TABLE 1-WASTES Excluded From Non-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued Facility Address Waste description Monroe Auto Paragould, AR.. Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplat ing operations after vacuum filtration after November 27, 1985. This exclusion does not apply to the sludge contained in the on-site impoundment. Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations. This exclusion was published on April 20, 1989. Reynolds Sheffield, AL.... Metals Company Siegel-Robert, St. Louis, MO... Inc Square D Company. Syntex Springfield, Agribusiness. MO. Dewatered Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after October 17, 1986. Filter press sludge generated (at a maximum annual rate of 96 cubic yards) during the treatment of electroplating wastewaters using lime (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006). This exclusion was published on October 26, 1990. Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after August 15, 1986. Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after August 15, 1986. Wastewater treatment filter press sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated (at a maximum annual rate of 3,840 cubic yards) from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum. This exclusion was published on July 17, 1990. Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after November 27, 1985. Oxford, Ohio..... Dewatered filter press sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after August 15, 1986. Kiln ash, cyclone ash, separator sludge, and filtered wastewater (except spent activiated carbon) (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F020 generated during the treatment of wastewater treatment sludge by the EPA's Mobile Incineration System at the Denney Farm Site in McDowell, Missouri after June 2, 1988, so long as: (1) The incinerator is monitored continuously and is in compliance with operating permit (3) One grab sample must be taken from each drum of kiln and cyclone ash generated Barium-32 Cadmium-0.32 Chromium-1.6 Lead-1.6 Mercury-0.065 Nickel-16 Selenium-0.32 Silver-1.6 Cyanide-6.5 Facility TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC Sources-Continued (4)--If Syntex stabilizes any of the kiln and cyclone ash or separator sludge, a Portland (5) Syntex must generate, prior to disposal of residues, verification data from each eight hour Benz(a)anthracene-1× 10-4 Benzo(b)fluoranthene-2× 10-4 Chloroform-0.07 Chrysene-0.002 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene-9×10-6 1,2-Dichloroethane-0.06 Dichloromethane-0.06 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene-0.002 Polychlorinated biphenyls-1x10-4 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene-0.13 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol-12 Toluene-120 Trichloroethylene-0.04 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol-49 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol-0.02 Maximum Allowable Solid Treatment Residue Concentrations (ppm): Benz(a)anthracene-1.1 Benzo(a)pyrene-0.43 Benzo(b)fluoranthene-1.8 Chloroform-5.4 Chrysene-170 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene-0.083 Dichloromethane--2.4 1,2-Dichloroethane-4.1 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene-330 Polychlorinated biphenyls-0.31 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene-720 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol-3.9 200 (6) Syntex must generate, prior to disposal of residues, verification data from each eight hour run for each treatment residue (ie., kiln and cyclone ash, separator sludge, and filtered wastewater) to demonstrate that the residues do not contain tetra-, penta-, or hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins or furans at levels of regulatory concern. Samples must be collected as specified in Conditions (2) and (3). The TCDD equivalent levels for wastewaters must be less than 2 ppq and less than 5 ppt for the solid treatment residues. Any residues with detected dioxins or furans in excess of these levels must be retreated or must be disposed as acutely hazardous. Method 8290, a high resolution gas chromatography and tetra- and pentachloronated dioxin and furan homologs, the maximum practical quantitation used. For limit must not exceed 15 ppt for solids and 120 ppq for wastewaters. For hexachlorinated 300 ppq for wastewaters. and (7)(A) The test data from Conditions (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) must be kept on file by Syntex for inspection purposes and must be compiled, summarized, and submitted to the Washington, D.C. 20460 by certified mail on a monthly basis and when the treatment of the lagoon sludge is concluded. All data submitted will be placed in the RCRA docket. ontinued Facility Tennessee. Tennessee Electroplating. Texas Inc. Tricil Environmen tal Systems, Inc. Pt. 261, App. IX TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued Address Ripley, TN.. Ripley, Tennessee. Ripley, TN. Dallas, TX Waste description (B) The testing requirements for Conditions (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6) will continue until Syntex provides the Section Chief, Variances Section, with the results of four consecutive batch analyses for the petitioned wastes, none of which exceed the maximum allowable treatment residue concentrations listed in these conditions and the Section Chief, Variances Section, notifies Syntex that the conditions have been lifted. (8) Syntex must provide a signed copy of the following certification statement when submitting data in response to the conditions listed above: "Under civil and criminal penalty of law for the making or submission of false or fraudulent statements or representations, I certify that the information contained in or accompanying this document is true, accurate, and complete. As to the (those) identified section(s) of this document for which I cannot personally verify its (their) accuracy. I certify as the company official having supervisory responsibility for the persons who, acting under my direct instructions, made the verification that this information is true, accurate and complete." Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from the copper, nickel, and chromium electroplating of plastic parts after November 17, 1986. Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F006) generated from electroplating operations after November 17, 1986. To ensure chromium levels do not exceed the regulatory standards there must be continuous batch testing of the filter press sludge for chromium for 45 days after the exclusion is granted. Each batch of treatment residue must be representatively sampled and tested using the EP toxicity test for chromium. This data must be kept on file at the facility for inspection purposes. If the extract levels exceed 0.922 ppm of chromium the waste must be managed and disposed of as hazardous. If these conditions are not met, the exclusion does not apply. This exclusion does not apply to sludges in any on-site impoundments as of this date. Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations and contained in an on-site surface impoundment (maximum volume of 6,300 cubic yards). This is a one-time exclusion. This exclusion was published on April 8, 1991. Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F006 and F019) generated after August 27, 1985, from their electroplating operations that have been batch tested for cadmium using the EP toxicity procedure and have been found to contain less than 0.30 ppm cadmium in the EP extract. Wastewater treatment sludges that exceed this level will be considered a hazardous waste. Hilliard, Ohio..... Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after November 17, 1986. To ensure that hazardous constituents are not present in the waste at levels of regulatory concern, the facility must implement a contingency testing program for the petitioned wastes. This testing program must meet the following conditions for the exclusion to be valid: (1) Each batch of treatment residue must be representatively sampled and tested using the (2) Each batch of treatment residue must be tested for reactive and leachable cyanide. If the (3) Each batch of the waste must be tested for the total content of the following organic Compound and Maximum Acceptable Levels (ppm) Acrolein-56.8 Anthracene-76.8 Benzene-0.106 p-Chloro-m-cresol-133 1,1-Dichloroethane-0.01 Fluorene-10.4 Methylene chloride-8.2 Methyl ethyl ketone-326 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine-11.9 Phenanthrene-14 Tetrachloroethylene-0.188 Trichloroethylene-0.59 Chloroform-0.013 109 Facility TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued (B) Subsequent testing: Representative grab samples of each drum of kiln (2) Waste holding: The incineration residues that are generated must be stored as If the composite incineration residue samples (from either Condition (1)(A) or If any composite incineration residue sample exceeds any of the delisting levels set (3) Delisting levels: If concentrations in one or more of the incineration residues for accordance with subtitle C of RCRA. TA (A) Inorganics (Leachable): Arsenic, 0.32 ppm; Barium, 6.3 ppm; Cadmium, (B) Organics: Benzene, 0.87 ppm; Benzo(a)anthracene, 0.10 ppm; ppm. (C) Chlorinated dioxins and furans: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (4) Termination of testing: Due to the possible variability of the incinerator feeds, Pt. 261, App. IX TABLE 1-WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES-Continued Facility Address Waste description BBC Brown Boveri, Inc. Commercial Industries Products Corp. Chamberlian Featherlite, Inc. Cincinnati Sewer Equipment Corporation. (5) Data submittals: Within one week of system start-up, ADPC&E must notify the Section Chief, Variances Section (see address below) when the full-scale incineration system is on-line and waste treatment has begun. The data obtained through Condition (1)(A) must be submitted to the Section Chief, Variances Section, PSPD/OSW (OS-343), U.S. EPA, 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460, within the time period specified. At the Section Chief's request, ADPC&E must submit analytical data obtained through Condition (1)(B) within the time period specified by the Section Chief. Failure to submit the required data obtained from Condition (1)(A) within the specified time period or to maintain the required records for the time specified in Condition (1)(B) (or to submit data within the time specified by the Section Chief) will be considered by the Agency, at its discretion, sufficient basis to revoke ADPC&E's exclusion to the extent directed by EPA. All data must be accompanied by the following certification statement: "Under civil and criminal penalty of law for the making or submission of false or fraudulent statements or representations (pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Federal Code, which include, but may not be limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 42 U.S.C. 6928), I certify that the information contained in or accompanying this document is true, accurate and complete. As to the (those) identified section(s) of this document for which I cannot personally verify its (their) truth and accuracy, I certify as the company official having supervisory responsibility for the persons who, acting under my direct instructions, made the verification that this information is true, accurate and complete. In the event that any of this information is determined by EPA in its sole discretion to be false, inaccurate or incomplete, and upon conveyance of this fact to the company, I recognize and agree that this exclusion of wastes will be void as if it never had effect or to the extent directed by EPA and that the company will be liable for any actions taken in contravention of the company's RCRA and CERCLA obligations premised upon the company's reliance on the void exclusion." Sanford, FL... Dewatered Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from electroplating operations after October 17, 1986. Auburn, Washington. Landrum, SC.... Residually contaminated soils in an inactive sludge pile containment area on March 27, 1990, previously used to store wastewater treatment sludges generated from electroplating operations (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006). Wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) generated from their electroplating operations and contained in evaporation ponds #1 and #2 on August 12, 1987. Harrisburg, PA.. Dewatered wastewater treatment slugdges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. FO19) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after September 12, 1986. Kentland, IN..... Hot Springs, Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after November 17, 1986. Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F019) generated from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum after July 16, 1986. Cincinnati, OH.. Sluiced bottom ash (approximately 25,000 cubic yards) contained in the South Lagoon, on September 13, 1985 which contains EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F001, F002, F003, F004, and F005. Cedar Falls, lowa. Tulsa, OK.. Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (EPA Hazardous Waste No. F006) and spent Olympia, WA.... Dewatered wastewater treatment sludges (DPA Hazardous Waste No. FO19) generated from Clinton, Indiana. Incinerator scrubber liquids, entering and contained in their onsite surface impoundment, and solids settling from these liquids originating from the burning of spent solvents (EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F002, F003, and F005) contained in their onsite surface impoundment and solids retention area on August 18, 1988 and any new incinerator scubber liquids and settled solids generated in the surface impoundment and and disposed of in the retention are after August 12, 1988. 101 |