"With this view, and for the reasons which have been stated, I do hereby solemnly protest against the aforementioned proceedings of the Senate, as unauthorized by the constitution; contrary to its spirit and to several of its express provisions; subversive of that distribution of the powers of government which it has ordained and established; destructive of the checks and safeguards by which those powers were intended, on the one hand, to be controlled, and, on the other, to be protected; and calculated, by their immediate and collateral effects, by their character and tendency, to concentrate in the hands of a body not directly amenable to the people, a degree of influence and power dangerous to their liberties, and fatal to the constitution of their choice."

And it concluded with an affecting appeal to his private history for the patriotism and integrity of his life, and the illustration of his conduct in relation to the bank, and showed his reliance on God and the People to sustain him; and looked with confidence to the place which justice would assign him on the page of history. This moving peroration was in these words:

and usurpers expiate their crimes. The only ambition I can feel, is to acquit myself to Him to whom I must soon render an account of my stewardship, to serve my fellow-men, and live respected and honored in the history of my country. No; the ambition which leads me on, is an anxious desire and a fixed determination, to return to the people, unimpaired, the sacred trust they have confided to my chargeto heal the wounds of the constitution and preserve it from further violation; to persuade my countrymen, so far as I may, that it is not in a splendid government, supported by powerful monopolies and aristocratical establishments, that they will find happiness, or their liberties protected, but in a plain system, void of pomp -protecting all, and granting favors to nonedispensing its blessings like the dews of heaven, unseen and unfelt, save in the freshness and beauty they contribute to produce. It is such a government that the genius of our people requires-such a one only under which our States may remain for ages to come, united, prosperous, and free. If the Almighty Being who has hitherto sustained and protected me, will but vouchsafe to make my feeble powers instrumental to such a result, I shall anticipate with pleasure the place to be assigned me in the history of my country, and die contented with the belief, that I have contributed in some small degree, to increase the value and prolong the duration of American liberty.

tion may be known to my fellow-citizens, to the world, and to all posterity, I respectfully request that this message and protest may be entered at length on the journals of the Senate.”

"The resolution of the Senate contains an imputation upon my private as well as upon my public character; and as it must stand for ever on their journals, I cannot close this substitute "To the end that the resolution of the Sefor that defence which I have not been allowed nate may not be hereafter drawn into precedent, to present in the ordinary form, without remark-with the authority of silent acquiescence on the ing, that I have lived in vain, if it be necessary part of the Executive department; and to the to enter into a formal vindication of my charac-end, also, that my motives and views in the ter and purposes from such an imputation. In Executive proceeding denounced in that resoluvain do I bear upon my person, enduring memorials of that contest in which American liberty was purchased; in vain have I since perilled property, fame, and life, in defence of the rights and privileges so dearly bought: in vain am I now, without a personal aspiration, or the hope No sooner was this Protest read in the Senate of individual advantage, encountering responsi- than it gave rise to a scene of the greatest exbilities and dangers, from which, by mere in-citement. Mr. Poindexter, of Mississippi, immeactivity in relation to a single point, I might diately assailed it as a breach of the privileges of have been exempt-if any serious doubts can be entertained as to the purity of my purposes the Senate, and unfit to be received by the body. and motives. If I had been ambitious, I should He said: "I will not dignify this paper by conhave sought an alliance with that powerful in- sidering it in the light of an Executive message: stitution, which even now aspires to no divided empire. If I had been venal, I should have it is no such thing. I regard it simply as a sold myself to its designs. Had I preferred paper, with the signature of Andrew Jackson; personal comfort and official ease to the perform-and, should the Senate refuse to receive it, it ance of my arduous duty, I should have ceased will not be the first paper with the same signato molest it. In the history of conquerors and usurpers, never, in the fire of youth, nor in the vigor of manhood, could I find an attraction to lure me from the path of duty; and now, I shall scarcely find an inducement to commence the career of ambition, when gray hairs and a decaying frame, instead of inviting to toil and battle, call me to the contemplation of other worlds, where conquerors cease to be honored,

ture which has been refused a hearing in this body, on the ground of the abusive and vituperative language which it contained. This effort to denounce and overawe the deliberations of the Senate may properly be regarded as capping the climax of that systematic plan of operations which had for several years been in progress,

designed to bring this body into disrepute among the people, and thereby remove the only existing barrier to the arbitrary encroachments and usurpations of Executive power:"-and he moved that the paper, as he called it, should not be received. Mr. Benton deemed this a proper occasion to give notice of his intention to move a strong measure which he contemplated-an expunging resolution against the sentence of the Senate:-a determination to which he had come

sense of duty in making a motion to that effect, and in encouraging others after he was gone, in following up that motion to success, it would be found in the history and termination of the similar motion which was made in the English House of Commons to which he had referred. That motion was renewed for fourteen years-from 1768 to 1782-before it was successful. For the first seven years, the lofty and indignant majority did not condescend to reply to the motion. They sunk it under a dead vote as often as presented. The second seven years from his own convictions of right, and which he they replied; and at the end of the term, and now announced without consultation with any veteran motion was carried by more than two on the assembling of a new Parliament, the of his friends. He deemed this movement too to one; and the gratifying spectacle was beheld bold to be submitted to a council of friends-too of a public expurgation, in the face of the asdaring to expect their concurrence;-and believed sembled Commons of England, of the obnoxious resolution from the Journal of the House. The it was better to proceed without their know- elections in England were septennial, and it ledge, than against their decision. He, there- took two terms of seven years, or two general fore, delivered his notice ex abruptu, accom- elections, to bring the sense of the kingdom to panied by an earnest invective against the con- bear upon their representatives. The elections duct of the Senate; and committed himself irre-exits and entrances, and it might take a less, or of the Senate were sexennial, with intercalary vocably to the prosecution of the "expunging resolution" until he should succeed in the effort, or terminate his political life: He said:

The public mind was now to be occupied with a question of the very first moment and importance, and identical in all its features with the great question growing out of the famous resolutions of the English House of Commons in the case of the Middlesex election in the year 1768; and which engrossed the attention of the British empire for fourteen years before it was settled. That question was one in which the House of Commons was judged, and condemned, for adopting a resolution which was held by the subjects of the British crown to be a violation of their constitution, and a subversion of the rights of Englishmen: the question now before the Senate, and which will go before the American people, grows out of a resolution in which he (Mr. B.) believed that the constitution had been violated-the privileges of the House of Representatives invaded-and the rights of an American citizen, in the person of the President, subverted. The resolution of the House of Commons, after fourteen years of annual motions, was expunged from the Journal of the House; and he pledged himself to the American people to commence a similar series of motions with respect to this resolution of the Senate. He had made up his mind to do so without consultation with any human being, and without deigning to calculate the chances or the time of success. He rested under the firm conviction that the resolution of the Senate, which had drawn from the President the calm, temperate, and dignified protest, which had been read at the table, was a resolution which ought to be expunged from the Journal of the Senate; and if any thing was necessary to stimulate his

a longer period, he would not presume to say which, to bring the sense of the American people to bear upon an act of the American Senate. Of that, he would make no calculation; but the final success of the motion in the English House of Commons, after fourteen years' perseverance, was a sufficient encouragement for him to begin, and doubtless would encourage others to continue, until the good work should be crowned with success; and the only atonement made. which it was in the Senate's power to make, to the violated majesty of the constitution, the invaded privileges of the House of Representatives, and the subverted rights of an American citizen.

"In bringing this great question before the American people, Mr. B. should consider himself as addressing the calm intelligence of an enlightened community. He believed the body of the American people to be the most enlightened community upon earth; and, without the least disparagement to the present Senate, he must be permitted to believe that many such Senates might be drawn from the ranks of the people, and still leave no dearth of intelligence behind. To such a community-in an appeal, on a great question of constitutional law, to the understandings of such a people-declamation, passion, epithets, opprobrious language, would stand for nothing. They would float, harmless and unheeded, through the empty air, and strike in vain upon the ear of a sober and dispassionate tribunal. Indignation, real or affected; wrath, however hot; fury, however enraged; asseverations, however violent; denunciation, however furious; will avail nothing. Facts-inexorable facts-are all that will be attended to; reason, calm and self-possessed, is all that will be listened to. An intelligent tribunal will exact the respect of an address to their understandings; and he that wishes to be heard in this great

question, or being heard, would, wish to be heeded, will have occasion to be clear and correct in his facts; close and perspicuous in his application of law; fair and candid in his conclusions and inferences; temperate and decorous in his language; and scrupulously free from every taint of vengeance and malice. Solemnly impressed with the truth of all these convictions, it was the intention of himself (Mr. B.), whatever the example or the provocation might be never to forget his place, his subject, his audience, and his object-never to forget that he was speaking in the American Senate, on a question of violated constitution and outraged individual right, to an audience comprehending the whole body of the American people, and for the purpose of obtaining a righteous decision from the calm and sober judgment of a high-minded, intelligent, and patriotic community.

tack him, young and old, boys and men-attacks echoing the very sound of this resolution, and which are not only received and filed here, but printed, which, possibly, the twenty-six could not unite here, nor go to trial upon any where! He remarked, in the third place, upon the effect produced in the character of the resolution, and affirmed that it was nothing. He said that the same charge ran through all three. They all three imputed to the President a violation of the constitution and laws of the country-of that constitution which he was sworn to support, and of those laws which he was not only bound to observe himself, but to cause to be faithfully observed by all others.

"A violation of the constitution and of the laws, Mr. B. said, were not abstractions and metaphysical subtleties. They must relate to persons or things. The violations cannot rest in the air; they must affix themselves to men or to "The question immediately before the Senate property; they must connect themselves with was one of minor consequence; it might be the transactions of real life. They cannot be called a question of small import, except for ideal and contemplative. In omitting the spethe effect which the decision might have upon cifications relative to the dismission of one the Senate itself. In that point of view, it Secretary of the Treasury, and the appointment might be a question of some moment; for, with- of another, what other specifications were adoptout reference to individuals, it was essential to ed or substituted? Certainly none! What the cause of free governments, that every de- others were mentally intended? Surely none! partment of the government, the Senate inclu- What others were suggested? Certainly none! sive, should so act as to preserve to itself the The general charge then rests upon the same respect and the confidence of the country. The specification; and so completely is this the fact, immediate question was, upon the rejection of that no supporter of the resolutions has thought the President's message. It was moved to it necessary to make the least alteration in his reject it to reject it, not after it was considered, speeches which supported the original resolubut before it was considered! and thus to tell tion, or to say a single additional word in favor the American people that their President shall of the altered resolution as finally passed. The not be heard-should not be allowed to plead omission of the specification is then an omission his defence-in the presence of the body that of form and not of substance; it is a change of condemned him-neither before the condemna- words and not of things; and the substitution tion, nor after it! This is the motion: and of a derogation of the laws and constitution, certainly no enemy to the Senate could wish it for dangerous to the liberties of the people, is a to miscarry. The President, in the conclusion still more flagrant instance of change of words of his message, has respectfully requested that without change of things. It is tautologous his defence might be entered upon the Journal and nonsensical. It adds nothing to the general of the Senate upon that same Journal which charge, and takes nothing from it. It neither contains the record of his conviction. This is explains it nor qualifies it. In the technical the request of the President. Will the Senate sense it is absurd; for it is not the case of a deny it? Will they refuse this act of sheer statute in derogation of the common law, to justice and common decency? Will they go wit, repealing a part of it; in the common parfurther, and not only refuse to place it on the lance understanding, it is ridiculous, for the Journal, but refuse even to suffer it to remain President is not even charged with defaming in the Senate? Will they refuse to permit it the constitution and the laws; and, if he was to remain on file, but send it back, or throw it so charged, it would present a curious trial of out of doors, without condescending to reply to scandalum magnatum for the American Senate it? For that is the exact import of the motion to engage in. No! said Mr. B., this derogation now made! Will senators exhaust their minds, clause is an expletion! It is put in to fill up! and their bodies also, in loading this very com- The regular impeaching clause of dangerous to munication with epithets, and then say that it the liberties of the people, had to be taken out. shall not be received? Will they receive me- There was danger, not in the people certainly, morials, resolutions, essays, from all that choose but to the character of the resolution, if it staid to abuse the President, and not receive a word in. It identified that resolution as an imof defence from him? Will they continue the peachment, and, therefore, constituted a piece spectacle which had been presented here for of internal evidence which it was necessary to three months-a daily presentation of attacks withdraw; but in withdrawing which, the chaupon the President from all that choose to at-racter of the resolution was not altered. The

charge for violating the laws and the constitution still stood; and the substituted clause was nothing but a stopper to a vacuum-additional sound without additional sense, to fill up a blank and round off a sentence.

Mr. Duane could not be restored by law, nor Mr. Taney be put out by law. It was to convict the President of violating the constitution and the laws; and surely these infractions are not to be amended by laws, but avenged by trial and punishment. The very nature of the resolution proves it to be foreign to all legislation; its form proves the same thing; for it is not joint, to require the action of the House of Repfollowed by an instruction to a committee to report a bill in conformity to it. No such instruction could even now be added without committing an absurdity of the most ridiculous character. There was another resolution, with which this must not be confounded, and upon which an instruction to a committee might have been bottomed; it was the resolution which declared the Secretary's reasons for removing the deposits to be insufficient and unsatisfactory; but no such instruction has been bottom

"After showing the impeaching character of the Senate's resolution, from its own internal evidence, Mr. B. had recourse to another description of evidence, scarcely inferior to the resolutions themselves, in the authentic inter-resentatives, and thus ripen into law; nor is it pretations of their meaning. He alluded to the speeches made in support of them, and which had resounded in this chamber for three months, and were now circulating all over the country in every variety of newspaper and pamphlet form. These speeches were made by the friends of the resolution to procure its adoption here, and to justify its adoption before the country. Let the country then read, let the people read, what has been sent to them for the purpose of justifying these resolutions which they are now to try! They will find them to be in the cha-ed even upon that resolution; so that it is eviracter of prosecution pleadings against an accused man, on his trial for the commission of great crimes ! Let them look over these speeches, and mark the passages; they will find language ransacked, history rummaged, to find words sufficiently strong, and examples sufficiently odious, to paint and exemplify the enormity of the crime of which the President was alleged to be guilty. After reading these passages, let any one doubt, if he can, as to the character of the resolution which was adopted. Let him doubt, if he can, of the impeachable nature of the offence which was charged upon the President. Let him doubt, if he can, that every Senator who voted for that resolution, voted the President to be guilty of an impeachable offence-an offence, for the trial of which this Senate is the appointed tribunal-an offence which it will be the immediate duty of the House of Representatives to bring before the Senate, in a formal impeachment, unless they disbelieve in the truth and justice of the resolution which has been adopted.

"Mr. B. said there were three characters in which the Senate could act; and every time it acted it necessarily did so in one or the other of these characters. It possessed executive, legislative, and judicial characters. As a part of the executive, it acted on treaties and nominations to office; as a part of the legislative, it assisted in making laws; as a judicial tribunal, it decided impeachments. Now, in which of these characters did the Senate act when it adopted the resolution in question? Not in its executive character, it will be admitted; not in its legislative character, it will be proved: for the resolution was, in its nature, wholly foreign to legislation. It was directed, not to the formation of a law, but to the condemnation of the President. It was to condemn him for dismissing one Secretary, because he would not do a thing, and appointing another that he might do it; and certainly this was not matter for legislation; for

dent that no legislation of any kind was intended to follow either resolution, even that to which legislation might have been appropriate, much less that to which it would have been an absurdity. Four months have elapsed since the resolutions were brought in. In all that time, there has been no attempt to found a legislative act upon either of them; and it is too late now to assume that the one which, in its nature and in its form, is wholly foreign to legislation, is a legislative act, and adopted by the Senate in its legislative character. No! This resolution is judicial; it is a judgment pronounced upon an imputed offence; it is the declared sense of a majority of the Senate, of the guilt of the President of a high crime and misdemeanor. It is, in substance, an impeachment-an impeachment in violation of all the forms prescribed by the constitution-in violation of the privileges of the House of Representatives-in subversion of the rights of the accused, and the record of which ought to be expunged from the Journal of the Senate.

"Mr. B. said the selection of a tribunal for the trial of impeachments was felt, by the convention which framed the constitution, as one of the most delicate and difficult tasks which they had to perform. Those great men were well read in history, both ancient and modern, and knew that the impeaching power-the usual mode for trying political men for political offences-was often an engine for the gratification of factious and ambitious feelings. An impeachment was well known to be the beaten road for running down a hated or successful political rival. After great deliberation-after weighing all the tribunals, even that of the Supreme Court-the Senate of the United States was fixed upon as the body which, from its constitution, would be the most impartial, neutral, and equitable, that could be selected, and, with the check of a previous inquisition, and presentment of charges by the House of Representa

tives, would be the safest tribunal to which could be confided a power so great in itself, and so susceptible of being abused. The Senate was selected; and to show that he had not overstated the difficulties of the convention in making the selection, he would take leave to read a passage from a work which was canonical on this subject, and from an article in that work which was written by the gentleman whose authority would have most weight on this occasion. He spoke of the Federalist, and of the article written by General Hamilton on the impeaching power:

Hamilton. It imputes misconduct to a public man, for the abuse and violation of a public trust. The discussion of the charge has agitated the passions of the whole community; it has divided the people into parties, some friendly, some inimical, to the accused; it has connected itself with the pre-existing parties, enlisting the whole of the opposition parties under one banner, and calling forth all their animosities-all their partialities-all their influence-all their interest; and, what was not foreseen by General Hamilton, it has called forth the tremendous moneyed power, and the pervading organization of a great moneyed power, wielding a mass of forty millions of money, and sixty millions of debt; wielding the whole in aid and support of this charge upon the President, and working the double battery of seduction, on one hand, and oppression on the other, to put down the man against whom it is directed! This is what General Hamilton did not foresee; but the next feature in the picture he did foresee, and most accurately describe, as it is now seen by us all. He said that the decision of these impeachments would ofter be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties than by the guilt or innocence of the accused. How prophetic! Look to the memorials, resolutions, and petitions, sent in here to criminate the President, so clearly

"A well-constituted court for the trial of impeachments is an object not more to be desired than difficult to be obtained, in a government wholly elective. The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men; or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may, with peculiar propriety, be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to society itself. The prosecution of them, for this reason, will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused. In many cases, it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influence, and in-marked by a party line, that when an exception terest, on one side or on the other; and, in such cases, there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt. The delicacy and magnitude of a trust which so deeply concerns the political reputation and existence of every man engaged in the administration of public affairs, speak for themselves. The difficulty of placing it rightly in a government resting entirely on the basis of periodical elections, will as readily be perceived, when it is considered that the most conspicuous charac-ing impeachments, not in the Supreme Court, ters in it will, from that circumstance, be too often the leaders or the tools of the most cunning or the most numerous faction; and, on this account, can hardly be expected to possess the requisite neutrality towards those whose conduct may be the subject of scrutiny.

"The division of the powers of impeachment between the two branches of the legislature, assigning to one the right of accusing, to the other the right of trying, avoids the inconvenience of making the same persons both accusers and judges; and guards against the danger of persecution from the prevalency of a factious spirit in either of those branches.'

"Mr. B. said there was much matter for elucidation of the present object of discussion in the extract which he had read. Its definition of an impeachable offence covered the indentical charge which was contained in the resolution adopted by the Senate against the President. The offence charged upon him possessed every feature of the impeachment defined by General

occurs, it is made the special subject of public remark. Look at the vote in the Senate, upon the adoption of the resolution, also as clearly defined by a party line as any party question can ever be expected to be.

"To guard the most conspicuous characters from being persecuted-Mr. B. said he was using the language of General Hamilton-to guard the most conspicuous characters from being persecuted by the leaders or the tools of the most cunning or the most numerous faction the convention had placed the power of try

not even in a body of select judges chosen for the occasion, but in the Senate of the United States, and not even in them without an intervening check to the abuse of that power, by associating the House of Representatives, and forbidding the Senate to proceed against any officer until that grand inquest of the nation should demand his trial. How far fortunate, or otherwise, the convention may have been in the selection of its tribunal for the trial of impeachments, it was not for him, Mr. B., to say. It was not for him to say how far the requisite neutrality towards those whose conduct may be under scrutiny, may be found, or has been found, in this body. But he must take leave to say, that if a public man may be virtually impeached-actually condemned by the Senate of an impeachable offence, without the intervention of the House of Representatives. then has the constitution failed at one of its most vital points, and a ready means found for doing a thing which had filled other countries with persecu