Page images
PDF
EPUB

For most of the youngsters growing up in poverty, their working years were still in the future and their present security depended primarily on the earnings or other income available to their parents. For 6.1 million of the children counted poor, the status reflected the fact that 12 million men and one-half million women who were employed full time the year around did not earn enough to support their children. (An additional 400,000 families of fully employed breadwinners with no children were in poverty also.) If the low-income index rather than the poverty criterion is used as a gauge, about 101⁄2 million children in 3 million families must be counted as poor or near poor despite the year-round employment of the working head.

Half the workers whose family was poor even though they were not unemployed during the year were laborers, service workers or farmers, compared with only 1 in 7 of the fully employed workers heading nonpoor families. On the other hand, only 8 percent of the year-round employed but poor family heads had professional, technical, or clerical jobs, jobs generally requiring some higher education. Twenty-nine percent of the year-round workers at the head of nonpoor families held such jobs.

The direct bearing of education on job potential and consequently on the risk of poverty reinforces the need for ensuring that young people carry their schooling at least to high school graduation. Many youngsters in poor families now don't do so. The resultant low earning capacity is then aggravated by the fact that school leavers tend to marry early, thus further increasing the odds that they will bring up their own children in poverty.10

Included in the households of the poor in 1964 were 3 million persons aged 16-21. Half were still in school and nearly one-sixth, no longer in school, had a high school diploma. But more than a third were not in school and were not high school graduates; this group included half the young men who had already taken on the role of a family head. In nonpoor households by contrast only

1 in 7 of the nearly 15 million persons aged 16-21 was neither in school nor a high school graduate (table 9):

10 See Alvin L. Schorr, "Family Cycle and Income Development," Social Security Bulletin, February 1966.

TABLE 9.—Current school attendance of persons aged 16 to 21 in poor and nonpoor households: Percentage distribution by sex and family relationship, March 1965

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

1 Households are defined here as total of families and unrelated individuals. households are defined as family or unrelated individual with income in 1964 below the SSA poverty index.

Poor

2 Includes head of subfamily.

3 Includes wife of subfamily head.

4 Includes own children of the family head and all never-married relatives aged 16 to 21. Excludes small number of ever-married relatives aged 16 to 21 living neither as spouse nor parent of any other family member.

5 Not shown for base less than 100,000.

Data for 1963 showed relatively few teenagers in poor families, suggesting that such families may not hold their youngsters as long as families who are better off. The data for 1964 reenforce the implication. They do indicate, however, a less pronounced relationship between school attendance and family relationship for nonwhite youngsters than for white; Nonwhite boys appear to marry later than white boys regardless of schooling and nonwhite girls are more likely than white girls at an early age to find themselves serving as head of a family. These patterns are undoubtedly related to the proverty proneness of the nonwhite population and the limited earnings opportunity for the men.

That low educational attainment went hand in hand with poverty was true regardless of family status, but yougsters already out on their own were more often poor than those who had not yet left home. Shown below are the poverty rates for persons aged 16-21 in each family status group-that is, the percentage who were in a household with 1964 income below the poverty line.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed]

1 Income of family or unrelated individuals below 8SA poverty index.

Whether it is that they are no longer in school that impels toward marriage or whether it is the desire to marry that interrupts the schooling, it is clear that youngsters who leave school before the twelfth grade take on family responsibility earlier than those who, go to high school and stay on to graduate. Among boys aged 18-19 who have left school without a high school diploma, 1 in 5 is already the head of a family group; of the high school graduates in this age group who are no longer in school, 1 in 9 is a family head ; but of the 18- and 19-year-old boys still in school, only 1 percent has taken on family responsibility (table 10) :

[graphic]

TABLE 10.-Family status and school attendance of persons aged 16 to 21-Percentage distribution by sex, age, and race, March 1965

Family head.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[graphic]

Subfamily head.

Wife of family head.

Wife of other family member.

Never-married child 1

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Family head.

[ocr errors]

Subfamily head.

Wife of family head.

Wife of other family member.

Never-married child 1.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Maludas own children of family head and other never-married relatives aged 18 21.

2 Not shown for base less than 100,000.

« PreviousContinue »