Twenty-First Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready?James M. Ludes, Henry Sokolski Routledge, 2014 M01 14 - 208 pages Leading US security practitioners fromt he Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush and Clinton administrations, plus other experts on proliferation, clarify the weapons proliferation threats that the US and its allies will face, and suggest what new policies their governments should consider. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 66
Page
... United States-Military policy. 2. World politics-21st century. 3. Weapons of mass destruction. 4. Nuclear nonproliferation. 5. Arms control. 6. Security, International. I. Sokolski, Henry. II. Ludes, James M. UA23.T877 2001 355'.033573 ...
... United States-Military policy. 2. World politics-21st century. 3. Weapons of mass destruction. 4. Nuclear nonproliferation. 5. Arms control. 6. Security, International. I. Sokolski, Henry. II. Ludes, James M. UA23.T877 2001 355'.033573 ...
Page
... and Cooperation lent support to two of the book's chapters. Finally, earlier research support was afforded by the United States Institute of Peace. Introduction: What World Awaits Us? HENRY SOKOLSKI Ten years after Acknowledgments.
... and Cooperation lent support to two of the book's chapters. Finally, earlier research support was afforded by the United States Institute of Peace. Introduction: What World Awaits Us? HENRY SOKOLSKI Ten years after Acknowledgments.
Page
... United States and Russia have taken large steps to reduce their arsenals, but they are in no rush to give them up entirely. Neither Britain, France nor China has agreed to reduce its nuclear arsenal. Nor has Israel - the undeclared ...
... United States and Russia have taken large steps to reduce their arsenals, but they are in no rush to give them up entirely. Neither Britain, France nor China has agreed to reduce its nuclear arsenal. Nor has Israel - the undeclared ...
Page
... United States and Russia have made important (and insufficiently appreciated) nuclear reductions in recent years, but the nuclear states as a whole are not yet contemplating eliminating their nuclear arsenals. At the same time, while ...
... United States and Russia have made important (and insufficiently appreciated) nuclear reductions in recent years, but the nuclear states as a whole are not yet contemplating eliminating their nuclear arsenals. At the same time, while ...
Page
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Contents
HOW APPROPRIATE IS OUR RESPONSE? | |
PART III IS THERE CAUSE FOR OPTIMISM? | |
Notes on Contributors | |
Index | |
Other editions - View all
Twenty-first Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? Henry D. Sokolski,James M. Ludes Limited preview - 2001 |
Twenty-first Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? Henry D. Sokolski,James M. Ludes Limited preview - 2001 |
Twenty-First Century Weapons Proliferation: Are We Ready? James M. Ludes,Henry Sokolski Limited preview - 2014 |
Common terms and phrases
Affairs Aires American Argentina arms Asia attack Aum Shinrikyo ballistic Bangladesh become biological weapons Brazil building cent chemical and biological China civilian concern continue conventional cooperation counterproliferation countries Defense democracy democratic Department destruction East economic effective efforts Energy example experience export fact forces foreign fuel fundamentalist future groups growth important increase India initiative Institute interests International Iran Iraq Islam issues launch leading least less major March military missile Muslims nonproliferation North Korea nuclear nuclear weapons operations Pakistan peace plans plutonium political possible potential predictions Press problem production projection proliferation reactor regime regional relations Report require response result rule Russia scientists Security social South spread stockpiles strategic Studies Terrorism terrorist tests theory threats Treaty United University uranium Washington Western York