The Law and Higher Education: a Casebook: Students, professors. v. 2. Administration, academic program, tortsJohn Seiler Brubacher Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press, 1971 - 701 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 45
Page ix
... Regents ...... American University v . Todd Anthony v . Syracuse University Antonelli v . Hammond Application of Lee ... Regents of University of California 26 Calvary Bible Presbyterian Church v . Board of Regents Carr v . St. John's ...
... Regents ...... American University v . Todd Anthony v . Syracuse University Antonelli v . Hammond Application of Lee ... Regents of University of California 26 Calvary Bible Presbyterian Church v . Board of Regents Carr v . St. John's ...
Page x
... Regents of the University of California 196 Enman v . Trustees of Boston University 677 Esteb v . Esteb ...... 3 Esteban v . Central Missouri State College 112 Ettlinger v . Randolph Macon College 660 Faculty Student Association of ...
... Regents of the University of California 196 Enman v . Trustees of Boston University 677 Esteb v . Esteb ...... 3 Esteban v . Central Missouri State College 112 Ettlinger v . Randolph Macon College 660 Faculty Student Association of ...
Page xi
... Regents of University of Oklahoma 443 Raney v . Board of Trustees , Coalinga Junior College District 237 Reichenberg v . Nelson 78 Rhodes et al . v . Millsaps College 673 Samson v . Trustees of Columbia University 44 Scott v . Joint ...
... Regents of University of Oklahoma 443 Raney v . Board of Trustees , Coalinga Junior College District 237 Reichenberg v . Nelson 78 Rhodes et al . v . Millsaps College 673 Samson v . Trustees of Columbia University 44 Scott v . Joint ...
Page xii
... Regents of University of Nevada .......... State v . Buchanan 359 163 State v . Sims , Auditor 607 State v . State Board of Education et al ........... 212 Steier v . New York State Education Commissioner 144 Sterling v . Regents of ...
... Regents of University of Nevada .......... State v . Buchanan 359 163 State v . Sims , Auditor 607 State v . State Board of Education et al ........... 212 Steier v . New York State Education Commissioner 144 Sterling v . Regents of ...
Page 18
... regents of the University to permit her to continue her course . She had been refused admittance to the third year of work after she had finished the first two years . The case was heard before the court below without a jury . . . . It ...
... regents of the University to permit her to continue her course . She had been refused admittance to the third year of work after she had finished the first two years . The case was heard before the court below without a jury . . . . It ...
Contents
3 | |
10 | |
Race | 34 |
Dismissal Private Institutions | 41 |
Dismissal Public Institutions | 68 |
Dismissal Procedure | 117 |
Publications | 149 |
Military Service | 169 |
Dormitories | 184 |
Societies | 193 |
PROFESSORS | 215 |
Appointment | 217 |
Dismissal | 234 |
Conflict of Interest | 256 |
Academic Freedom | 265 |
Loyalty Oaths Fifth Amendment | 312 |
Common terms and phrases
academic activities administrative admission Alabama Alabama State College alleged appears appellee application appointment Aptheker attend authority Bertrand Russell Board of Education Board of Regents Board of Trustees Brooklyn College campus Chadron State College charges citizen claim Communist Party complaint conduct constitutional rights constitutionally contention contract counsel Dean decision defendant demonstrations denied disciplinary action Discipline Committee discretion dismissal District due process educational institutions Emory University employment exercise expulsion fact faculty fees Fourteenth Amendment Frank Wilkinson fraternity freedom further hearing Higher Education Howard University Hunter College involved Judge judgment Lincoln University ment misconduct nonresident North Carolina opinion organization person petition petitioner plaintiffs President privilege procedures proceedings protection provides purpose question reason refused rules and regulations speakers standards statute Stetson University suspension teacher tenure tion Troy State University tuition University University's vague Vassar College versity violation
Popular passages
Page 277 - Accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.
Page 102 - And a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.
Page 49 - Malice in common acceptation means ill-will against a person, but in its legal sense it means a wrongful act done intentionally without just cause or excuse.
Page 131 - consideration of what procedures due process may require under any given set of circumstances must begin with a determination of the precise nature of the government function involved as well as of the private interest that has been affected by governmental action.
Page 32 - No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary as such...
Page 269 - It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest and least repulsive form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure.
Page 236 - Where parties, without any fraud or mistake, have deliberately put their engagements in writing, the law declares the writing to be not only the best but the only, evidence of their agreement; and we are not disposed to relax the rule.
Page 298 - NAACP v. Button, 371 US 415 (438) ; [f]or standards of permissible statutory vagueness are strict in the area of free expression. . . . Because First Amendment freedoms need breathing space to survive, government may regulate in the area only with narrow specificity.
Page 104 - Judicial interposition in the operation of the public school system of the Nation raises problems requiring care and restraint. Our courts, however, have not failed to apply the First Amendment's mandate in our educational system where essential to safeguard the fundamental values of freedom of speech and inquiry and of belief. By and large, public education in our Nation is committed to the control of state and local authorities.
Page 162 - In our system, students may not be regarded as closedcircuit recipients of only that which the state chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved.