arts of this kind of war. One of the most poorly understood lessons of our recent past ...
... scientists spent decades weighing the pros and cons of attacks like this. Now others, from Baghdad to Pyongyang to Beijing, are avidly studying the arts of this kind of war. One of the most poorly understood lessons of our recent past ...
Page
... scientists and the multiple layers of internal checks and fail-safe controls that kept the USA and Russia safe from nuclear misadventures may not be there to restrain the leaders of smaller nations. In our military literature, we have ...
... scientists and the multiple layers of internal checks and fail-safe controls that kept the USA and Russia safe from nuclear misadventures may not be there to restrain the leaders of smaller nations. In our military literature, we have ...
Page
... scientists and their political masters. The misjudgment by Western observers and intelligence agencies regarding the likelihood of Indian tests shows again that wishful thinking is a poor guide to the actions of players in the ...
... scientists and their political masters. The misjudgment by Western observers and intelligence agencies regarding the likelihood of Indian tests shows again that wishful thinking is a poor guide to the actions of players in the ...
Page
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Contents
HOW APPROPRIATE IS OUR RESPONSE? | |
PART III IS THERE CAUSE FOR OPTIMISM? | |
Notes on Contributors | |
Index | |
Other editions - View all
Twenty-first Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? Henry D. Sokolski,James M. Ludes Limited preview - 2001 |
Twenty-first Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? Henry D. Sokolski,James M. Ludes Limited preview - 2001 |
Twenty-First Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? James M. Ludes,Henry Sokolski Limited preview - 2014 |
Common terms and phrases
Affairs Aires American Argentina arms Asia attack Aum Shinrikyo ballistic Bangladesh become biological weapons Brazil building cent chemical and biological China civilian concern continue conventional cooperation counterproliferation countries Defense democracy democratic Department destruction East economic effective efforts Energy example experience export fact forces foreign fuel fundamentalist future groups growth important increase India initiative Institute interests International Iran Iraq Islam issues launch leading least less major March military missile Muslims nonproliferation North Korea nuclear nuclear weapons operations Pakistan peace plans plutonium political possible potential predictions Press problem production projection proliferation reactor regime regional relations Report require response result rule Russia scientists Security social South spread stockpiles strategic Studies Terrorism terrorist tests theory threats Treaty United University uranium Washington Western York