Page images
PDF
EPUB

The regulation of mining activities also fits within
the general ambit of tribes' powers of self-govern-
ment. Tribal regulatory programs which may resuļt
from an amendment to SMCRA could supplement this
inherent right.

Congress has enacted a series of laws, beginning
with the Trade and Intercourse acts in the 1700's
that prohibit the conveyance (e.g., by lease) of
tribal resources without the concurrence of the
federal government. The Mineral Leasing Acts passed
in the 1920's and 1930's compel the Secretary of the
Interior to act as trustee for tribal mineral re-

sources. This trust responsibility has
has been ex-
ercised by both the
by both the BIA and GS. Consequently,
potential Indian programs (Tribal or Federal) under
SMCRA also must incorporate the approvals of the
trustee in all decisions affecting mineral and other

resources.

Tribe-Specific Factors

Each tribe has a unique basis for exercising its governmental authority. These differences produce variations among tribal regulatory

activities.

41

For example:

The land and resources promised in treaties, ex-
ecutive orders, and statutes differ from tribe to
tribe. The impact of the General Allotment Act of
1887 which, until 1934 fragmented reservation lands
for tribal members, also varied among and within re-
servations. Thus, in some mine areas a tribe may
act as both the owner and a government, but in other
areas it may regulate using its governmental powers
only.

All tribal regulatory programs will derive their
authority from an enabling clause in the organic
document (e.g., Constitution or Code) approved by
the tribe. Although all of the necessary powers
inherently reside in the tribes, the authorities
explicitly granted to the governing bodies vary. In
some cases, the documents may have to be amended to
clarify the grant of authority for such programs.

BIA is responsible for the economic, environmental, and other terms of the agreement (e.g., lease); GS is responsible for inspections and enforcing the development stipulations.

4-8

Tribes may be expected
be expected to vary in how regulatory
agencies are established, to whom the officials are
accountable, and how decisions are reviewed. These
organizational decisions may be determined by the
powers assigned to each "branch" of government in
the enabling documents and/or related resolutions.

The formal "checks and balances" among tribal of-
ficials will differ from tribe to tribe depending on
the form of government instituted in the Constitu-
tion or Code.

The grant of authority
authority to the Secretary of the
Interior to review or approve tribal decisions,
including ordinances, will differ among the tribal
Consitutions and Codes.

The following two sections present a summary perspective on the organization and administration of the governments of the coal-owning tribes participating in this study. More detailed individual reports on the governments of the major coal-owning tribes are included in CERT's Tribal Governmental Organization (April 1979).

TRIBAL GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION

The evolution of tribal governments began long before the inception of the American political system. Tribes differed widely in their approaches to self-governance. At one end of the spectrum, it is noteworthy that the "Five Nations" of Iroquois adopted a formal Constitution before the Continent was discovered by Columbus. They established such principles as intiative, recall, referendum, equal suffrage, and the accountability of the government to both present and future generations. The Plains tribes have been characterized by one specialist as

5/

5/ Cohen, Felix. op. cit. p. 128.

4-9

being "democratic, one-man-one-vote societies" that emphasized "agreement by concensus, inhibition against speaking or acting for another, and a justice system that [made] the well-being of the group more imporOn the other

tant than retribution against the erring individual."/

hand, many of the southwestern tribal organizations are based on theocratic customs, rituals and oral traditions, with key decisions ren

dered by religious elders of the tribe.7/

For

Since the time that they negotiated treaties with the U.S., tribal governments have changed in response response to changing circumstances. example, many tribal systems were altered when they were moved to reservations that could not support their way of life. In some cases, the reservations were shared by more than one tribe, thus forcing a merger of different traditions. The Allotment Act and the Homesteading Acts weakened some tribal governments by reducing their land and resource base; by replacing the Indian concept of community property with that of individual ownership, and by increasing the population of non-Indian residents on the reservation. Similarly, the Indian Reorganization Act spurred the adoption of Constitutions and By-Laws based on American models of government. Consequently, present-day tribal governments reflect each tribe's unique approach to accommodate these forces within

their traditional framework.

6/

7/

McNickle, D'Arcy.

Act:
Past

"Tribal Government and the Indian Reorganization Government by Consent." in Tribal Constitutions: Their Their Future, ed. by James J. Lopach, Margery H. H. Brown, Kathleen Jackson. Missoula: University of Montana Press, August 1978, p. 11.

Sekaquaptewa, Abbott. "What is Good Tribal Government?" in Tribal
Constitutions: Their Past - Future, ed. by James J. Lopach, Margery
H. Brown, Kathleen Jackson. Missoula: University of Montana Press,
August 1978, p. 36.

rent

The following materials summarize certain key aspects of the cur

organizational structure of the twenty-five tribal governments participating in this study. (See Table 4-1). The discussion includes background information on the following characteristics: (1) the establishment of reservations; (2) the formal basis of the government (e.g., Constitutions or similar "organic" documents); (3) the authorities that may be exercised by the government; and (4) the structure of the government (e.g., governing bodies and officials).

organizations."

The following discussion should be viewed with two caveats. First, few generalizations can be made with accuracy about "tribal government Each one is unique, and should be analyzed on an individual basis (See the full report on Tribal Governmental Organizations for more complete profiles). And second, these materials should not be construed as a legal interpretation of tribal government powers or procedures. Such analysis can only be done on a tribe-by-tribe basis by qualified attorneys.

Reservation Establishment

One precondition to self-government is a geographic base to support the livelihood of the the people. The principles of Indian territorial rights date back to the original treaties between tribes and the colonial governments. Since that time, the land and resources reserved for tribes have been defined and modified by a series of treaty revisions, executive orders, statutes, and acquisitions.

Continent.

Early treaties recognized Indian claims to the territory of the Declarations regarding "Indian Country" respected tribal sovereignty within those areas. However, after the colonial wars ended, the American sentiment was that the Indians would be absorbed into the

general population.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Big Horn, Rosebud

LaPlata, Archuleta, Montezuma

Dunn, McLean, McKenzie, Mountrail, Mercer
Uintah, Duschesne, Grand

Northern Cheyenne

Mouache & Capote Ute

Mandan, Hidasta, Arikara
Ute

[blocks in formation]

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce.

[blocks in formation]

Federal and State Indian Reservations and Indian Trust Areas.

« PreviousContinue »