Page images
PDF
EPUB

9. As evidenced by their letters of approval, referred to in item 8, both the mayor and the planning board, after reviewing housing conditions in this locality, are on record as favoring development of a low-income housing program.

10. Prior to the war a cooperation agreement had been executed with the city for

1. Payments in lieu of taxes in amounts not to exceed sums authorized under current policies applicable to the low-rent housing program.

2. Equivalent elimination in connection with the proposed program as required under the United States Housing Act of 1937 as amended. Due to several local factors and the war emergency this program was suspended. The local authority believes that it will be possible to obtain a similar agreement under present needs.

11. Wartime changes in the community:

(a) The war has slightly increased the need for housing due to the location of the northeast air base, known as Westover Field, and the presence of a few new industrial plants which have all the indications of thriving in the postwar period. It is not anticipated that there will be any extensive decrease in the population after the war.

(b) The method of analysis presented in part II will, we believe, produce reasonably valid information as to the poswar need for low-rent public housing.

CHICOPEE PLANNING COMMISSION, City of Chicopee, Mass., January 11, 1945.

HOME OF WESTOVER AND EXPANDING INDUSTRIES

Mr. PAUL GEISSLER,

Chicopee Housing Authority,

Chicopee, Mass.

DEAR MR. GEISSLER: The Chicopee Planning Board have gone on record in favor of low-cost housing projects in Chicopee which are to be constructed during the postwar period.

The planning board, however, wishes to have the local housing authority present its opinions and views as to locations at the public hearings to be held throughout the year on rezoning the city. Thanking you, I am as ever

Yours truly,

Anthony J. Pimentel,
ANTHONY J. PIMENTEL,
Executive Chairman,
Chicopee Postwar Planning.

PART II. NEED FOR LOW-RENT PUBLIC HOUSING AND PROPOSED 3-YEAR PROGRAM

[blocks in formation]

1. Area to which data in part II apply: Limits of the city of Chicopee, Mass.

2. Total present supply of family dwellings, excluding temporary public war housing:

(a) Supply on Apr. 1, 1940:

(1) Tenant-occupied.

(2) Owner-occupied.

(3) Vacant (racial distribution estimated).

[blocks in formation]

(c) Housing existing on Apr. 1, 1940, which has since been demolished

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

or taken out of housing use:

(1) Standard units.

(2) Substandard units.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

PART II. NEED FOR LOW-RENT PUBLIC HOUSING AND PROPOSED 3-YEAR PROGRAM-continued

[blocks in formation]

3. Total present substandard family dwellings, excluding temporary public war housing (Negroes so scattered that no districts or even individual buildings can be assigned as being Negro):

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

4. Total present vacancies in substandard housing, excluding temporary public war housing...

5. Number of families now living in substandard housing, excluding fam-
ilies living in temporary public war housing (item 3 (d) less 4).

6. Percentage distribution of gross rentals, including all utilities, in
tenant-occupied substandard family dwellings on Apr. 1, 1940:
Less than $3.

$3 to $4.

$5 to $6.

$7 to $9

$10 to $14.

$15 to $19.

$20 to $24.

$25 to $29.

$30 to $39

$40 to $49

$50 to $59

$60 to $74.

$75 to $99.

$100 and over.

Total...

7. Families living in substandard housing and paying gross rents or
rental equivalents high enough to induce private enterprise to pro-
vide an adequate supply of standard housing, either new or existing,
for their use:

(a) Lowest gross monthly rents at which new average-sized standard
dwellings for rent were being built in reasonable quantity by
private enterprise in 1940 (none were provided in any appreci-
able quantity. Figures from abutting towns):
(1) Monthly contract rent without furniture.

(2) Additional monthly cost to tenants for utilities not in-
cluded in contract rent

(3) Gross monthly rent (7 (a) (1) plus 7 (a) (2)).

(b) Lowest gross monthly rental equivalent at which new average-
sized standard dwellings for sale were being built in reasonable
quantity by private enterprise in 1940 (none-source as above):
(1) Selling price..

(2) Monthly rental equivalent without utilities.
(3) Cost per month of all utilities..

(4) Gross monthly rental equivalent 7 (b) (2) plus 7 (b) (3) -
(c) Lowest gross monthly rent cor rental equivalent at which an ad-
ditional supply of average-sized standard housing, either new or
existing, appears likely to be provided by private enterprise in
reasonably substantial quantities and available to families of
average size living in substandard housing, taking into account
any possible decreases in the cost of new dwellings below 1940
levels through improved construction methods, etc., and also
any increased availability of existing standard housing at lower
rentals due to extensive new construction...

Opinion of local housing authority and building department.
No separate water rent.

Water rent included.

[blocks in formation]

PART II. NEED FOR LOW-RENT PUBLIC HOUSING AND PROPOSED 3-YEAR PROGRAM-continued

[blocks in formation]

(d) Monthly rent, or rental value, below which the market for lowrent public housing for average-sized families lies, allowing a 20 percent margin of safety below the rental amounts shown in item 7 (c) in order to further avoid any possibility of competition with private enterprise...

Corresponding shelter rent for white, $24; nonwhite, $0.
(e) Percent of families living in substandard housing with gross
monthly rents or rental equivalents above the upper limit of the
low-rent public housing market, i. e., greater than the amounts
shown in item 7 (d) (calculate from data in item 6).
Number of such families (item 5 times percent in 7 (@)).

8. Number of vacant units of standard housing available to families
living in substandard housing, i. e., standard units with rents below
the upper limit of the low-rent public housing market (item 7 (d)).
9. Families living in substandard housing with gross rents or rental
equivalents below the lowest gross rents which can be achieved in
low-rent public housing under a system of graded rents and with
the financial assistance available under the United States Housing
Act:

(a) Lowest average monthly gross rent for all rent grades..
(b) Gross rent per month in lowest rent grade for average-sized
families (attach computing sheet at end of pt. II)

(c) Percent of families in substandard housing with gross rents or
rental equivalents below rent in item 9 (b) (calculate from
data in item 6).

(d) Number of such families (item 5 times percents in item 9 (c)) - 10. Families in the low-rent public housing market:

(a) Number of families (item 5 less 7 (f), 8, and 9 (d))..

(6) Number of families as percent of total present supply (item
10 (d) plus 20 (d)).

(c) Number of families as percent of all families living in sub-
standard housing (item 10 (a) plus 5)

11. Public housing which will become or may become available to serve
the low-rent public housing market:

(a) Low-rent public housing temporarily converted to war use (PA

412W and PA-671):

(1) Total dwellings..

(2) Less number of present tenants who will probably be
eligible for continued occupancy when these projects
revert to low-rent status.

(3) Number of dwellings which will become available as low-
rent housing (item 11 (a) (1) less 11 (a) (2).

(b) Other public war housing which the local authority would want to
acquire for use in its low-rent program if approved by the local
government and authorized by the Congress (indicate these
projects with double asterisk in the list called for in pt. I, item 4):
(1) Total dwellings.

(2) Less number of present tenants who will probably be eligi-
ble for continued occupancy if these projects revert to
low-rent status.

(3) Number of dwellings which may become available as low-
rent housing (item 11 (b) (1) less 11 (b) (2)).

(c) Low-rent public housing units under contract with PPHA but not
completed (include deferred projects) -

(d) Total dwellings (sum of items 11 (a) (3), 11 (b) (3), and 11 (c)).. 12. Net number of additional low-rent public housing units needed to accommodate families in the low-rent public housing market (item 10 (a) less 11 (a)).

13. Number of low-rent public housing units which the local authority contemplates in the 3-year program for which an allotment of funds is hereby requested:

[blocks in formation]

(a) Number of dwellings.

[blocks in formation]

(b) Number of dwellings as percent of total present supply (item
13a plus 2d).

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

PART II. NEED FOR LOW-RENT PUBLIC HOUSING AND PROPOSED 3-YEAR PROGRAM-continued

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

15. Rents in proposed 3-year program and incomes of average-sized families to be served:

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

14 rooms-2 bedrooms.

PART III. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND COST OF PROJECTS TO BE BUILT UNDER THE

PROPOSED 3-YEAR PROGRAM

1. Changes to be made based on past experience: The local authority has not developed any public housing projects to date but have in mind the inclusion of the following items in the construction of its public housing program:

(a) Design of dwellings.-Each dwelling should have an incinerator with hopper doors accessible from inside the building rather than outside. More space should be provided in each closet with doors rather than curtains. The open kitchen shelving has been found objectionable. Separate dining space apart from the kitchen is also desirable. Adequate storage space for each dwelling unit is recommended.

(b) Construction materials. As much fireproof material as is possible should be used in the construction not only for economy of maintenance, but also for permanence and durability.

(c) Heating system.-A central heating system to furnish heat and hot water to the 250 dwelling units is also recommended.

2. Number of individual projects in proposed 3-year program: The local authority program to date entails the construction of one project of 250 units for white families exclusively.

3. Type of site anticipated: It is recommended that the site now owned by the Federal Government, known as Curtis Terrace, and upon which a temporary war housing project has been built, be used for the construction of this 250 dwelling unit project. The proposed site contains 20 acres and is situated in the central portion of the city, with shopping center, schools, and industries within easy reach.

4. Types of structures: Row houses made up of four and six apartments per dwelling are contemplated.

99279-47-30

5. Density: The local authority does not have any definite recommendations to make in regard to density, but will leave that question for further study and research.

6. Size of dwellings: The following proportions of bedrooms size units are recommended in the construction of the projects in the proposed 3-year programs;

[blocks in formation]

7. Community facilities: It is the intention of the authority in the development of its future postwar low rent housing projects to include adequate community facilities such as small play areas adjacent to the structures for use of preschool children whose mothers demand that they play in the vicinity of their dwelling. It is hoped, however, that for the teen age children a large centrally located playground can be provided for organized play activities.

It is proposed that the projects would be provided with a combined management and community building which will have provisions for à large assembly hall and small social rooms in addition to space for health clinics, nursery, library, and so forth, all in proportion to the needs and size of each project.

8. Total development cost of projects:

(a) Total development cost per unit by types of sites:

On vacant land...

On semivacant land.

On slum land.......

(b) Average total development cost per unit under 3-year program_
(c) Total development cost of all projects to be built under the 3-

[blocks in formation]

$1,250,000

5,000

1,250,000

Senator BUCK. This concludes the hearings on S. 866 and other related housing bills.

(Thereupon at 12:35 p. m., the committee adjourned upon the call of the chairman.)

(The following were later received for the record:)

NATIONAL CAPITAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, Washington 25, D. C., March 27, 1947. The CHAIRMAN, UNITED STATES SENATE Banking and CURRENCY COMMITTEE, Washington, D. C.

DEAR SIR: In view of the "agitated" statement made before your committee yesterday by a representative of the National Home and Property Owners' Foundation, you may be interested in the accompanying report of the National Capital Housing Authority.

Because the witness presented figures purporting to deal with local public housing in the District of Columbia I hope you will check them with the section of this report entitled "Finance and Accounts" (p. 22), and especially the data on page 24. Among other pertinent items are NCHA's Financial Objective (p. 4) and NCHA's Rent System, Permanent and Low-Rent Housing (p. 5). The kind of doleful forecasting in which this witness indulged has been familiar since the attack upon public housing began back in 1943. (See footnote on p. 5.) Though granted three successive opportunities during hearings that extended over a full year, the opponents of public housing failed to substantiate their assertions.

This letter is submitted for the record, and the report (National Capital Housing Authority, Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1946) is for the official files of the committee.

Sincerely,

JOHN IHLDER, Executive Officer.

(Annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1946, is on file with the Senate Banking and Currency Committee.)

« PreviousContinue »