...Administrator's determination on Jth'e procedural point is "arbitrary or capricious" section 307 (d) (5)(c)). The second is whether the procedural errors "were...significantly changed if such errors had not been made section 307(d) (8)). Only if the reviewing court can make affirmative findings as to each of these questions...

...so serious and related to matters of such central relevance to the rule that there is a substantinl likelihood that the rule would have been significantly changed if such errors had not been made section 307(d)(8)). Only if the reviewing court can make affirmative findings as to each of these questions...

...Congress said in reviewing alleged procedural errors: The court may invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such...significantly changed if such errors had not been made. This was provided in the 1977 amendments to the Clean Air Act. In my prepared testimony, I developed...

...determinations. In reviewing alleged procedural errors, the court may invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such...significantly changed if such errors had not been made. (9) In the case of review of any action of the Administrator to which this subsection applies, the...

...Congress said in reviewing alleged procedural errors : The court may invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such...significantly changed if such errors had not been made. This was provided in the 1977 amendments to the Clean Air Act. In my prepared testimony, I developed...

...determinations. In reviewing alleged procedural errors, the court may invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such...significantly changed if such errors had not been made. (9) In the case of review of any action of the Administrator to which this subsection applies, the...

...which provides: In reviewing alleged procedural errors, the court r.ay invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such...significantly changed if such errors had not been made. There are some differences in wording but as I see it the basic intent is the sane. I support this...

...determinations. In reviewing alleged procedural errors, the court may invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such...significantly changed if such errors had not been made. (9) In the case of review of any action of the Administrator to which this subsection applies, the...

...determinations. In reviewing alleged procedural errors, the court may invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such...significantly changed if such errors had not been made. (9) In the case of review of any action of the Administrator to which this subsection applies, the...

...Club. 667 F.2d at 391-98. The Clean Air Act, for instance, instructs reversal of EPA action only if procedural "errors were so serious and related to...significantly changed if such errors had not been made." 42 USC I 7607(d)(8). Furthermore, the Act appears to exclude from the record for judicial nview many...