Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Speaker Dashiell until Monday, on motion of Mr. Hill of Travis.

Mr. Rogers until Monday, on motion of Mr. Good.

On motion of Mr. Garrison, W. J. Townsend, committee clerk, was excused indefinitely, on account of the death of his mother.

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE. Senate Chamber.

Austin, Texas, 1. 4, 1897. Hon. L. T. Dashiell, Speaker of the House.

Sir: I am instructed by the Senate to inform the House that the Senate has passed the following hills:

Senate bill No. 13, a bill to be entitled "An act to abolish the unorganized counties of Buchel and Foley and incorporate their territory in the county of Brewster, to provide for the payment of certain bonds held by the State against said unorganized counties out of funds now on hand to their credit, and for the transfer and payment of the balance of said funds to the proper officers and said Brewster county,"

Senate bill No. 23, a bill to be enti

tled "An act to provide a mode of service binding upon the inhabitants of any town or village to whom land grants have been made, and which are not otherwise incorporated, in suits brought in relation to said lands, and to regulate proceedings thereunder."

Senate bill No. 52, a bill to be entitled "An act to require every express company to keep a general office in this State, and to furnish such information in relation to its property, indebtedness and business as may be required by the Railroad Commission of Texas."

Senate bill No. 82, a bill to be entitled "An act to amend article 256 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, relating to applications for license to practice law."

Also, Senate concurrent resolution No. 6, providing for the appointment of a joint committee to visit the State penitentiaries and other penal institu

tions.

Also, Senate concurrent resolution No. 7:

Be it resolved by the Senate, the House of Representatives concurring, that the joint rules for the government of the Senate and House of Representatives adopted by the Twentyfourth Legislature be adopted as the joint rules of the Twenty-fifta Legis

lature.

Respectfully,

WILL LAMBERT, Secretary.

SENATE BILLS ON FIRST READ

READING.

The following bills, received from the Senate, were read first time and referred as follows:

Senate bill No. 82, to Judiciary Com

mittee No. 1.

Senate bill No. 23, to the Committee on Towns and City Corporations. Senate bill No. 52, to the Committee on Internal Improvements.

Senate bill No. 13, to the Committee on Counties and County Boundaries.

BILL WITHDRAWN.

had

Mr. Blair raised the point of order that the motion to table was out of order for the reason that by adopting the majority report, the House adopted the amendments recommended in that report, making them thereby a part of the bill.

The point of order was overruled. Mr. Blair appealed from the ruling of the Chair, which appeal was seconded by Mr. Wolters.

Upon the question, shall the chair be sustained, yeas and nays were demanded by Mr. Blair, Mr. Wolters and Mr. Vaughan of Collin.

The ruling of the Chair was sus

House bill No. 249, on request of Mr. tained by the following vote: Carpenter.

[blocks in formation]

Yeas-71.

Lillard.

Logan.

Love.

Maxwell.

House bill No. 170, on mouon of Mr.

Benson.

[blocks in formation]

McGaughey.
McKamy.

(Mr. Ward in the chair.)

[blocks in formation]

UNFINISHED BUSINESS.

[blocks in formation]

When the House adjourned yester- Brown. day, it had under consideration House Burns. bill No. 90, on its engrossment.

Pending question, committee amend- | Childs. ment No. 2, to strike out section 4 Collier. and substitute the following in lieu Crawford. thereof:

Crowley.
Cureton.
Curry.
Dean.
Dies.
Dorroh.
Doyle.

"Section 4. When such appointments are to be made the State Dental Association shall suggest to the Governor twice as many names as there are appointments to be made, and from them the Governor shall select the members of said board, and the same Ewing. shall be submitted to the Senate for Fields of Hill. confirmation. Upon confirmation by Fisher. the Senate they shall be empowered Freeman. by law and authorized to discharge Garrison. the duties encumbent upon them by Gilbough. this act. Each member of this board Graham. shall be appointed for the term or two years, and hold the appointment until his successor is appointed. In case of vacancy occurring by resignation, removal from State, or by death, such vacancy may be filled for the unexpired term by the Governor."

The Speaker laid the same before the House.

Green.

[blocks in formation]

Hill of Gonzales.
Hill of Travis. Wallace.
Holland of Burnet. Wilcox.
Humphrey.
Williams.
Jones.
Wood.
Kimbell.

[blocks in formation]

Moore, Fort Bend. Robbins.

SPECIAL ORDER.

Moore of Lamar. Shelburne.

Sluder.

Neighbors.

[blocks in formation]

The motion to table the second committee amendment prevailed.

The third, fourth and fifth committee amendments were then read and adopted seriatim, as follows:

(3) "Sec. 4a. Before entering upon the duties of this office each and every member of this board shall make oath before any officer authorized to administer an obligation, who shall be empowered to use a seal of office, that he will faithfully discharge the duties incumbent upon him to the best of his ability. The same shall be filed for record with the county clerk in the county in which affiant resides. The county clerk shall receive for recording the same 50 cents.

[blocks in formation]

Contest election case of A. F. Brigance v. I. M. Bennett.

the

On Tuesday, February 2nd, Committee on Privileges and Elections, which had this case under consideration, made report to ne House, submitting a majority report recommending that A. F. Brigance, contestant, be seated, and that I. M. Bennett, contestee, be unseated; and a minority report recommending that I. M. Bennett be declared the duly elected Representative from Grimes county, and that should this House in its judgment from the facts thus far introduced be not satisfied that said contestee is the duly elected Representative from Grimes county, then we ask that this case be recommitted, with instructions to further investigate the same and to hear additional testimony fully and impartially to both contestant and contestee.

were

Both these reports, which printed in full in the Journal of Tuesday, February 2, and which were on that day made a special order for today at 10 o'clock a. m., were laid before the House and were read.

Mr. Lillard, by unanimous consent, called up the following resolution, which was yesterday spread upon the Journal and went over under the rules:

Whereas, in the contested election case of Brigance vs. Bennett, now pending before this House from the Fifty-fourth Representative District, the fact has developed, upon a recount of the ballots of and from said Fiftyfourth District by the committee, that in two precincts of said district, viz., Plantersville and Pointer's Prairie, there is a very serious discrepancy or difference between the result of said recount of the ballots by the committee and the result as shown by the poll lists, tally sheets and returns, as sworn to by the presiding officers. judges and clerks of elections in and for said precincts, and a copy of which was kept in the hands of the presiding officer of each precinct (as required by law), and which has been identified, sworn to and presented in evidence before the committee as reflecting the true result of an election as held in their respective precincts on November 3, 1896, for the office of Representative for the Fifty-fourth District.

And whereas, a duplicate copy of said poll lists, tally sheets and returns were found in each box by the committee, duly executed and sworn to by the election officers, which is found

to show the same result as the copy held by the presiding officers and by them turned over to the committee.

And whereas, the ballot box from one of the aforesaid precincts, viz., Plantersville, was open or loose when the same was delivered to the Sergeant-at-Arms of this House by the county clerk of Grimes, as is shown by the testimony of said clerk before the committee.

And whereas, the contestee in this case, I. M. Bennett, does aver that he can and will at his own expense prove to this House by the voluntary affidavits of the voters of said Plantersville and Pointer's Prairie precincts that the ballots as now contained in said ballot boxes do not reflect the true result of the election held in their respective precincts for the office of Representative on the 3d day of November, 1896, but that the ballot boxes have been tampered with, and ballots taken out and other ballots substituted for same, to the detriment and injury of said contestee; and he further avers that he can and will prove as above indicated, that at Iola box, precinct No. 2, I. M. Bennett received about 40 votes upon what is known as the "cocked hat ticket," when in fact it is shown by the recount of the ballots in said box that there are now only 11 of the said tickets in the said box.

And whereas, the said I. M. Bennett has received the depositions of the presiding officer and two of the judges of the election held November 3 last, at said Pointer's Prairie box, all of whom swear that the vote cast for Bennett and Brigance, respectively, was exactly as it was certified to on the tally sheets sent up to the county seat of Grimes county, and verified by the several election judges of said county who appeared before the committee on Privileges and Elections here, said election officers declaring in their affidavit that if the count of the tickets made here did not accord with the figures on the tally sheet, then the ballot box had been tampered with after it had left their hands;

And whereas, it is and should be the purpose and desire of this House to do even and exact justice to each part in every election contest case; therefore be it

[blocks in formation]

Resolved, That the House do hereby Fields. grant the request of I. M. Bennett. Freeman. giving him one week's time in which | Gilbough. to produce further evidence in his be- Good. half, in the shape of voluntary depo- Green. sitions of voters, which evidence he Harris.

Rudd.

Savage.

Schlick.

Seabury. Shropshire. Sluder. Smyth. Stamper.

Staples.

Strother.

Thompson.

Tracy.

Turner.

Wallace.

Ward.

Wilcox.

Williams.

Wolters.

Vaughan, Gua'lupe Wood.

Vaughan of Collin.

Absent.

Edwards.

Neighbors.

Thaxton.
Welch.

Reubell.

Excused.

Alexander.

Randolph.

[blocks in formation]

will subserve no good purpose, for the reason that if every voter in Grimes I county should swear to his ticket and thus sustain election tally sheet and returns as originially certified to by said election officers, it would not change the result or affect contestant's legal right to his seat; because I contend that the cocked-hat ticket is a vicious ballot, amounting in its nature to a device, by reason of the character of paper upon which it is printed and manner in which said ticket was folded, and should not be counted. The tabulated statement of the result of the count of the ballot to exclude the cockedhat ticket shows Brigance elected by a large majority, and

Present and excused (under Rule 15) should accordingly be seated without from voting-Mr. Bennett. further delay.

CROWLEY.

Mr. Fields moved to adjourn until 9 o'clock a. m. to-morrow, and the motion was lost.

We vote no, because we believe the committee has given a fair and impartial hearing to the parties to this contest, and it would be a reflection Mr. Burney moved that attorneys on the honesty and sincerity of the for contestant and contestee be alcommittee, and add additional ex-lowed one hour each on the floor of pense to the State, to reopen the case, as all the evidence goes to show that the committee acted without favor or prejudice against either party.

OLIVER,
MARTIN.

I vote no, because I see no chance for additional testimony that would affect this case. SAVAGE.

I vote "aye" for the following rea

sons:

1st. The cocked-hat tickets have been decided by the Supreme Court in a case in 1895, entitled State vs. Philip, 63 Texas Reports, that tickets folded in the manner described were legal and should be counted.

2d. The opening of the ballot boxes operated to introduce new testimony after the issue had been joined and the grounds mapped out.

3d. The contestee simply asks the opportunity to prove that the returns as made from the Pointer's Prairie box were "doctored," and in my opinion it is in the interest of good government to have the voice of the people of Grimes county known and respected and obeyed. If the ballto boxes were "stuffed," as alleged by the officers who counted the ballots, and who were Democrats. it is the duty of the Legislature to ferret this out. surprising to me that a party so largely in the majority should refuse to allow further investigation.

It is

SMITH.

I vote no upon this question, because I think a postponement of this case

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »