Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

ALBERT THOMAS, Texas 1
MICHAEL J. KIRWAN, Ohio
JAMIE L. WHITTEN, Mississippi
GEORGE W. ANDREWS, Alabama
JOHN J. ROONEY, New York
JOHN E. FOGARTY, Rhode Island
ROBERT L. F. SIKES, Florida
OTTO E. PASSMAN, Louisiana
JOE L. EVINS, Tennessee
EDWARD P. BOLAND, Massachusetts
WILLIAM H. NATCHER, Kentucky
DANIEL J. FLOOD, Pennsylvania
WINFIELD K. DENTON, Indiana
TOM STEED, Oklahoma
GEORGE E. SHIPLEY, Illinois
JOHN M. SLACK, JR., West Virginia
JOHN J. FLYNT, JR., Georgia
NEAL SMITH, Iowa

ROBERT N. GIAIMO, Connecticut

JULIA BUTLER HANSEN, Washington
CHARLES S. JOELSON, New Jersey
JOSEPH P. ADDABBO, New York
JOHN J. MCFALL, California
W. R. HULL, JR., Missouri

D. R. (BILLY) MATTHEWS, Florida
JEFFERY COHELAN, California
THOMAS G. MORRIS, New Mexico
EDWARD J. PATTEN, New Jersey
CLARENCE D. LONG, Maryland
JOHN O. MARSH, JR., Virginia
ROBERT B. DUNCAN, Oregon
SIDNEY R. YATES, Illinois
BILLIE S. FARNUM, Michigan
BOB CASEY, Texas 2

FRANK T. BOW, Ohio

CHARLES R. JONAS, North Carolina
MELVIN R. LAIRD, Wisconsin
ELFORD A. CEDERBERG, Michigan
GLENARD P. LIPSCOMB, California
JOHN J. RHODES, Arizona
WILLIAM E. MINSHALL, Ohio
ROBERT H. MICHEL, Illinois
SILVIO O. CONTE, Massachusetts
ODIN LANGEN, Minnesota

BEN REIFEL, South Dakota
GLENN R. DAVIS, Wisconsin
HOWARD W. ROBISON, New York
GARNER E. SHRIVER, Kansas
JOSEPH M. McDADE, Pennsylvania
MARK ANDREWS, North Dakota

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR AND HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1967

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 1966.

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

WITNESSES

DR. JAMES A. SHANNON, DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

DR. STUART M, SESSOMS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

DR. G. BURROUGHS MIDER, DIRECTOR OF LABORATORIES AND CLINICS, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

DR. JOHN F. SHERMAN, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR FOR EXTRAMURAL PROGRAMS, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

RICHARD L. SEGGEL, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

CHARLES MILLER, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OFFICER, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

JOSEPH S. MURTAUGH, CHIEF, OFFICE OF PROGRAM PLANNING, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

DR. WILLIAM H. STEWART, SURGEON GENERAL

HARRY L. DORAN, CHIEF FINANCE OFFICER

JAMES B. CARDWELL, DEPARTMENT DEPUTY COMPTROLLER

Mr. FOGARTY. We have before us this morning the National Institutes of Health.

GENERAL STATEMENT OF THE DIRECTOR

Dr. Shannon, do you have a statement for the committee?

Dr. SHANNON. Yes, Mr. Chairman. I have a statement of some 13 pages which I can read or insert, at your pleasure.

Mr. FOGARTY. Whatever you want to do.

Dr. SHANNON. Then I shall read it. It is not too long.

Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, it is once again my pleasant duty to report to you on the progress of the NIH programs and to testify to the needs of these programs for the next fiscal year. As always, I welcome this opportunity to appear before you.

In my opening statement last year I discussed, in some detail, the directions in which biomedical research seems to be moving and the role which Federal support programs-and the NIH programs in particular-might most usefully play in the years immediately ahead. I described the growing importance to the understanding of disease—

Of comprehensive studies of human development;

Of research in molecular biology, especially into the mechanic of genetics;

Of a thorough exploration of environmental and behaviora factors in the cause of disease:

And of the application of the techniques and tools of the phys ical sciences and mathematics to the solution of biological prol lems. These are long-term trends in medical research. What I said abou them last year is equally true today-perhaps just a little more so.

As my views on the goals and future directions of the NIH program are already on the record, I shall confine myself to a brief account o the present state of the NIH programs and to a summary of the 19€ budget request. I shall, of course, be glad to discuss in more deta any points which members of the committee may wish to raise.

Each of the Institute directors will report to you on the specif accomplishments in the various categorical areas. To illustrate th heartening progress made during the past year all along the frontie of the war against disease, I should like to mention a few examples c research achievements and of promising new projects.

RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS

As prevention is the only feasible "cure" for many serious congenit: anomalies and diseases, it is particularly important to develop bette techniques for predicting under what conditions these defects are likel to occur. One such new technique is a blood test for identifying wome who may be carriers of a gene causing progressive muscular dystroph This form of the disease, which accounts for two-thirds of all cases muscular dystrophy, is inherited-half of the male children born women who carry the gene will have the disease even though th mother shows no sign of it. The new blood test will identify 75 pe cent of such women. If the test is widely adopted-and, more impo tantly, if affected women heed its results-a large number of the tragic cases could be prevented.

The new blood test for carriers of progressive muscular dystrophy only one of a steadily growing array of tests and procedures for d tecting genetic defects that may be passed on by a parent to a chil There are now a score of inheritable errors in metabolism which ca be identified in apparently healthy adults who are unwitting ca riers. These include galactosemia; various blood abnormalities, suc as certain types of anemias; a form of rickets that resists treatment wit vitamin D; abnormal drug sensitivities; and, of course, the disease no widely known as PKU. Many of the abnormalities for which prenat tests are already available are fairly rare but this is no consolation the family that is stricken by one of them.

PREMARITAL COUNSELING BY MEDICAL PROFESSION

These developments are beginning to make it possible for the medcal profession to offer a kind of premarital counseling that could ultimately result in a sharp reduction in the incidence of a number of congenital abnormalities including some which result in severe-and tragic-mental retardation.

The medical profession has a moral obligation to warn prospective parents of the disabilities they may pass on to their children when this is known or readily determinable. The time has come when this responsibility must be taken seriously. Advances in medical research are making it possible for medical practitioners to save the lives of many children with a transmissible birth defect who, a decade or so ago, would have died before reaching child-bearing age. The effect-if I may put it bluntly, Mr. Chairman-is that we are gradually weakening our genetic inheritance. By our humanitarian interference with the operation of natural selection we are saving many lives but we are also to some extent degrading the health of the Nation. Genetic counseling is thus becoming not merely a moral obligation of the medical profession but a serious social responsibility as well.

The prevention of the congenital abnormalities for which premarital or preconception tests are available is, of course, only possible if the affected couples do not have children. This is certainly not always a very happy solution.

It would be a much better solution if we could remedy such genetic defects. This is, as yet, but a distant hope. However, fundamental research in genetics is making progress on the problem of identifying which part of a gene is responsible for passing on certain characteristics to an offspring and a beginning is being made on techniques for altering genetic traits. This very new field sometimes called "genetic engineering," presents a possible avenue toward the prevention of inherited diseases and disease-proneness about which only the most Imaginative scientists dared to dream a few years ago.

I have a listing of a series of these inborn errors of metabolism that are identifiable in healthy carriers which might be interesting to put in the record.

Mr. FOGARTY. Very well.

Dr. SHANNON. They are now reaching a very substantial number. Mr. FOGARTY. Give us the list with an explanation of each one; also how to pronounce them.

(The list referred to follows:)

PRONUNCIATION OF TERMS IN THE ACCOMPANYING SUBMITTAL, ENTITLED "INBOR ERRORS OF METABOLISM IDENTIFIABLE IN HEALTHY CARRIERS IN TRAITS”

albinism (al'bin⚫izm)

cholinesterase (ko ̋lin-es'tur-ace)

chromosome (kro'mo-sohm)

dehydrogenase (dee-high-drah'gen-ase) or (de-high'dro.gen⚫ase)

diabetes (dye"uh bee'teez)

dystrophy (dis'tro-fee)

galactose (ga·lack'toce)

galactosemia (ga∙lack" to see' me uh)

gene (jeen)

gluecose (glōō'koce)

glycogen (glye' koʻjen)

heme (heem)

hemoglobin (hee" mo⚫glo'bin)

hemophilia (hee"mo-fill'ee uh)

histidine (hiss' ti deen)

histidinemia (hiss ti di nee' me uh)

hypophosphatasia (high"po-foss"fuh taze'ee-uh)

insipidus (in sip'i dus)

isoleucine (eye'so lew" seen)

leucine (lew'seen)

mellitus (mel'it⚫us)

methemoglobin (met hee"mo-gloʼbin)

methemoglobinemia (met hee" mo globin ee'mee⚫uh)

phenylalanine (fen"il al'uh-neen)

phenyketonuria (fen"il-kee"ton your'ee.uh)

phosphatase (fos'fuh tace)

pseudocholinesterase (sue"do ko"lin es'tur-ace)

pyruvate kinase (pieʼroo-vate

thalassemia (thal'uh see"me⚫uh)

valine (vay'leen)

[ocr errors]

vasopressin (vay”zo·pressʼin)

kye'nace)

INBORN ERRORS OF METABOLISM IDENTIFIABLE IN HEALTHY CARRIERS OF TRAIT

INTRODUCTION

Healthy carriers of hereditary diseases exist because, in general, the inform tion, which controls the development and the adult function of an individua exists in duplicate within a fertilized egg and without all the cells which d velop from it. In one of his two sets of hereditary units (called genes) th carrier has a gene which directs the production of an abnormal state in th body. The detrimental effect of this errant gene does not become manifest b cause of its normal partner, the products of which are sufficient to carry o relatively normal functions during development and in adult life. A gene who effects can be hidden in this way is called recessive as opposed to a domina gene whose effects are not masked.

The carrier of such an abnormality has a roughly 50-50 chance of contribu ing the normal or the defective gene to each offspring, since each parent normal only transmits one gene of his or her gene pair to the fertilized egg. The tw parental genes are then the pair for the child. (The other genes are discarde in the process of making spermatazoa or eggs; otherwise there would be a co stant piling up of surplus genetic material in succeeding generations.)

If the transmitted gene is an abnormal one and that from the other parent similarly abnormal, the offspring will get defective products from both and wi show the full-blown effects of the disorder. If the gene from the other parent normal, the child too will be a carrier.

One special exception to these rules needs mention. The genes of huma beings, like other animals, are carried on those parts of the human cells calle chromosomes. There are normally 46 chromosomes in each human cell. Of thos 44 exist as 22 different pairs, each pair containing partners which are indisti

« PreviousContinue »