Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 11U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 54
Page 13
... Appellee at 4 n.3 ( May 6 , 2002 ) . 2 Inspector Fodo is a member of the OEPA Special Investigations Unit and conducts criminal investigations regarding the illegal disposal , transportation , and handling of solid and hazardous waste ...
... Appellee at 4 n.3 ( May 6 , 2002 ) . 2 Inspector Fodo is a member of the OEPA Special Investigations Unit and conducts criminal investigations regarding the illegal disposal , transportation , and handling of solid and hazardous waste ...
Page 22
... Appellee at 17-22 . Rather , the Region asserts that , at least for Counts III and IV , the actual statute of limitations date is March 21 , 1995. Id . 20 In the alternative , the Region argues that even if the ALJ erred when he ...
... Appellee at 17-22 . Rather , the Region asserts that , at least for Counts III and IV , the actual statute of limitations date is March 21 , 1995. Id . 20 In the alternative , the Region argues that even if the ALJ erred when he ...
Page 23
... Appellee at 13. Specifi- cally , Ms. Lyden testified that volatile organic wastes such as Capozzi's would likely evaporate quickly if , after being discharged in small amounts , they were exposed to sunlight and heat . See Tr . II at ...
... Appellee at 13. Specifi- cally , Ms. Lyden testified that volatile organic wastes such as Capozzi's would likely evaporate quickly if , after being discharged in small amounts , they were exposed to sunlight and heat . See Tr . II at ...
Page 25
... Appellee at 22. We agree . Inasmuch as the Log was prepared after both of OEPA's inspections , and its entries are inconsistent with the information provided by John Capozzi and Cindy Garris prior to the com- mencement of an enforcement ...
... Appellee at 22. We agree . Inasmuch as the Log was prepared after both of OEPA's inspections , and its entries are inconsistent with the information provided by John Capozzi and Cindy Garris prior to the com- mencement of an enforcement ...
Page 69
... Appellee ( " Region's Br . " ) . The Board held oral argument in this matter on July 30 , 2002 . II . DISCUSSION The Board reviews an administrative law judge's factual and legal conclu- sions on a de novo basis . 40 C.F.R. ยง 22.30 ( f ) ...
... Appellee ( " Region's Br . " ) . The Board held oral argument in this matter on July 30 , 2002 . II . DISCUSSION The Board reviews an administrative law judge's factual and legal conclu- sions on a de novo basis . 40 C.F.R. ยง 22.30 ( f ) ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir administrative Agency Agency's Alaska Garrison ALJ's alleged amended analysis antidegradation appeal Appellee application arctic grayling argues argument Asbestos authority BACT Board Brief Capozzi Carlota citing civil penalty Clean Water Act Complaint compliance concluded Corp Court CWPI D.C. Cir Default determination discharges draft permit economic benefit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence evidentiary hearing failed FIFRA filed Friedman & Schmitt Gibson Hasbro hazardous waste Init Initial Decision issue limit ment mg/l Microban Motion NEPA NPDES permit penalty assessment penalty factors Penalty Policy permit conditions pesticide Petition Petitioners Phoenix Pinto Creek pollutant Presiding Officer prior proposed public comment period RACM RCRA record Region Region IV Region's SEA regulations regulatory remand request requirements Respondent's Response rule specific statutory Supp Teck Cominco tion TMDL U.S. EPA USGen violations Washington Aqueduct water quality standards WECCO wetlands