Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE 1-WASTES Excluded From Non-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued

Facility

Address

Waste description

Monroe Auto

Paragould, AR.. Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplat

[blocks in formation]

ing operations after vacuum filtration after November 27, 1985. This exclusion does not apply to the sludge contained in the on-site impoundment.

Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations. This exclusion was published on April 20, 1989.

[blocks in formation]

Reynolds

Sheffield, AL....

Metals

Company

Siegel-Robert,

St. Louis, MO...

Inc Square D Company. Syntex

Springfield,

Agribusiness.

MO.

Dewatered Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after October 17, 1986.

Filter press sludge generated (at a maximum annual rate of 96 cubic yards) during the treatment of electroplating wastewaters using lime (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006). This exclusion was published on October 26, 1990.

Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after August 15, 1986.

Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after August 15, 1986.

Wastewater treatment filter press sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated (at a maximum annual rate of 3,840 cubic yards) from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum. This exclusion was published on July 17, 1990.

Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after November 27, 1985.

Oxford, Ohio..... Dewatered filter press sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after August 15, 1986.

Kiln ash, cyclone ash, separator sludge, and filtered wastewater (except spent activiated carbon) (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F020 generated during the treatment of wastewater treatment sludge by the EPA's Mobile Incineration System at the Denney Farm Site in McDowell, Missouri after June 2, 1988, so long as:

(1) The incinerator is monitored continuously and is in compliance with operating permit
conditions. Should the incinerator fail to comply with the permit conditions relevant to the
mechanical operation of the incinerator, Syntex must test the residues generated during
the run when the failure occurred according to the requirements of Conditions (2) through
(6), regardless of whether or not the demonstration in Condition (7) has been made.
(2) Four grab samples of wastewater must be composited from the volume of filtered
wastewater collected after each eight hour run and, prior to disposal the composite
samples must be analyzed for the EP toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide. If arsenic,
chromium, lead, and silver EP leachate test results exceed 0.61 ppm; barium levels
exceed 12 ppm; cadmium and selenium levels exceed 0.12 ppm; mercury levels exceed
0.02 ppm; nickel levels exceed 6.1 ppm; or cyanide levels exceed 2.4 ppm, the
wastewater must be retreated to achieve these levels or must be disposed in accordance
with all applicable hazardous waste regulations. Analyses must be performed according to
SW-846 methodologies.

(3) One grab sample must be taken from each drum of kiln and cyclone ash generated
during each eight hour run; all grabs collected during a given eight hour run must then be
composited to form one composite sample. A composite sample of four grab samples of
the separator sludge must be collected at the end of each eight hour run. Prior to the
disposal of the residues from each eight hour run, an EP leachate test must be performed
on these composite samples and the leachate analyzed for the EP toxic metals, nickel,
and cyanide (using a distilled water extraction for the cyanide extraction) to demonstrate
that the following maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations listed below are
not exceeded. Analyses must be performed according to SW-846 methodologies. Any
residues which exceed any of the levels listed below must be retreated to achieve these
levels or must be disposed in accordance with all applicable hazardous waste regulations.
Maximum Allowable Solids Treatment Residue EP Leachate Concentrations (mg/L)
Arsenic-1.6

Barium-32

Cadmium-0.32

Chromium-1.6

Lead-1.6

Mercury-0.065

Nickel-16

Selenium-0.32

Silver-1.6

Cyanide-6.5

Facility

TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC Sources-Continued

[blocks in formation]

(4)--If Syntex stabilizes any of the kiln and cyclone ash or separator sludge, a Portland
cement-type stabilization process must be used and Syntex must collect a composite
sample of four grab samples from each batch of stabilized waste. An MEP leachate test
must be performed on these composite samples and the leachate analyzed for the EP
toxic metals, nickel, and cyanide (using a distilled water extraction for the cyanide leachate
analysis) to demonstrate that the maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations
listed in Condition (3) are not exceeded during any run of the MEP extraction. Analyses
must be performed according to SW-846 methodologies. Any residues which exceed any
of the levels listed in Condition (3) must be retreated to achieve these levels or must be
disposed in accordance with all applicable hazardous waste regulations. (If the residues
are stabilized, the analyses required in this condition supercede the analyses required in
Condition (3).)

(5) Syntex must generate, prior to disposal of residues, verification data from each eight hour
run from each treatment residue (ie., kiln and cyclone ash, separator sludge, and filtered
wastewater) to demonstrate that the maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations
listed below are not exceeded. Samples must be collected as specified in Conditions (2)
and (3). Analyses must be performed according to SW-846 methodologies. Any solid or
liquid residues which exceed any of the levels listed below must be retreated to achieve
these levels or must be disposed in accordance with Subtitle C of RCRA.
Maximum Allowable Wastewater Concentrations (ppm):

Benz(a)anthracene-1× 10-4
Benzo(a)pyrene-4x10-5

Benzo(b)fluoranthene-2× 10-4

Chloroform-0.07

Chrysene-0.002

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene-9×10-6

1,2-Dichloroethane-0.06

Dichloromethane-0.06

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene-0.002

Polychlorinated biphenyls-1x10-4

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene-0.13

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol-12

Toluene-120

Trichloroethylene-0.04

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol-49

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol-0.02

Maximum Allowable Solid Treatment Residue Concentrations (ppm):

Benz(a)anthracene-1.1

Benzo(a)pyrene-0.43

Benzo(b)fluoranthene-1.8

Chloroform-5.4

Chrysene-170

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene-0.083

Dichloromethane--2.4

1,2-Dichloroethane-4.1

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene-330

Polychlorinated biphenyls-0.31

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene-720
Trichloroethylene-6.6

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol-3.9

200

(6) Syntex must generate, prior to disposal of residues, verification data from each eight hour run for each treatment residue (ie., kiln and cyclone ash, separator sludge, and filtered wastewater) to demonstrate that the residues do not contain tetra-, penta-, or hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins or furans at levels of regulatory concern. Samples must be collected as specified in Conditions (2) and (3). The TCDD equivalent levels for wastewaters must be less than 2 ppq and less than 5 ppt for the solid treatment residues. Any residues with detected dioxins or furans in excess of these levels must be retreated or must be disposed as acutely hazardous. Method 8290, a high resolution gas chromatography and tetra- and pentachloronated dioxin and furan homologs, the maximum practical quantitation used. For limit must not exceed 15 ppt for solids and 120 ppq for wastewaters. For hexachlorinated

300 ppq for wastewaters.

and

(7)(A) The test data from Conditions (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) must be kept on file by Syntex for inspection purposes and must be compiled, summarized, and submitted to the Washington, D.C. 20460 by certified mail on a monthly basis and when the treatment of the lagoon sludge is concluded. All data submitted will be placed in the RCRA docket.

ontinued

Facility

[blocks in formation]

Tennessee.
Tennessee
Electroplat-
ing.

Tennessee Electroplating.

Texas
Instruments,

Inc.

Tricil

Environmen

tal Systems,

Inc.

Pt. 261, App. IX

TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued

Address

Ripley, TN..

Ripley,

Tennessee.

Ripley, TN.

Dallas, TX

Waste description

(B) The testing requirements for Conditions (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6) will continue until Syntex provides the Section Chief, Variances Section, with the results of four consecutive batch analyses for the petitioned wastes, none of which exceed the maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations listed in these conditions and the Section Chief, Variances Section, notifies Syntex that the conditions have been lifted.

(8) Syntex must provide a signed copy of the following certification statement when submitting data in response to the conditions listed above: "Under civil and criminal penalty of law for the making or submission of false or fraudulent statements or representations, I certify that the information contained in or accompanying this document is true, accurate, and complete. As to the (those) identified section(s) of this document for which I cannot personally verify its (their) accuracy. I certify as the company official having supervisory responsibility for the persons who, acting under my direct instructions, made the verification that this information is true, accurate and complete." Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from the copper, nickel, and chromium electroplating of plastic parts after November 17, 1986. Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F006) generated from electroplating operations after November 17, 1986. To ensure chromium levels do not exceed the regulatory standards there must be continuous batch testing of the filter press sludge for chromium for 45 days after the exclusion is granted. Each batch of treatment residue must be representatively sampled and tested using the EP toxicity test for chromium. This data must be kept on file at the facility for inspection purposes. If the extract levels exceed 0.922 ppm of chromium the waste must be managed and disposed of as hazardous. If these conditions are not met, the exclusion does not apply. This exclusion does not apply to sludges in any on-site impoundments as of this date. Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations and contained in an on-site surface impoundment (maximum volume of 6,300 cubic yards). This is a one-time exclusion. This exclusion was published on April 8, 1991.

Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F006 and F019) generated after August 27, 1985, from their electroplating operations that have been batch tested for cadmium using the EP toxicity procedure and have been found to contain less than 0.30 ppm cadmium in the EP extract. Wastewater treatment sludges that exceed this level will be considered a hazardous waste.

Hilliard, Ohio..... Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after November 17, 1986. To ensure that hazardous constituents are not present in the waste at levels of regulatory concern, the facility must implement a contingency testing program for the petitioned wastes. This testing program must meet the following conditions for the exclusion to be valid:

(1) Each batch of treatment residue must be representatively sampled and tested using the
total oil and grease test and the EP Toxicity test (or the Oily Waste EP test, if the oil and
grease content of the waste exceeds one percent) for arsenic, barium, cadmium,
chromium, lead, selenium, silver, mercury, and nickel. If the extract concentrations for
chromium, lead, arsenic, and silver exceed 0.315 ppm; barium levels exceed 6.3 ppm;
cadmium and selenium levels exceed 0.063 ppm; mercury levels exceed 0.013 ppm; or
nickel levels exceed 2.2 ppm, the waste will be re-treated or managed and disposed as a
hazardous waste under 40 CFR Parts 262 to 265 and the permitting standards of 40 CFR
Part 270.

(2) Each batch of treatment residue must be tested for reactive and leachable cyanide. If the
reactive cyanide levels exceed 250 ppm or leachable cyanide levels (using the EP Toxicity
test without acetic acid adjustment) exceed 1.26 ppm, the waste must be re-treated or
managed and disposed as a hazardous waste under 40 CFR Parts 262 to 265 and the
permitting standards of 40 CFR Part 270.

(3) Each batch of the waste must be tested for the total content of the following organic
toxicants. If the total content of any of the constituents exceeds the maximum levels
shown, the waste must be managed and disposed as a hazardous waste under 40 CFR
Parts 262 to 265 and the permitting standards of 40 CFR Part 270.

Compound and Maximum Acceptable Levels (ppm)

Acrolein-56.8

Anthracene-76.8

Benzene-0.106

p-Chloro-m-cresol-133

1,1-Dichloroethane-0.01

Fluorene-10.4

Methylene chloride-8.2

Methyl ethyl ketone-326

n-Nitrosodiphenylamine-11.9

Phenanthrene-14

Tetrachloroethylene-0.188

Trichloroethylene-0.59

Chloroform-0.013

109

Facility

TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued

[blocks in formation]

(B) Subsequent testing: Representative grab samples of each drum of kiln
and cyclone ash generated from each week of operation must be
composited to form one composite sample of ash for each weekly
period. Representative grab samples of each drum of calcium chloride
salts generated from each week of operation must also be composited
to form one composite sample of calcium chloride salts for each weekly
period.
Prior to disposal of the residues from each weekly sampling period, the
weekly composites must be analyzed for all of the constituents listed in
Condition (3). The analytical data, including quality control information,
must be compiled and maintained on site for a minimum of three years.
These data must be furnished upon request and made available for
inspection by any employee or representative of EPA.

(2) Waste holding: The incineration residues that are generated must be stored as
hazardous until the initial verification analyses or subsequent analyses are
completed.

If the composite incineration residue samples (from either Condition (1)(A) or
Condition (1)(B)) do not exceed any of the delisting levels set in Condition (3), the
incineration residues corresponding to these samples may be managed and
disposed of in accordance with all applicable solid waste regulations.

If any composite incineration residue sample exceeds any of the delisting levels set
in Condition (3), the incineration residues generated during the time period
corresponding to this sample must be retreated until they meet these levels
(analyses must be repeated) or managed and disposed of in accordance with
subtitle C of RCRA. Incineration residues which are generated but for which
analysis is not complete or valid must be managed and disposed of in
accordance with subtitle C of RCRA, until valid analyses demonstrate that the
wastes meet the delisting levels.

(3) Delisting levels: If concentrations in one or more of the incineration residues for
any of the hazardous constituents listed below exceed their respective maximum
allowable concentrations also listed below, the batch of failing waste must either
be re-treated until it meets these levels or managed and disposed of in

accordance with subtitle C of RCRA.

TA

(A) Inorganics (Leachable): Arsenic, 0.32 ppm; Barium, 6.3 ppm; Cadmium,
0.06 ppm; Chromium, 0.32 ppm; Cyanide, 4.4 ppm; Lead, 0.32 ppm;
Mercury, 0.01 ppm; Nickel, 4.4 ppm; Selenium, 0.06 ppm; Silver, 0.32
ppm. Metal concentrations must be measured in the waste leachate as
per 40 CFR 261.24. Cyanide extractions must be conducted using
distilled water.

(B) Organics: Benzene, 0.87 ppm; Benzo(a)anthracene, 0.10 ppm;
Benzo(a)pyrene, 0.04 ppm; Benzo (b)fluoranthene, 0.16 ppm; Chloroben-
zene, 152 ppm; o-Chlorophenol, 44 ppm; Chrysene, 15 ppm; 2, 4-D, 107
ppm; DDE, 1.0 ppm; Dibenz(a,h)anthracene, 0.007 ppm; 1, 4-Dichloro-
benzene, 265 ppm; 1, 1-Dichloroethylene, 1.3 ppm; trans-1,2-Dichloroeth-
ylene, 37 ppm; Dichloromethane, 0.23 ppm; 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 43 ppm;
Hexachlorobenzene, 0.26 ppm; Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene, 30 ppm; Poly-
chlorinated biphenyls, 12 ppm; 2,4,5-T, 1 x 10 ppm; 1,2,4,5-Tetrach-
lorobenzene, 56 ppm; Tetrachloroethylene, 3.4 ppm; Trichloroethylene,
1.1 ppm; 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 21,000 ppm; 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, 0.35

ppm.

(C) Chlorinated dioxins and furans: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
equivalents, 4 X 10-7 ppm.
The petitioned by-product must be analyzed for the tetra-, penta-, hexa-,
and heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins, and the tetra-, penta-, hexa-, and
heptachlorodibenzofurans to determine the 2, 3, 7, 8-tetra- chlorodi
benzo-p-dioxin equivalent concentration. The analysis must be conducted
using Method 8290, a high resolution gas chromatography/high resolu-
tion mass spectrometry method, and must achieve practical quantitation
limits of 15 parts per trillion (ppt) for the tetra- and penta- homologs, and
37 ppt for the hexa- and hepta- homologs.

(4) Termination of testing: Due to the possible variability of the incinerator feeds,
the testing requirements of Condition (1)(B) will continue indefinitely.

[merged small][ocr errors]

Pt. 261, App. IX

TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued

Facility

Address

Waste description

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

BBC Brown

Boveri, Inc.
Boeing

Commercial
Airplane Co.
Bommer

Industries
Inc.
Capitol

Products

Corp.
Capitol
Products
Corporation.

Chamberlian

Featherlite,

Inc.

Cincinnati
Metropolitan

Sewer
District.
Clay

Equipment

Corporation.

[blocks in formation]

(5) Data submittals: Within one week of system start-up, ADPC&E must notify the Section Chief, Variances Section (see address below) when the full-scale incineration system is on-line and waste treatment has begun. The data obtained through Condition (1)(A) must be submitted to the Section Chief, Variances Section, PSPD/OSW (OS-343), U.S. EPA, 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460, within the time period specified. At the Section Chief's request, ADPC&E must submit analytical data obtained through Condition (1)(B) within the time period specified by the Section Chief. Failure to submit the required data obtained from Condition (1)(A) within the specified time period or to maintain the required records for the time specified in Condition (1)(B) (or to submit data within the time specified by the Section Chief) will be considered by the Agency, at its discretion, sufficient basis to revoke ADPC&E's exclusion to the extent directed by EPA. All data must be accompanied by the following certification statement:

"Under civil and criminal penalty of law for the making or submission of false or fraudulent statements or representations (pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Federal Code, which include, but may not be limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 42 U.S.C. 6928), I certify that the information contained in or accompanying this document is true, accurate and complete. As to the (those) identified section(s) of this document for which I cannot personally verify its (their) truth and accuracy, I certify as the company official having supervisory responsibility for the persons who, acting under my direct instructions, made the verification that this information is true, accurate and complete. In the event that any of this information is determined by EPA in its sole discretion to be false, inaccurate or incomplete, and upon conveyance of this fact to the company, I recognize and agree that this exclusion of wastes will be void as if it never had effect or to the extent directed by EPA and that the company will be liable for any actions taken in contravention of the company's RCRA and CERCLA obligations premised upon the company's reliance on the void exclusion."

Sanford, FL... Dewatered Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after October 17, 1986.

Auburn,

Washington.

Landrum, SC....

Residually contaminated soils in an inactive sludge pile containment area on March 27, 1990, previously used to store wastewater treatment sludges generated from electroplating operations (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006).

Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from their electroplating operations and contained in evaporation ponds #1 and #2 on August 12, 1987.

Harrisburg, PA.. Dewatered wastewater treatment slugdges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. FO19) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after September 12, 1986.

Kentland, IN.....

Hot Springs,
AR.

Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after November 17, 1986.

Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after July 16, 1986.

Cincinnati, OH.. Sluiced bottom ash (approximately 25,000 cubic yards) contained in the South Lagoon, on September 13, 1985 which contains EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F001, F002, F003, F004, and F005.

Cedar Falls, lowa.

Tulsa, OK..

Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) and spent
cyanide bath solutions (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F009) generated from electroplating
operations and disposed of in an on-site surface impoundment. This is a onetime
exclusion. This exclusion was published on August 1, 1989.

Olympia, WA.... Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (DPA Hazardous Waste No. FO19) generated from
the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after September 12, 1986.
Dewatered wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. FO06) generated from
their electroplating operations after April 29, 1986.

Clinton,

Indiana.

Incinerator scrubber liquids, entering and contained in their onsite surface impoundment, and solids settling from these liquids originating from the burning of spent solvents (EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F002, F003, and F005) contained in their onsite surface impoundment and solids retention area on August 18, 1988 and any new incinerator scubber liquids and settled solids generated in the surface impoundment and and disposed of in the retention are after August 12, 1988.

101

« PreviousContinue »