Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1993: Corps of Engineers, Lower Mississippi Valley DivisionU.S. Government Printing Office, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 25
Page 1611
... Yolo Bypass , from Fremont Weir in the north to Liberty Island in the south , and includes the tributary streams of Cache Creek , Putah Creek , and Willow Slough . The Yolo Basin Wetlands project initiated in Fiscal Year 1991 , is also ...
... Yolo Bypass , from Fremont Weir in the north to Liberty Island in the south , and includes the tributary streams of Cache Creek , Putah Creek , and Willow Slough . The Yolo Basin Wetlands project initiated in Fiscal Year 1991 , is also ...
Page 1611
... Yolo Bypass 500,000 133,000 180,000 437,000 The study area is located within the limits of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Yolo and Solano Counties , California . Specifically , the study area extends along the Yolo Bypass ...
... Yolo Bypass 500,000 133,000 180,000 437,000 The study area is located within the limits of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Yolo and Solano Counties , California . Specifically , the study area extends along the Yolo Bypass ...
Page 1612
... Yolo Bypass ( Cont'd ) $ 2,000,000 500,000 750,000 750,000 Additional to Complete After FY 1993 The reconnaissance ... Basin 590,000 288,000 250,000 442,000 The study area is located between the Feather and American River Basins in ...
... Yolo Bypass ( Cont'd ) $ 2,000,000 500,000 750,000 750,000 Additional to Complete After FY 1993 The reconnaissance ... Basin 590,000 288,000 250,000 442,000 The study area is located between the Feather and American River Basins in ...
Page 1636
... Bypass , and the Yolo Bypass from Fremont Weir to Freeport are also part of the project area . about $ 36 billion . Flood events could potentially impact more than 387,000 people and property valued at Folsom Lake and existing levees ...
... Bypass , and the Yolo Bypass from Fremont Weir to Freeport are also part of the project area . about $ 36 billion . Flood events could potentially impact more than 387,000 people and property valued at Folsom Lake and existing levees ...
Page 1716
... Yolo Bypass (. LOCATION : The project is located on the Sacramento River and the lower reaches of its principal tributaries in north - central California . The project extends from Collinsville near the mouth of the Sacramento River ...
... Yolo Bypass (. LOCATION : The project is located on the Sacramento River and the lower reaches of its principal tributaries in north - central California . The project extends from Collinsville near the mouth of the Sacramento River ...
Common terms and phrases
acres Allocation for FY Allocation FY 1992 Allocation Prior APPROPRIATION TITLE Balance to Complete bear all costs BENEFIT-COST RATIO BEVILL budget California Cash Contribution channel Complete After FY Cont'd continue Corps of Engineers COST RATIO cost sharing costs allocated County Creek District 29 JAN easements engineering and design Entire Project Environmental Impact Statement Estimated Federal Cost Estimated FY 1992 Estimated Non-Federal Cost feasibility phase feasibility study FEDERAL COST ESTIMATES feet Fiscal Year 1993 fish and wildlife flood control flood damages FY 1992 Allocation Harbor Harvey Canal includes Lake levee located Louisiana miles million Mississippi River Commission Mississippi Valley Division navigation non-Federal sponsor Operation and Maintenance percent Phase Federal Prado Dam preconstruction engineering Programmed Construction reconnaissance phase Resources Development Act Sacramento River Santa Ana River scheduled for completion South Pacific District South Pacific Division SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL DATA Total Operations Tributaries Unprogrammed Balance Water Resources Development YANKOUPE Yolo Bypass
Popular passages
Page xv - ... (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, no civil penalty shall be imposed if it can be shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed an act based on a good faith belief that he was acting to protect himself or herself, a member of his or her family, or any other individual from bodily harm, from any endangered or threatened species.
Page xx - The known lineal descendant or culturally affiliated Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization presents evidence which, if standing alone before the introduction of evidence to the contrary, would support a finding that the...
Page xv - The ownership or control of Native American cultural items which are excavated or discovered on Federal or tribal lands after the date of enactment of this Act shall be (with priority given in the order listed) — (1) in the case of Native American human remains and associated funerary objects, in the lineal descendants of the Native American; or (2) in any case in which such lineal descendants cannot be ascertained, and in the case of unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of...
Page 1247 - Levees project is a component of the main stem system for the control of floods on the Mississippi River. The levee system provides protection to 23,620 square miles and partial protection to an additional 3,780 square miles in the alluvial valley subject to flooding by the project flood. The value of lands and improvements protected by authorized works against the design flood is $131.1 billion in 1997 dollars.
Page xxiii - Hawaiian organizations, or individuals, and (B) enter into any other agreement with the consent of the culturally affiliated tribe or organization as to the disposition of, or control over, items covered by this Act; (2) delay actions on repatriation requests that are pending on the date of enactment of this Act; (3) deny or otherwise affect access to any court; (4) limit any procedural or substantive right which may otherwise be secured to individuals or Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations;...
Page xxiii - The United States district courts shall have jurisdiction over any action brought by any person alleging a violation of this Act and shall have the authority to issue such orders as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of this Act.
Page xx - Federal agency or museum cannot clearly determine which requesting party is the most appropriate claimant, the agency or museum may retain such item until the requesting parties agree upon its disposition or the dispute is otherwise resolved pursuant to the provisions of this Act or by a court of competent jurisdiction. (f) Museum Obligation — Any museum which repatriates any item in good faith pursuant to this Act shall not be liable for claims by an aggrieved party or for claims of breach of...
Page xx - Federal agency or museum shall expeditiously return such items unless such items are indispensable for completion of a specific scientific study, the outcome of which would be of major benefit to the United States.
Page xxiii - BETWEEN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND INDIAN TRIBES. This Act reflects the unique relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes- and Native Hawaiian organizations and should not be construed to establish a precedent with respect to any other individual, organization or foreign government. 25 USC 3011.
Page 2350 - Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) as amended by Section 933 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorizes the placement of beach-quality sand onto adjacent beaches from the accomplishment of maintenance dredging of navigation projects.