COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JAMES O. EASTLAND, Mississippi, Chairman JOHN L. MCCLELLAN, Arkansas EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts QUENTIN BURDICK, North Dakota ROMAN L. HRUSKA, Nebraska STROM THURMOND, South Carolina SUBCOMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JOHN L. MCCLELLAN, Arkansas ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia EDWARD J. GURNEY,* Florida HIRAM L. FONG, Hawaii STROM THURMOND, South Carolina LAWRENCE M. BASKIR, Chief Counsel and Staff Director Appointed subcommittee member on 1/31/73. **Subcommittee member until 1/31/73. (11) CONTENTS PART I. The nature of domestic intelligence... Purposes of the domestic intelligence program. Early warning of civil disorders.. Reconnaissance of potential riot areas. Organization for domestic intelligence- U.S. Army Intelligence Command (USAINTC) U.S. Continental Army Command (CONARC). Annex B (intelligence) to the DA civil disturbance plan_. The Department of the Army civil disturbance collection plan......... Page PART I. The nature of domestic intelligence-Continued Continental Commands Subordinate to CONARC. 2. Third Army.. 5. Sixth Army. 6. Military District of Washington_ Page 73 73 73 74 76 76 77 Counterintelligence analysis branch.. U.S. Strike Command... 77 80 Directorate for civil disturbance planning and operations- The decision to cut back_ The McGiffert memorandum__ The interdepartmental action plan... Surveillance after the 1969 directives.. The new directives_. The March 6, 1970, computer ban.. The July 31, 1970, letter on racial matters. The Laird order of December 23, 1970_. The DOD directive of March 1, 1971.. The Defense Investigative Review Council (DIRC) Effect of the new directives__ Deception, cover-up and noncompliance: 1970 and beyond. PART II. The legality of surveillance_-_ 102 Is military surveillance authorized by law?. 103 Did military surveillance violate the first amendment?. 109 Is the infringement of constitutional rights justified by a compelling 115 CONCLUSION_ 117 APPENDIX.. 119 |