Miscellaneous Veterans' Bills: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Veterans' Affairs of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, United States Senate, Eighty-sixth Congress, Second Session on S. 299, S. 2201, [and] S. 2235U.S. Government Printing Office, 1960 - 48 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 10
Page 7
... status . The legal effect of the bill would be to presume that an extended period of training duty under these special circumstances was " active duty " for the purposes of readjustment benefits now available only to those who were in a ...
... status . The legal effect of the bill would be to presume that an extended period of training duty under these special circumstances was " active duty " for the purposes of readjustment benefits now available only to those who were in a ...
Page 9
... status and await Selective Service action along with other college graduates . Those ROTC graduates who accepted enlistment in the Air Force and those who were inducted into the military service under the Universal Military Train- ing ...
... status and await Selective Service action along with other college graduates . Those ROTC graduates who accepted enlistment in the Air Force and those who were inducted into the military service under the Universal Military Train- ing ...
Page 13
... status of Alaska and Hawaii has changed , but the geographical , transporta- tion , and population factors are just as they were prior to statehood . Alaska remains 586,000 square miles in size . Air transportation pro- vides the sole ...
... status of Alaska and Hawaii has changed , but the geographical , transporta- tion , and population factors are just as they were prior to statehood . Alaska remains 586,000 square miles in size . Air transportation pro- vides the sole ...
Page 29
... status now enjoy all veterans ' benefits . I , along with approximately 1,500 men in the same status , entered the Air Force prior to January 31 , 1955 , the cutoff period for the GI bill . Even though we had the " for training " part ...
... status now enjoy all veterans ' benefits . I , along with approximately 1,500 men in the same status , entered the Air Force prior to January 31 , 1955 , the cutoff period for the GI bill . Even though we had the " for training " part ...
Page 31
... status and await possible selective service induction . Those graduates who selected enlistment in the Air Force or who remained in a civilian status would not be affected by S. 2235 . The other major category , namely , those 3,500 who ...
... status and await possible selective service induction . Those graduates who selected enlistment in the Air Force or who remained in a civilian status would not be affected by S. 2235 . The other major category , namely , those 3,500 who ...
Common terms and phrases
86th Congress active duty Administration hospital Air Force Reserve Air Force ROTC Air National Guard airman Alaska and Hawaii American Legion beds BOWERS Colonel BERG Congress contract hospitals Dalworth Ebner Dean Click delimiting date Department of Defense duty for training eligible enactment enlistment erans Force Reserve Officers Foreign Wars Gruening GUNDLACH HARRY MCPHERSON hospitals in Alaska January 31 Kauai Ketchikan Korean GI bill Labor and Public legislation LISTER HILL MCPHERSON non-service-connected disabilities OLSON patients period pital private facilities private hospitals Public Law 16 Readjustment Assistance Act readjustment benefits received referred to follows rehabilitation relief of Dalworth ROTC graduates section 99 Senator BARTLETT Senator GOLDWATER Senator Humphrey Senator YARBOROUGH served on active service-connected disability statement subcommittee term Veterans third class title 38 training duty treatment U.S. AIR FORCE U.S. Senate United States Code University of Texas veterans in Alaska Veterans of Foreign veterans with non-service-connected vocational
Popular passages
Page 6 - USC 757e), is amended by inserting immediately before the period at the end thereof a comma and the following : "except that the State of Idaho may be a participant under this Act".
Page 4 - Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Vnited States of America in Congress assembled, That...
Page 5 - ... should also be true of these two new States. Use of private contract facilities in Alaska and Hawaii, as States, for providing hospital care to veterans with conditions not growing out of their service might well become a precedent for authorizing the use of contract facilities in other States. Veterans needing care for service-connected conditions in both Alaska and Hawaii will, of course, continue to receive that care in private contract hospitals wherever necessary. The basic law applicable...
Page 5 - Administration was deprived of its general authority to provide contract hospital care there for veterans suffering from non-serviceconnected disabilities. It has long been Government policy to provide hospital care for our war veterans for conditions not related to their service only to the extent of available Government facilities. It has not been the policy to attempt to care for all such cases.
Page 5 - ... are available in VA or other Federal hospitals. This exception, according to the Veterans Administrator, in a report to this committee, is based upon "special considerations." Said considerations include the factors of great distances from the mainland, difficulty in transferring patients to other States, and the relatively small volume of patient demands in the territories and possessions. Without commenting as to whether these "special considerations...
Page 10 - ... disabilities in territories and possessions of the United States and in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Before Alaska and Hawaii became States this special provision of law was applicable for the benefit of veterans living there. However, with the coming of statehood this valuable benefit was lost, as the law does not provide for contracts for hospital care of veterans with non-service-connected disabilities in the States. The effect of the law results in an unintentional but serious discrimination...
Page 10 - STATEMENT OF HON. ERNEST GRUENING, A US SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA Senator GRUENING.
Page 2 - Hon. LISTER HILL, Chairman, Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, V.8. Senate, Washington, DC MY DEAR MR.
Page 5 - But arrangements have been made in both to care for war veterans with non-serviceconnected disabilities in other Government hospitals. In Alaska, we have beds allocated for VA beneficiaries in hospitals of the Department of Defense and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Page 12 - STATEMENT OF HON. EL BARTLETT, A US SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA Mr. Chairman, I am pleased today to add my support to S. 5, the Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1963.