...will not presume that the statute curtails constitutionally protected activity as little as possible. For standards of permissible statutory vagueness are strict in the area of free expression. See Smith v. California, 361 US 147, 151; Winters v. New York, 333 US 507, 509510, 517-518; Herndon...

...understanding; otherwise our civilization will stagnate and die." Opinion of the Court. 385 US 371 US 415, 438; "[f]or standards of permissible statutory vagueness...regulate in the area only with narrow specificity." Id., at 432-433. New York's complicated and intricate scheme plainly violates that standard. When one...

...application of sanctions. Cf. Smith v. California, supra, at 151-154 ; Speiser v. Randall, 357 US 513, 526. Because First Amendment freedoms need breathing space...regulate in the area only with narrow specificity. Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 US 296, 311. (NAACP v. Button, 371 US 415, 433 (1963))." The decisions,...

...Opinion of tho Court, 385 US 371 US 415, 438; "[f]or standards of permissible statutory vagueness arc strict in the area of free expression. . . . Because...regulate in the area only with narrow specificity." Id., nt 432-433. New York's complicated and intricate scheme plainly violates that standard. When one...

...Opinion of tho Court, 385 US 371 US 415, 438; "[f]or standards of permissible statutory vagueness arc strict in the area of free expression. . . . Because...regulate in the area only with narrow specificity." Id., nt -132-433. New York's complicated and intricate scheme plainly violates that standard. When...

...Opinion of tlio Court. 385 US 371 US 415, 438; "[f]or standards of permissible statutory vagueness arc strict in the area of free expression. . . . Because...regulate in the area only with narrow specificity." Id., at 432-433. New York's complicated and intricate scheme plainly violates that standard. When one...

...to the mandate of the Constitution as construed t<y the Supreme Court The Supreme Court has said : ••(S)tandards of permissible statutory vagueness are strict in the area of free Amendment freedoms, the existence of a penal statute susceptible of sweeping and improper application....

...touchstone in an area so clearly touching our most precious freedoms.' NAACP v. Button 371 US 415, 438 ; 'For standards of permissible statutory vagueness are strict in the area of free expression * * * government may regulate in the area only with narrow specificity (Id. 432-33)." The unauthorized...

...Justice Brennan recalled the words of an earlier decision when he wrote: 218 219 371 US 415, 43M : 'For standards of permissible statutory vagueness are strict in the area of free expression * * * government may regulate in the area only with narrow specilicity (Id. 432-33)." The unauthorized...

...to the mandate of the Constitution as construed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has said : [S]tandards of permissible statutory vagueness are strict in the area of free expression. * » • The objectionable quality of vagueness and overbreadth does not depend upon absence of fair...