Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, Volume 19West Publishing Company, 1911 Vols. 1-2 contain cases before the Supreme Court of the Territory of Idaho. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 87
Page 11
... presented for determination is : Did the statute of limitations run in favor of respondents , who had settled upon said lot 10 , under the facts as established by the evidence and under the law ? In other words , did the respondents ...
... presented for determination is : Did the statute of limitations run in favor of respondents , who had settled upon said lot 10 , under the facts as established by the evidence and under the law ? In other words , did the respondents ...
Page 47
... presented is : Was the evidence given on be- half of the plaintiffs relevant and competent to support an implied liability against Moore , the defendant ? It is contended by counsel for respondent that respondent cannot be held ...
... presented is : Was the evidence given on be- half of the plaintiffs relevant and competent to support an implied liability against Moore , the defendant ? It is contended by counsel for respondent that respondent cannot be held ...
Page 48
... presented whether there is an implied liability on the part of the defendant to pay to the appellant his proportional part of the cost of the assessment work as well as his proportional part of the cost and expense of pro- curing the ...
... presented whether there is an implied liability on the part of the defendant to pay to the appellant his proportional part of the cost of the assessment work as well as his proportional part of the cost and expense of pro- curing the ...
Page 99
... presented by ap- pellant to the effect that the note sued on was merely a pledge in the hands of the Effingham bank , and that the title to the same never passed to the bank and that the bank was unable to pass title to the respondent ...
... presented by ap- pellant to the effect that the note sued on was merely a pledge in the hands of the Effingham bank , and that the title to the same never passed to the bank and that the bank was unable to pass title to the respondent ...
Page 146
... presented to the United States supreme court was whether the right to inspect was in violation of any of the provisions of the constitution and that court held that it was not . ( 152 U. S. 160 , 14 Sup . Ct . 506 , 38 L. ed . 398 ...
... presented to the United States supreme court was whether the right to inspect was in violation of any of the provisions of the constitution and that court held that it was not . ( 152 U. S. 160 , 14 Sup . Ct . 506 , 38 L. ed . 398 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Ada County affiant affidavit Ailshie alleged application Argument for Appellant Argument for Respondent assessment attorney authority Bank Boise Boise City Boise river canal Canyon County cause of action certificate Codes Coeur d'Alene commissioners complaint constitution construction contended contract corporation counsel Court-Ailshie Court-Budge Court-Stewart Court-Sullivan damages defendant denied district court District Judge ditches entitled evidence fact filed granted held Idaho interest irrigation irrigation district issue judgment Judicial District jury Kootenai county land Latah county legislature Lewiston ment mining claim motion Nez Perce county Northern Pacific Railway notice Opinion option law owner party patent person plaintiff Points Decided Potlatch prior proceedings provisions of sec purchase purpose question railroad reason record Regents road Shoshone county sold specifications statute stream sufficient Syllabus tax deed thereof timber tion trial court verdict Wrble
Popular passages
Page 731 - Anything which is injurious to health, or is indecent, or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property...
Page 110 - The court shall, in every stage of an action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which shall not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party, and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.
Page 597 - The verdict of a jury is either general or special. A general verdict Is that by which they pronounce generally upon all or any of the issues, either in favor of the plaintiff or defendant: a special verdict is that by which the jury find the facts only, leaving the judgment to the court.
Page 233 - And the use of all of these terms, 'treaty', 'agreement', 'compact', show that it was the intention of the framers of the Constitution to...
Page 407 - Where the variance Is not material, as provided in the last section, the Court may direct the fact to be found according to the evidence, or may order an immediate amendment, without costs.
Page 88 - Michigan, filed their petition for a removal of the cause to the Circuit Court of the United States for the proper district.
Page 212 - The right to divert the unappropriated waters of any natural stream to beneficial uses shall never be denied. Priority of appropriation shall give the better right as between those using the water for the same purpose...
Page 157 - No assessment or act relating to assessment or collection of taxes is illegal on account of informality nor because the same was not completed within the time required by law.
Page 23 - That it is complete and regular upon its face. (2) That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact. (3) That he took it in good faith and for value. (4) That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 90 - ... 5. The entry of said default and judgment against these defendants amounts to the taking of their property without due process of law and in violation of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States.