Clement C. Wood, Chief Deputy Attorney General of Delaware, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MCLAIN v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 129, Misc. Decided October 9, 1961. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 55 Cal. 2d 78, 357 P. 2d 1080. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. 368 U.S. October 16, 1961. GREMILLION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 200. Decided October 16, 1961. 194 F. Supp. 182, affirmed. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, Carroll Buck, First Assistant Attorney General, and M. E. Culligan and George M. Ponder, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. RILEY v. PENNSYLVANIA READING SEASHORE LINES. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 427, Misc. Decided October 16, 1961. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Appellant pro se. Thomas Raeburn White, Jr. for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC., v. MONAGHAN, COMMISSIONER OF HARNESS RACING. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 299. Decided October 16, 1961. Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Samuel I. Rosenman, George Morton Levy and Max Freund for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction. 368 U.S. Per Curiam. CASTLE v. UNITED STATES. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 60, Misc. Decided October 16, 1961. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded for resentencing, since petitioner was guilty of but a single offense under 18 U. S. C. § 2314. Reported below: 287 F. 2d 657. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. We are in agreement with the representations of the Solicitor General that, under the principles announced in Bell v. United States, 349 U. S. 81, the petitioner was guilty of but a single offense under 18 U. S. C. § 2314. In light of such representations and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to remit to the District Court for resentencing in accordance with this opinion. Per Curiam. 368 U.S. GOODMAN v. UNITED STATES ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 281, Misc. Decided October 16, 1961. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Kenneth Carroad, Theodore Propp and Edwin L. Wolf for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for the United States et al. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court to permit the United States to file an appropriate motion in that court to withdraw its prior application for an order directing petitioner to testify. |