United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volume 446U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... Court of Appeals held that the District Court had abused its discretion by granting the Rule 54 ( b ) certification , since the possibility of a setoff required that the status quo be maintained unless petitioner could show harsh or ...
... Court of Appeals held that the District Court had abused its discretion by granting the Rule 54 ( b ) certification , since the possibility of a setoff required that the status quo be maintained unless petitioner could show harsh or ...
Page 3
... District Court took this into account when it determined that both litigants appeared to be financially sound , and that petitioner would be able to satisfy a judgment on the counterclaims if any were entered . Pp . 11-12 . 597 F. 2d 35 ...
... District Court took this into account when it determined that both litigants appeared to be financially sound , and that petitioner would be able to satisfy a judgment on the counterclaims if any were entered . Pp . 11-12 . 597 F. 2d 35 ...
Page 4
... District Court rejected this contention and granted summary judgment for Curtiss - Wright on this otherwise undis- puted claim . Applying New York law by which the parties had agreed to be bound , the District Court held that Curtiss ...
... District Court rejected this contention and granted summary judgment for Curtiss - Wright on this otherwise undis- puted claim . Applying New York law by which the parties had agreed to be bound , the District Court held that Curtiss ...
Page 5
... court expressly directed entry of final judgment for Curtiss - Wright and made the determination that there was " no just reason for delay " pursuant to Rule 54 ( b ) . The District Court also provided a written statement of reasons ...
... court expressly directed entry of final judgment for Curtiss - Wright and made the determination that there was " no just reason for delay " pursuant to Rule 54 ( b ) . The District Court also provided a written statement of reasons ...
Page 8
... Court 446 U.S. Once having found finality , the district court must go on to determine whether there is any just reason for delay . Not all final judgments on individual claims should be immediately appealable , even if they are in some ...
... Court 446 U.S. Once having found finality , the district court must go on to determine whether there is any just reason for delay . Not all final judgments on individual claims should be immediately appealable , even if they are in some ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action Administrator affirmed alleged amicus curiae application Attorney authority benefits Bivens BLACKMUN BRENNAN C. A. 2d Cir C. A. 5th Cir cert Certiorari denied civil claims Clause concluded concurring Cong Congress constitutional Corp counsel County Court of Appeals decision defendant determination discrimination discriminatory dissenting 446 U.S. District Court EEOC effect election electoral employer enforcement Equal Protection Clause fact federal courts Fifteenth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment Georgia Government granted held intent issue judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE lands liability Louisiana MARSHALL ment multimember districts Negroes nonforfeitable officers oil shale Opinion parties PBGC penalty petitioner petitioner's plaintiff police political POWELL preclearance purpose question racial reason REHNQUIST remanded remedy Reported respondent respondent's scienter sentence Sess Sixth Amendment Stat statute of limitations statutory STEVENS STEWART Supp supra Supreme Court Taylor Grazing Act tion Title trial trust United violation vote WHITE
Popular passages
Page 40 - Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
Page 320 - ... (3) the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. The matters pertinent to the findings include: (A) the interest of members of the class in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions; (B) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning...
Page 634 - The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States...
Page 642 - When a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this section, shall be of the opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, he shall so state in writing in such order.
Page 174 - is not prohibited by but is consistent with 'the letter and spirit of the constitution,' " regardless of whether the practices outlawed by Congress in themselves violated the Equal Protection Clause. 384 US, at 651 (quoting McCulloch v. Maryland, supra, at 421). The Court stated that, "[c]orrectly viewed, § 5 is a positive grant of legislative power authorizing Congress to exercise its discretion in determining whether and what legislation is needed to secure the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Page 686 - To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or (c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.
Page 58 - MARSHALL announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR.
Page 695 - ... (2) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or (3) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.
Page 5 - When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parries only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment.
Page 296 - By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.