THE Pittsburgh Legal Journal VOLUME 102 1954 COMPRISING ALL THE ADVANCE REPORTS Published by PITTSBURGH LEGAL JOURNAL 434-436 Boulevard of Allies Pittsburgh 19, Pa. Telephone, ATlantic 1-6556 Law Library Press of SMITH BROS. CO. INC. Printers and Publishers 434-436 Boulevard of Allies Pittsburgh 19, Pa. ESTABLISHED 1853 Pittsburgh Legal Journal INCORPORATED APRIL 9, 1909 Second Oldest Law Journal in the United States and Third Oldest in the World P4pit V102. LAW WEEKLY EDITION PUBLISHED EVERY SATURDAY VOLUME 102 Containing Reports from Pennsylvania Judicial Districts and ROSS M. BLAIR, President and Managing Editor WEEKLY EDITION Weekly Edition of the Pittsburgh Legal Journal including bound volume at end of calendar year-$14.00. Payable in advance. Subscriptions can be entered any time, but the bound volume is not included unless subscription is received for the first number of the current volume. Single copy 15¢. The bound volume alone sells for $10.00, postpaid. The weekly parts, not including the bound volume, are priced at $4.00 per year. DAILY EDITION The Daily Edition of the Pittsburgh Legal Journal is designated by the Courts of Allegheny County and the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania as the legal newspaper for the publication of all notices required by law or rules of Court. The Daily Edition of the Pittsburgh Legal Journal, issued 5 days each week, $20 per annum, payable in advance. Single copy 10¢. No bound volume of the Daily Edition is issued. Address All Communications to PITTSBURGH LEGAL JOURNAL 434-436 Boulevard of Allies Pittsburgh 19, Pa. INDEX TO CASES (For subjects, refer to Index to Subjects, following Page 496) Title of Case Aberman, Associated Lumber and Mfg. Co. v... Ackerman, Wotherspoon v.............. Page 412 250 American Tel. and Tel. Co., Sisters of Mercy v.. 378 Appeal from Ordinance No. 120 of Fox Chapel Boro........... 169 Bavuso v Pittsburgh & West Virginia Rwy. 390 281 Bires, Adm. v Pittsburgh Railways Co................................ 227 Brown et al., Country Club Development Co. v.. 67 City of McKeesport, White Oak Boro. Authority v.. 223 |