Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, Volume 19West Publishing Company, 1911 Vols. 1-2 contain cases before the Supreme Court of the Territory of Idaho. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 4
... favor of an adverse claim . 7. In an action in ejectment to recover land in this state , the de- fendant may admit title in the United States either with or without claim on his part of the right to procure title from the United States ...
... favor of an adverse claim . 7. In an action in ejectment to recover land in this state , the de- fendant may admit title in the United States either with or without claim on his part of the right to procure title from the United States ...
Page 6
... favor of the respondents and against the appel- lant . ( St. P. M. & M. Co. v . Olson , 87 Minn . 117 , 94 Am . St. 693 , 91 N. W. 294 ; Delacey v . Commercial Trust Co. , 51 Wash . 542 , 130 Am . St. 1112 , 99 Pac . 575 ; Blumer v ...
... favor of the respondents and against the appel- lant . ( St. P. M. & M. Co. v . Olson , 87 Minn . 117 , 94 Am . St. 693 , 91 N. W. 294 ; Delacey v . Commercial Trust Co. , 51 Wash . 542 , 130 Am . St. 1112 , 99 Pac . 575 ; Blumer v ...
Page 10
... favor of the defendants Pyle . It found that the Northern Pacific Railroad Co. became the owner of said lot under the provisions of said act of Congress granting lands to Opinion of the Court - Sullivan , C. J. aid 10 NORTHERN PACIFIC ...
... favor of the defendants Pyle . It found that the Northern Pacific Railroad Co. became the owner of said lot under the provisions of said act of Congress granting lands to Opinion of the Court - Sullivan , C. J. aid 10 NORTHERN PACIFIC ...
Page 11
... favor of defendants , E. E. Pyle and Aletha J. Pyle , decreeing that they were entitled to the payment of said $ 9,200 thereto- fore awarded to them by said commissioners , and that the - claim of the said " Northern Pacific Railway Co ...
... favor of defendants , E. E. Pyle and Aletha J. Pyle , decreeing that they were entitled to the payment of said $ 9,200 thereto- fore awarded to them by said commissioners , and that the - claim of the said " Northern Pacific Railway Co ...
Page 14
... favor of one who occupied the premises by adverse posses- sion under color of title . This was distinctly decided in the Toltec Ranch Company case , wherein it was held that the statute of limitations would run against the railroad ...
... favor of one who occupied the premises by adverse posses- sion under color of title . This was distinctly decided in the Toltec Ranch Company case , wherein it was held that the statute of limitations would run against the railroad ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Ada County affiant affidavit Ailshie alleged application Argument for Appellant Argument for Respondent assessment attorney authority Bank Boise Boise City Boise river canal Canyon County cause of action certificate Codes Coeur d'Alene commissioners complaint constitution construction contended contract corporation counsel Court-Ailshie Court-Budge Court-Stewart Court-Sullivan damages defendant denied district court District Judge ditches entitled evidence fact filed granted held Idaho interest irrigation irrigation district issue judgment Judicial District jury Kootenai county land Latah county legislature Lewiston ment mining claim motion Nez Perce county Northern Pacific Railway notice Opinion option law owner party patent person plaintiff Points Decided Potlatch prior proceedings provisions of sec purchase purpose question railroad reason record Regents road Shoshone county sold specifications statute stream sufficient Syllabus tax deed thereof timber tion trial court verdict Wrble
Popular passages
Page 731 - Anything which is injurious to health, or is indecent, or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property...
Page 110 - The court shall, in every stage of an action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which shall not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party, and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.
Page 597 - The verdict of a jury is either general or special. A general verdict Is that by which they pronounce generally upon all or any of the issues, either in favor of the plaintiff or defendant: a special verdict is that by which the jury find the facts only, leaving the judgment to the court.
Page 233 - And the use of all of these terms, 'treaty', 'agreement', 'compact', show that it was the intention of the framers of the Constitution to...
Page 407 - Where the variance Is not material, as provided in the last section, the Court may direct the fact to be found according to the evidence, or may order an immediate amendment, without costs.
Page 88 - Michigan, filed their petition for a removal of the cause to the Circuit Court of the United States for the proper district.
Page 212 - The right to divert the unappropriated waters of any natural stream to beneficial uses shall never be denied. Priority of appropriation shall give the better right as between those using the water for the same purpose...
Page 157 - No assessment or act relating to assessment or collection of taxes is illegal on account of informality nor because the same was not completed within the time required by law.
Page 23 - That it is complete and regular upon its face. (2) That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact. (3) That he took it in good faith and for value. (4) That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 90 - ... 5. The entry of said default and judgment against these defendants amounts to the taking of their property without due process of law and in violation of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States.