The Law and Higher Education: a Casebook: Students, professors. v. 2. Administration, academic program, tortsJohn Seiler Brubacher Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press, 1971 - 701 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 27
Page 54
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 57
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 58
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 59
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 74
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Contents
3 | |
10 | |
Race | 34 |
Dismissal Private Institutions | 41 |
Dismissal Public Institutions | 68 |
Dismissal Procedure | 117 |
Publications | 149 |
Military Service | 169 |
Dormitories | 184 |
Societies | 193 |
PROFESSORS | 215 |
Appointment | 217 |
Dismissal | 234 |
Conflict of Interest | 256 |
Academic Freedom | 265 |
Loyalty Oaths Fifth Amendment | 312 |
Common terms and phrases
academic activities administrative admission Alabama Alabama State College alleged appears appellee application appointment Aptheker attend authority Bertrand Russell Board of Education Board of Regents Board of Trustees Brooklyn College campus Chadron State College charges citizen claim Communist Party complaint conduct constitutional rights constitutionally contention contract counsel Dean decision defendant demonstrations denied disciplinary action Discipline Committee discretion dismissal District due process educational institutions Emory University employment exercise expulsion fact faculty fees Fourteenth Amendment Frank Wilkinson fraternity freedom further hearing Higher Education Howard University Hunter College involved Judge judgment Lincoln University ment misconduct nonresident North Carolina opinion organization person petition petitioner plaintiffs President privilege procedures proceedings protection provides purpose question reason refused rules and regulations speakers standards statute Stetson University suspension teacher tenure tion Troy State University tuition University University's vague Vassar College versity violation
Popular passages
Page 277 - Accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.
Page 102 - And a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.
Page 49 - Malice in common acceptation means ill-will against a person, but in its legal sense it means a wrongful act done intentionally without just cause or excuse.
Page 131 - consideration of what procedures due process may require under any given set of circumstances must begin with a determination of the precise nature of the government function involved as well as of the private interest that has been affected by governmental action.
Page 32 - No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary as such...
Page 269 - It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest and least repulsive form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure.
Page 236 - Where parties, without any fraud or mistake, have deliberately put their engagements in writing, the law declares the writing to be not only the best but the only, evidence of their agreement; and we are not disposed to relax the rule.
Page 298 - NAACP v. Button, 371 US 415 (438) ; [f]or standards of permissible statutory vagueness are strict in the area of free expression. . . . Because First Amendment freedoms need breathing space to survive, government may regulate in the area only with narrow specificity.
Page 104 - Judicial interposition in the operation of the public school system of the Nation raises problems requiring care and restraint. Our courts, however, have not failed to apply the First Amendment's mandate in our educational system where essential to safeguard the fundamental values of freedom of speech and inquiry and of belief. By and large, public education in our Nation is committed to the control of state and local authorities.
Page 162 - In our system, students may not be regarded as closedcircuit recipients of only that which the state chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved.