 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources - 1997 - 144 pages
...Declaration" (up to and including the meeting of COP-2 at which the draft was presented), which of the Annex I nations favored, and which resisted or...that its demand for the phrase "legally binding" was "nonnegotiable" (or words to that effect)? Answer. Australia, New Zealand and Russia expressed concerns... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources - 1997 - 144 pages
...similar commitments. Question (cXv). If a protocol or another legal instrument contains commitments for quantified legally-binding objectives for emission...significant overall reductions within specified timeframes, would it be in the interests of the United States for the protocol or another legal instrument to contain... | |
 | Sebastian Oberthür, Hermann E. Ott - 1999 - 388 pages
...industry, agriculture, forestry, waste management, economic instruments, institutions and mechanisms; * quantified legally-binding objectives for emission...significant overall reductions within specified time-frames, such as 2005, 2010, 2020, with respect to their anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by... | |
 | Philippe Sands - 2003 - 1252 pages
...Parties on its First Session, Berlin, 28 March-7 April 1995, FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, para. 2(a). • quantified legally-binding objectives for emission...significant overall reductions within specified timeframes, such as 2005, 2010, 2020, with respect to their anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by... | |
 | Loren R. Cass - 2012 - 282 pages
...created an opening for a compromise. The final conference declaration called for the negotiation of "quantified legally-binding objectives for emission...and significant overall reductions within specified time frames, such as 2005, 2010, 2020, with respect to their anthropogenic emissions by sources and... | |
| |
I nations favored, and which resisted or expressed skepticism about, inclusion of the words "legally-binding" in the phrase "quantified legally-binding objectives for emission limitations and significant overall reductions within specified timeframes"? 