Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NINETY-NINTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

ON

H.R. 2617, H.R. 2839, and H.R. 3511

BANK BRIBERY

JULY 11 AND 17, 1985

Serial No. 104

Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary

59-087 O

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON: 1987

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, DC 20402

JACK BROOKS, Texas

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

PETER W. RODINO, JR., New Jersey, Chairman

ROBERT W. KASTENMEIER, Wisconsin
DON EDWARDS, California
JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan
JOHN F. SEIBERLING, Ohio
ROMANO L. MAZZOLI, Kentucky
WILLIAM J. HUGHES, New Jersey
MIKE SYNAR, Oklahoma
PATRICIA SCHROEDER, Colorado
DAN GLICKMAN, Kansas

BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts
GEO. W. CROCKETT, JR., Michigan
CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York
BRUCE A. MORRISON, Connecticut
EDWARD F. FEIGHAN, Ohio
LAWRENCE J. SMITH, Florida
HOWARD L. BERMAN, California
RICK BOUCHER, Virginia

HARLEY O. STAGGERS, JR., West Virginia
JOHN BRYANT, Texas

HAMILTON FISH, JR., New York
CARLOS J. MOORHEAD, California
HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois
THOMAS N. KINDNESS, Ohio
DAN LUNGREN, California

F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR.,
Wisconsin

BILL MCCOLLUM, Florida
E. CLAY SHAW, JR., Florida
GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania
MICHAEL DEWINE, Ohio

WILLIAM E. DANNEMEYER, California
HANK BROWN, Colorado

PATRICK L. SWINDALL, Georgia
HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

Toensing, Victoria, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division,
U.S. Department of Justice, accompanied by Stephen Learned
Prepared statement

99, 125

42, 47

2, 18
103, 132

Chafetz, Marc E., letter to Mr. Michael Ward, assistant counsel, Subcommit-
tee on Criminal Justice, August 2, 1985...

Dennis, Warren L. and Chafetz, Marc E., "The New Bribery Act: A Trap for
the Unwary," 4 The Banking Law Journal 316....
Jones, Douglas H., Deputy General Counsel, Federal Deposit Insurance Corpo-
ration letter to Representative John Conyers, Jr., August 13, 1985.
Withers, Arlen L., Director of Congressional Relations, Federal Home Loan
Bank Board, letter to Representative John Conyers, Jr., August 16, 1985.......

Сваты Евха

BANK BRIBERY

THURSDAY, JULY 11, 1985

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY,

Washington, DC.

The subcommittee met at 10:15 a.m., in room 2237, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Rick Boucher presiding.

Present: Representatives Boucher, Bryant, and Gekas.

Staff present: Thomas W. Hutchison, counsel; Michael E. Ward, assistant counsel; Raymond Smietanka, associate counsel; and Bennie B. Williams, clerk.

Mr. BOUCHER. The subcommittee will come to order. Representative Conyers is unable to be here at this time and has asked that I chair the hearing in his absence.

Today we are initiating hearings on H.R. 2839 and H.R. 2617, bills to amend section 215 of title 18, United States Code, which prohibits bank bribery.

Approximately 1 year ago, on July 30, 1984, the House of Representatives, after suspending the rules, passed the Financial Bribery and Fraud Amendments Act of 1984 to revise and expand Federal criminal laws prohibiting bribery and fraud in banking operations. That bill was drafted by this subcommittee as an alternative to a little noticed provision in the Comprehensive Crime Control Act which had previously been adopted in the Senate. The bank bribery provisions of the crime package had never been the subject of hearings in the Senate and had not been brought to the attention of the affected business community.

After evaluating the Senate provisions, this subcommittee concluded that the Senate version was drafted so broadly as to make everyday business activities criminal conduct. The Senate proposal prohibited giving or receiving anything of value in connection with any transaction of a covered financial institution. Thus, allowing a client to pay for lunch or accepting an honor from a grateful charitable organization, for example, would fall within the literal prohibitions of the new section. That Federal prosecutors may be unlikely ever to prosecute such a violation is of little consolation since members of the industry would still be left, and are left today, in a quandary about when acceptably illegal conduct becomes unacceptable. The legislation prepared by this subcommittee is intended to remedy that problem.

Unfortunately there was never an opportunity to resolve the differences between the two approaches. During the rush to bring Congress to a close the Comprehensive Crime Control Act in its

(1)

« PreviousContinue »