The Federal Antitrust Laws: With Summary of Cases Instituted by the United States, 1890-1951Commerce Clearing House, 1952 - 461 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 67
Page 88
... June 29 , 1911 , in the Circuit Court ( S. D. N. Y. ) against Palmer and thirty - eight others constituting the RUBBER COVERED WIRE Association , charging the operation of a pool to fix prices and to apportion terrritory . The ...
... June 29 , 1911 , in the Circuit Court ( S. D. N. Y. ) against Palmer and thirty - eight others constituting the RUBBER COVERED WIRE Association , charging the operation of a pool to fix prices and to apportion terrritory . The ...
Page 420
... June 29 , 1951 , in the District Court ( S. D. Fla . ) , charging three corporations with attempting to monopolize the sale and distribution of PRINTING SUPPLIES and SERVICES to the rural printing industry of the United States in ...
... June 29 , 1951 , in the District Court ( S. D. Fla . ) , charging three corporations with attempting to monopolize the sale and distribution of PRINTING SUPPLIES and SERVICES to the rural printing industry of the United States in ...
Page 421
... June 29 , 1951 , in the District Court ( S. D. Calif . ) , charging defendant with attempting to monopolize the sale of alumi- num coil slats for VENETIAN BLINDS in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 3 of the ...
... June 29 , 1951 , in the District Court ( S. D. Calif . ) , charging defendant with attempting to monopolize the sale of alumi- num coil slats for VENETIAN BLINDS in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 3 of the ...
Contents
Page | 6 |
RobinsonPatman Act | 23 |
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 | 35 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreements alleges that defendants alleging a combination alleging a conspiracy Ass'n CCH Trade Regulation charges that defendants charging a combination charging a conspiracy Circuit Court Civil Clayton Act combination and conspiracy Company complaint alleges Complaint under Sections consent decree consent judgment conspiracy in restraint conspiracy to restrain Court N. D. Ill Court S. D. Calif dealers December 17 decree was entered defendants pleaded nolo demurrers District Court N. D. District Court S. D. N. Y. enjoining the further February February 14 fines totalling fix prices guilty indictment charges Indictment under Section individual defendants interstate trade January January 12 jobbers June 29 monopolize interstate motion nolle prosequi November October patents perpetually enjoining petition pleaded nolo contendere price fixing prosequi was entered remaining defendants restraint of interstate retail sell Sherman Act filed Sherman Act returned Stat Supp Supreme Court tion trade and commerce Trade Regulation Reports United wholesale