Page images
PDF
EPUB

It further appearing that the provisions of the chapter have been complied with; that the arrangement is for the best interests of the creditors of said debtor; that the arrangement is fair and equitable, and feasible; that the debtor has not been guilty of any of the acts or failed to perform any of the duties which would be a bar to the discharge of a bankrupt; and that the proposal and its acceptance are in good faith and have not been made or procured by any means, promises, or acts forbidden by the Act.

It is ordered that the arrangement be, and it hereby is, confirmed.

Referee in Bankruptcy.

FORM No. 55

APPLICATION FOR CONFIRMATION OF AN ARRANGEMENT UNDER CHAPTER XII

Το

......

Referee in Bankruptcy:

the above-named debtor, respectfully represents that the arrangement under chapter XII of the Bankruptcy Act, proposed in the petition filed by him on the ........ day of ... 19..., has been duly accepted, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, and that the deposit required by the provisions of the chapter and by the arrangement, amounting to the sum of dollars, has been deposited, subject to the order of the court, in of . . . . . . . ., the depository designated by the court. Wherefore the debtor prays that the arrangement be confirmed by the court.

.....

........

[blocks in formation]

To the Honorable ...

District Court of the United States for the

Judge of the

[blocks in formation]

1. Your petitioner has resided [or has had his domicile] at within the above judicial district, for the six months immediately preceding the filing of this petition [or for a longer portion of the six months immediately preceding the filing of this petition than in any other judicial district].

2. Your petitioner is an individual whose principal income is derived from wages, salary or commissions.

3. No bankruptcy proceeding, initiated by a petition by or against your petitioner, is now pending.

4. Your petitioner is insolvent [or unable to pay his debts as they mature], and desires to effect a composition [or an extension of time to pay his debts, or a composition and an extension of time to pay his debts] out of his future earnings.

5. The schedule hereto annexed, marked Schedule A, and verified by your petitioner's oath, contains a full and true statement of all his debts, and, so far as it is possible to ascertain, the names and places of residence or of business of his creditors, and such further statements concerning said debts as are required by the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act.

6. The schedule hereto annexed, marked Schedule B, and verified by your petitioner's oath, contains an accurate inventory of all his property, real and personal, and such further statements concerning said property as are required by the provisions of the Act.

7. The statement hereto annexed, marked Exhibit 1, and verified by your petitioner's oath, contains a full and true statement of all his executory contracts, as required by the provisions of the Act.

8. The statement hereto annexed, marked Exhibit 2, and verified by your petitioner's oath, contains a full and true statement of his affairs, as required by the provisions of the Act.

Wherefore your petitioner prays that proceedings may be had upon this petition in accordance with the provisions of chapter XIII of the Bankruptcy Act.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

I,

SS.

the petitioner named in the foregoing petition, do hereby make solemn oath that the statements contained therein are true according to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

[blocks in formation]

[Schedules to be annexed corresponding with schedules under Form

No. 1.]

FORM No. 60

APPLICATION FOR CONFIRMATION OF AN ARRANGEMENT UNDER CHAPTER XIII

Το

Referee in Bankruptcy:

the above-named debtor, respectfully represents that the plan under chapter XIII of the Bankruptcy Act, submitted by him at a meeting of his creditors on the ........ day of ....... 19..., has been duly accepted, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, and that he has made the deposit of moneys required by the provisions of the chapter [If it be the fact, add: and that the deposit required by the provisions of the plan, amounting to the sum of ........ dollars, has been deposited, subject to the order of the court, in the depository designated by the

court].

[ocr errors]

of ...

[ocr errors]

Wherefore the debtor prays that the plan be confirmed by the

[blocks in formation]

FORM No. 67

NOTICE OF FIRST MEETING OF CREDITORS IN PROCEEDINGS

UNDER SECTION 75

(Abrogated)

FORM No. 68

APPLICATION FOR CONFIRMATION OF A COMPOSITION OR EXTENSION
PROPOSAL UNDER SECTION 75

(Abrogated)

FORM NO. 69

ORDER CONFIRMING A COMPOSITION OR EXTENSION PROPOSAL

UNDER SECTION 75

(Abrogated)

INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. See Antitrust Acts, 3; Fed-
eral Power Commission; Labor; Transportation, 1-3.

ADMIRALTY.

1. Amendments of rules, p. 1019.

2. Suits in Admiralty Act-Seaworthiness-Vessel not in naviga-
tion.-Existence of warranty of seaworthiness depends on whether
vessel is in navigation; finding that deactivated, "mothballed," gov-
ernment-owned ship being used solely for storage of grain was not in
navigation sustained as not clearly erroneous; Government not liable
to employee of stevedoring company injured while unloading grain
from ship at pier. Roper v. United States, p. 20.

AFFIDAVITS. See Communism; Constitutional Law, I, 8.

AFFILIATION. See Communism.

AGRICULTURE. See Constitutional Law, III, 1–2.

ALABAMA. See Constitutional Law, I, 2.

ALLOCUTION. See Procedure, 3.

AMENDMENTS OF RULES.

1. Admiralty Rules, p. 1019.

2. Bankruptcy Rules and Forms, p. 1043.

3. Civil Procedure, p. 1009.

4. Supreme Court, p. 803.

ANTITRUST ACTS. See also Constitutional Law, I, 1.

1. Clayton Act-Sherman Act-Suit for treble damages-Summary
judgment. In suit for treble damages for alleged violations of Sher-
man Act, record presented genuine issues as to material facts, and it
was error to grant summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure, 56 (c). Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, p. 464.

2. Clayton Act-Allowance to buyer in lieu of brokerage-Scope of
cease-and-desist order.-After this Court had sustained Federal Trade
Commission finding that broker had violated § 2 (c) of Clayton Act
by reducing its commissions on sales by only one seller to only one
buyer, Court of Appeals should have affirmed cease-and-desist order
without deleting references to other sellers and other buyers. Federal
Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co., p. 360.

« PreviousContinue »