Administration of Criminal Justice: Oversight Hearings Before the Committee on the District of Columbia, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 2071 pages |
Contents
| 1117 | |
| 1120 | |
| 1121 | |
| 1143 | |
| 1158 | |
| 1169 | |
| 1172 | |
| 1231 | |
| 1447 | |
| 1449 | |
| 1534 | |
| 1539 | |
| 1546 | |
| 1548 | |
| 1552 | |
| 1553 | |
| 1286 | |
| 1289 | |
| 1292 | |
| 1307 | |
| 1313 | |
| 1319 | |
| 1320 | |
| 1322 | |
| 1325 | |
| 1331 | |
| 1340 | |
| 1341 | |
| 1363 | |
| 1374 | |
| 1377 | |
| 1384 | |
| 1385 | |
| 1390 | |
| 1393 | |
| 1404 | |
| 1421 | |
| 1424 | |
| 1425 | |
| 1432 | |
| 1434 | |
| 1554 | |
| 1578 | |
| 1579 | |
| 1589 | |
| 1590 | |
| 1593 | |
| 1597 | |
| 1600 | |
| 1609 | |
| 1614 | |
| 1630 | |
| 1631 | |
| 1641 | |
| 1645 | |
| 1648 | |
| 1649 | |
| 1651 | |
| 1657 | |
| 1665 | |
| 1832 | |
| 1865 | |
| 1927 | |
| iii | |
| iv | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administration adult agencies aggravated assaults Arlington Arlington County assigned assistance BIESTER Burglary CHAIRMAN Chief CULLINANE citizens committed Committee compensation coordination court system Crime Index Criminal Justice Act criminal justice system D.C. Code defender organizations delinquency District Court District of Columbia Division Fairfax City Fairfax County Federal felony firearms funds GUN CONTROL handguns handle included increase Index Offenses indigent investigation involved judicial jurisdiction jury trial juvenile court larceny law enforcement lawyer legislation Maryland ment metropolitan area Metropolitan Police Department misdemeanor Montgomery County narcotics newsmen non-resident arrests operation panel Park Police patrol percent PERCENTAGE personnel persons arrested police officers present Prince George's County probation problem prosecution prosecutors Public Defender Public Defender Service question rape recommendations representation residents responsibility robbery Section sentence statement statute Superior Court tion traffic U.S. attorney U.S. Park Police United Virginia vouchers
Popular passages
Page 1720 - Even so, they are not of the very essence of a scheme of ordered liberty. To abolish them is not to violate a "principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.
Page 1730 - If the formalities of the criminal adjudicative process are to be superimposed upon the juvenile court sys-tem, there is little need for its separate existence. Perhaps that ultimate disillusionment will come one day, but for the moment we are disinclined to give impetus to it.
Page 2023 - ... that a reasonable person would expect to be disseminated by means of public communication...
Page 2026 - ... shall not make or participate in making an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person would expect to be disseminated by public communication and that is reasonably likely to affect the imposition of sentence.
Page 1925 - The plan should be designed to guarantee the integrity of the relationship between lawyer and client. The plan and the lawyers serving under it should be free from political influence and should be subject to judicial supervision only in the same manner and to the same extent as are lawyers in private practice.
Page 2026 - The possibility of a plea of guilty to the offense charged or to a lesser offense. (3) The existence or contents of any confession, admission, or statement given by the accused or his refusal or failure to make a statement. (4) The performance or results of any examinations or tests or the refusal or failure of the accused to submit to examinations or tests. (5) The identity, testimony, or credibility of a prospective witness.
Page 2026 - Any opinion as to the guilt or Innocence of the accused, the evidence, or the merits of the case.
Page 1736 - The knowledge that every criminal trial is subject to contemporaneous review in the forum of public opinion is an effective restraint on possible abuse of judicial power.
Page 1719 - Because we believe that trial by jury in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice, we hold that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees a right of jury trial in all criminal cases which — were they to be tried in a federal court — would come within the Sixth Amendment's guarantee.