Page images
PDF
EPUB

January 1989

LABCOM FOCUS

ETDL's SBIR programs pay off

By Richard Stern

and Carol Widmaier

(Editor's note. The Electronics Technology and Devices Laboratory (ETDL), Fort Monmouth, NJ.. entered the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) arena five years ago with a budget/program of $100.000; today, it boasts a highly successful SBIR program consisting of more than two dozen contracts with a budget in excess of $3 million. The laboratory's first two SBIR programs have now fully completed the SBIR cycle and are already impacting DoD and NASA radar and communications systems for both ground and space applications.)

Tec Technology recently developed under one of ETDL's completed programs is beginning to impact the Army communications satellite effort. This contractual effort was funded through SBIR Phase I and Phase II contracts

Shown observing the demonstration of the new power combiner developed under a highly successful ETDL SBIR program with the Steinbrecher Corp. are left to right)

for the past two-and-a-half years and will provide a significant increase in reliability of communication systems when operating under adverse battlefield conditions such as rain, smoke. fog, or snow by increasing the power available from extremely high fre quency (EHF/millimeter-wave) power amplifiers.

Wavelengths in the EHF region are measured in millimeters compared. for example. to the VHF and UHF commercial TV operating regions where wavelengths are measured in meters. The shorter wavelengths at EHF allow substantial reduction in size and weight of electronic components. antennas and associated radar and communication systems for both military and commercial applications.

This effort resulted in an efficient IMPATT-diode power amplifier combiner for communications applications. The SBIR contractor. Steinbrecher, Inc., has demonstrated technology suntable for a key class of Military Stationary Relay (MILSTAR)

Dr. Lothar Wandlinger of ETDL; Scott Sharp, the SCOTT Terminal project manager; and Dr. Donald Steinbrecher and Dr. Dean Peterson of the Steinbrecher Corp.

Page 7

High performance millimeter wave switches use new and improved ferrite materials developed by Electromagnetic Sciences, Inc., under an ETDL SBIR program. This effort has now been transitioned into a cooperative R&D agreement under the Technology Transfer Act of 1986.

communications terminals. The technology has increased four times the available output signal power. This solid-state power generation is available in a functional, fieldable form for application in MILSTAR but will have application in other military systems such as millimeter-wave transmitters in smart munitions and imaging radar systems. Measurement, assembly and test procedures have been developed for use with this technology which can be automated and which offer low-cost and reliable solutions for the fielding and maintenance of the millimeter wave power-generating equipment.

Results of this successful SBIR effort have been presented to the Army Single Channel Objective Tactical Terminal (SCOTT) program manager and Magnavox, the prime contractor for the SCOTT ground terminals. SCOTT is the Army version of the MILSTAR program. Magnavox has initiated a program for a producibility demonstra

tion of the millimeter-wave transmitter, with Steinbrecher receiving a contract under this program A Phase III follow-on effort is planned to provide equipment to the federal gov ernment utilizing the technology developed under the SBIR Phase II program by Steinbrecher.

The Steinbrecher Corporation is a small, high-tech business located in Woburn, Mass. The company has extensive experience in the design and manufacturer of high-power millimeter wave components and systems and employs 40 people.

ETDL recently transitioned the technology developed under a second highly successful SBIR program into a technology transfer program via a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRDA) as allowed under the Technology Transfer Act of 1986. This SBIR effort resulted in an improved class of ceramic magnetic materials (ferrites, much like "refrigerator" magnets) for millimeter wave devices (ie. high frequency switches) which utilize these materials for performing circuit functions such as signal switching and electronic antenna scanning in radar and communications systems This development is already impacting numerous DoD and NASA radar and communications systems

Participants in the follow-on CRDA are ETDL and Electromagnetic Sciences, Inc. the SBIR contractor The CRDA C the test ind es hation

of these millimeter wave femte matenals and associated devices under high power operation and is now being car ried out in ETDL's high power millimeter-wave test and evaluation facility located in the newly completed Pulse Power Center.

This effort will aid in the development of devices capable of withstanding the power requirements in new radar and satellite communications systems for future military commercial applications Electromagnetic Sciences operated as a small business employing less than 300 people through the initial stages of the SBIR effort, but has since grown to its present capacity of more than 700 people.

ETDL has a number of SBIR programs in progress that will result in new and highly successful technological developments. One such effort is developing a prototype scanning tunneling microscope (STM) with stateof-the-art capabilities for imaging the atomic structure of semiconductor materials and electronic device structures that yield very precise high resolution. This STM would replace more complex and expensive scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) used in quality assurance, manufacturing line testing and inspection and will result in increased semiconductor reliability for military as well as commercial electronic systems.

This Phase II contract is scheduled to be completed at the end of FY89 with commercial versions of the STM unit available in FY90. The significance of this program is that this effort would give the U.S. a decided edge over the Japanese in the development and application of the newly emerging STMs.

Dick Stern. ETDL's SBIR and technology transfer manager, attributes the success of ETDL's SBIR program to several factors First, the SBIR program is decentralized to the laboratory level allowing project selection by

ETDL technical staff. Second, SBIR topics along with Phase I and Phase II proposals are prioritized and carefully screened through several levels of the laboratory chain of command such that a high level of success is insured. A simplified solicitation procedure along with ETDL's prompt execution of SBIR contracts encourages greater participation by small businesses resulting in highly competitive and innovative

[graphic]
[merged small][graphic]

Army Electronics Technology and Devices Laboratory (ETDL), LABCOM, Ft. Monmouth, NJ, and is responsible for the Laboratory's technology transfer and Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) programs. His previous professional experience has primarily been in research and development activities concerned with mm-wave transmission lines, antennas and control devices at ETDL. Stern is a member of the IEEE and has authored and co-authored numerous technical papers on ferrite devices, dielectric waveguides and inertialess scanning antennas and holds more than 30 patents. He is also a member of Eta Kappa Nu.

Mr. WALGREN. Thank you very much. We appreciate that testimony and we'll come back for a little discussion in a minute. We probably should have put Dr. Brewen on directly after Dr. Princen, since both of you come from northern Illinois, but welcome, Dr. Brewen. We appreciate your being here. Please proceed.

Dr. BREWEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate this opportunity to appear before you and your committee and to discuss the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 and particularly the impact it has had and the opportunities it has presented for the formation of a consortium I'm going to describe this morning.

The Biotechnology Research and Development Corporation, which I will refer to hereafter as BRDC, if you don't mind the use of the acronym, is a consortium of seven prominent U.S. corporations with major research and business interests in the biotechnology arena. These companies, very briefly, are the American Cyanamid Company, Amoco Technology Corporation, the Dow Chemical Corporation, ECOGEN Inc., the Hewlett-Packard Company, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation and the Agricultural Research and Development Corporation.

BRDC represents a unique first-of-its-kind organization in the sense that it is the first time that the Federal and a State Government and the private sector have entered into a cooperative research and development endeavor that is mutually funded in terms of supporting dollars for funding of research.

This endeavor was made possible only by the passage of the Federal Technology Transfer Act. This legislation provided the necessary legal direction to finalize a four-year effort to form BRDC. It allows Federal laboratories and the private sector to enter into cooperative research agreements and encourages commercialization through-and I emphasize the word "exclusive"-licensing arrangements for the technologies generated under these agreements. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of Commerce view BRDC as a model program combining the scientific research talents of Federal and State university laboratories with private sector development capabilities.

The BRDC member companies who have both competitive and diverse market interests, join forces in this consortium because they are convinced they can achieve substantial gain by leveraging the research investment in very basic and exploratory research projects.

To address the broad issues of the member companies, BRDC will support basic research that offers flexibility for broad application. In other words, research directed at discovering and inventing new advanced biotechnology production methods and other opportunities. I think the best way to represent what we are engaged in is to read to you our formal mission statement for research.

"BRDC," and I quote now, "is a consortium dedicated to, one, improving the United States technical competitiveness by capitalizing on scientific discoveries made in the Agricultural Research Service Laboratories and universities in the State of Illinois; two, enhancing the competitive and productive research center in the participating ARS laboratories and universities; three, providing the basis for interactive dialogue between the participating research organizations and member companies; four, providing the technology base

for shareholder companies to improve their opportunities to manufacture and introduce new biotechnology-related products into the marketplace; and five, assisting in the transfer of this technology base to the member companies.

"The highly diverse nature of the markets addressed by the shareholder companies indicates that the research be generic and basic in order to provide the flexibility for broad application.

"BRDC will initially focus its research activities on developing advanced biotechnology methodology. The emphasis will be placed on discovering-and? developing core technologies in four areas, which are enumerated as, one, new and more efficient transformation and expression systems in both lower and higher organisms, with an emphasis placed on agronomically important plants; two biosensors, three biocatalysis; and four methodologies for developing separations of fermentation products.

"BRDC will actively seek research that is on the cutting edge of the areas of interest and identify brand new and promising ideas to fund. BRDC will do this by encouraging researchers to submit their ideas in all areas of biotechnology. These submissions will be judged on their creativity and perceived opportunity for providing 'breakthrough' concepts. For example, areas of interest to us in the near future are delivery technology and the elucidation of the mechanisms of ligand and cell receptor recognition and binding.

"BRDC will endeavor to identify and support innovative research projects throughout the ARS laboratory network in accordance with the ARS/BRDC Master Research and Development Agreement. As BRDC involves ARS laboratories in other States, it will actively encourage those States and their State institutions to emulate the State of Illinois and become active participants in the program.'

[ocr errors]

Now, the question may be asked, where do we receive our funds? BRDC has been committed $20 million of funding over the next five years. These funds come from the USDA, through the Agricultural Research Service, the State of Illinois and annual contributions from our member companies.

It is our intent to support research principally at the University of Illinois and other public universities in the State of Illinois and at the Northern Regional Research Center in Peoria, Illinois. But we will involve other Agricultural Research Service laboratories and public and private universities in the State of Illinois.

As of this time, we have entered into research and development agreements with two Federal agencies and two public universities in the Illinois State system. These are very broad research agreements. The Federal agencies are the Agricultural Research Service and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST. The two universities are the University of Illinois, Champaign/ Urbana and Northern Illinois University in De Kalb, Illinois. We are currently negotiating a broad research and development agreement with Southern Illinois University and we have entered into preliminary discussions with Northwestern University and with the Argonne National Laboratory, which is part of the Department of Energy National Laboratory system.

At this moment, we are either actively funding or committed to fund beginning July 1 of this calendar year, 29 research projects,

totaling nearly $3.5 million per year. All of these projects fall within the four broad areas of interest previously identified and involve each of the above-mentioned institutions with the exception of Northwestern University.

We are funding research not only at the Northern Regional Research Center, but also at the Western Regional Research Center and at the Eastern Regional Research Center.

These research projects are selected by a Scientific Advisory Board, which is composed of representatives from each of our member companies, the Agricultural Research Service and the University of Illinois.

The Scientific Advisory Board judges proposals primarily on technical merit and member company interests, emphasizing innovativeness and the potential as breakthrough concepts. In fact, we have established what I refer to as a seed money fund, which is unique. This fund is to support feasibility studies that would not normally be supported by most Federal granting agencies, because the concept is to support-novel new ideas that require preliminary data for the demonstration of proof of concept. People do not have to come to us with existing data saying, it will work. We say, give us your ideas; we'll support a year's worth of research and if they work, then we'll enter into a major agreement.

It is my personal opinion that the Federal Technology Transfer Act has opened the door to substantially stronger Federal laboratory, academic and private sector cooperation and collaboration. This opinion is based on our experience in our first year of operation. We have found that many of the "pseudo barriers" of intellectual discourse and technical exchange between these three distinct scientific cultural groups have been eliminated by the mere fact that it is now possible for them to work together as a team, striving for a common goal.

Many of our industrial scientists see this as an opportunity to involve themselves in the high-risk basic research that they would not undertake in their own organization; while the academic and Federal scientists now have the opportunity to involve themselves in the commercial development of their basic research successes. We do this by putting work teams, work groups together on a semiannual basis where all scientists discuss their research results, even though they are all under separate agreements.

With that, I conclude my comments and thank you. [The prepared statement of Dr. Brewen follows:]

« PreviousContinue »