Page images

3. In many instances private agencies assume that there is U.S. Government policy objection to their supplying scientific and technical information to certain foreign countries. Since Russia and its satellites can easily obtain such information through agents in the United States or in Western Europe, any such ban has no practical effect in withholding unclassified scientific data from Russia. It is recommended that private agencies originating unclassified scientific and technical information should be encouraged to make such information available to foreign agencies and institutions by sale, exchange, or gift.

4. Since many friendly countries that can profitably utilize many types of scientific and technical documents are not in a position to purchase them and have little to offer in exchange, it is recommended that arrangements be made by the appropriate Government agencies to donate their scientific and technical publications and reports to friendly countries on the basis of their ability to profit from receiving them, where such countries are not in a position to purchase the documents, or to offer equivalent materials in exchange.

5. On the basis that significant scientific and technical publications and reports originating outside the United States are of definite interest and value to many U.S. scientists, and will contribute to their effectiveness, it is recommended that efforts be intensified to ensure that all significant scientific and technical publications originating outside the United States are procured for use in the United States; are available in some form to any interested U.S. scientist; are abstracted in the appropriate English language abstract journals; and, if especially important, and appearing in some inaccessible language (e.g., Slavic or oriental languages) are translated into English.

6. Since many U.S. scientific and technical reference tools are of unique value on a worldwide basis (e.g., Chemical Abstracts) it is recommended that efforts be intensified to improve the quality of U.S. basic scientific reference tools (abstracts and bibliographies) in support of world science. B. Exchange of persons

The following recommendations are intended to strengthen United States and international science through expanding the opportunities of U.S. scientists to study abroad as well as to work and confer with scientists of other nations, and through offering continued opportunities for foreign scientists to visit and study in the United States. Such actions as are proposed should result in strengthened scientific manpower at home and abroad, and should assure a greater utilization of the scientific resources of the United States and the rest of the free world.

1. There is need on the part of the Federal Government for continuity and greater program emphasis focused upon the objective of increasing throughout the world the supply of gifted scientists and improving the quality of their training. Current Government-supported programs have been supplemented by the activities of private foundations and organizations, among them the recently established Eisenhower exchange fellowships which are awarded to foreign nationals for advanced study and work in the United States in a wide range of fields.

It is therefore recommended that current exchange of persons activities of the Federal Government be broadened to include countries not now participating and to allow increased numbers of scientists to be exchanged in both directions. If necessary, authorization should be sought for new programs directed specifically to the exchange of scientists.

2. In recent years there has been increasing concern with the restrictions imposed by the Federal law which became effective in December 1952 on the temporary admission of alien visitors. Evidence has been cited previously by the National Science Foundation that under existing statutes a large percentage of all foreign scientists who apply to enter the United States meet difficulties or serious delays. These delays as well as actual refusals of permission for entry damage the United States in its international scientific relationships. Accordingly, it is recommended that the law governing the temporary admission of alien visitors be reviewed in order to determine how it might be modified to improve procedures and more readily permit the temporary admission of scientists and students in the sciences.

3. There are indications that the United States has not been able to play as positive a role in supporting international scientific congresses and meetings as its position of international leadership would suggest, both because of the visa problems associated with holding such meetings in the United States and because of the limited funds available for such purposes. To illustrate the first point, the International Congress on Genetics recommended in 1953 that its international meetings not be held in any country where “scientists would be refused permission to enter on grounds of race, nationality, place of birth, or political association, past or present.” Funds for support of international scientific meetings in foreign countries have generally been limited to defrayment of travel expenses of some of the U.S. participants.

Therefore, it is recommended that the United States should actively and wholeheartedly support international scientific congresses and meetings. This should include review of the visa law as indicated in (2) above, and the provision of adequate funds for necessary support of international scientific congresses and meetings.

4. The opportunity for American scientists to attend international scientific meetings is of great importance in that it fosters the exchange of scientific information for the mutual benefit of the participating nations. It provides U.S. scientists with a knowledge of foreign research activities and personnel which results in increased competence of these persons and it strengthens the international position of the United States. It is recommended that the United States participate more actively in international scientific meetings. New legislative authority is not in most instances required for such increased par. ticipation. It will be necessary, however, that modest funds be appropriated annually in order to carry out the intent of this recommendation. C. Support of fundamental research

It is recommended that a program of further support of basic research in foreign countries be undertaken on a limited and experimental basis with funds being provided by non military sources.

The support of basic research in foreign countries by the United States should be on a limited and experimental basis. Such support in foreign countries should be limited to those areas of science where unique competence exists or where breakthroughs might be particularly significant. In order that the motives underlying such support be not misunderstood, it is important that the support be provided from nonmilitary sources.

Special attention might well be given to the support of basic research in foreign countries with appropriate capabilities where this might be regarded as an extension to the President's atoms-for-peace plan. In the case of certain countries, notably Japan, such support would be a considerable factor in creating goodwill, out of all proportion of the funds expended. D. Support of applied research and development

It is recommended that support be provided for applied research and development activities in foreign countries where the results of the research are of direct practical value to the supporting agency, or where the end item of the applied research and development is directly related to the mission of the supporting agency,

Support of applied research and certain phases of technological development in a foreign country can be of immediate benefit to the foreign country and to the United States. It is of direct benefit to the United States in providing an extension of the total research and development effort, without simultaneously aggravating further our scientific manpower problems. It is of advantage to the foreign country in providing hard currency support for activities which will be to its long range advantage in the development of its industrial technology.

However, applied research and development is, and should remain, an area to be supported only as determined by the agency of the Government responsible for the special program to which it relates. In other words, applied research and development abroad should continue to be supported by the military agencies to the extent they deem appropriate in the light of military objectives, by ICA in the light of economic objectives, etc. It is recommended, however, that any new congressional authorization that may be given for support of international science, as herein recommended, contain authority for the support of applied science projects judged to be of direct benefit to the United States. Such author. ity is needed to fill a gap between existing authorization to support basic research where it is in the general interest of U.S. science and authority to support applied science where it is in the support of military or economic objectives. E. Improvement in scientific manpower potential of friendly and neutral countries

The college contract and foreign research scientist fellowship programs of ICA are contributing significantly, but not to an optimum degree, in improving the quantity and quality of scientific manpower in other countries. Additional support to this objective by the United States will not only serve to build up free world strength but also will tend to meet partially the need of the United States for new fundamental scientific knowledge.

1. It is recommended that the foreign research scientist fellowship program of ICA be continued, to the extent that such action is consistent with the economic objectives of ICA.

2. It is recommended that the college contract program of ICA be expanded to include additional “science components” to the extent that such action is. consistent with the economic ectives of ICA.

3. It is recommended that congressional authorization be sought for the National Science Foundation or other agencies to grant fellowships to science students from friendly and neutral countries to pursue advanced study in the United States. F. Scientific representation and liaison

Among the necessary elements of a successful U.S. program in international science are the following: (a) effective machinery for bringing to bear the potentialities and interests of science upon the day-to-day formulation and conduct of international relations; (b) full participation and cooperation by the United States in international scientific organizations; and (c) an adequate system of scientific liaison offices in American missions abroad, with provision being made for representation, the collection and distribution of specific items of information as required, and advice to the chief of mission on the scientific aspects of problems being faced by him. The following recommendations are directed toward the provision of the aforementioned elements.

1. It is recommended that the role of the science adviser to the Secretary of State be strengthened, to the end that the conduct of U.S. foreign affairs may continuously reflect the increasingly important role which science and technology must play in relations between the United States and other countries.

This problem was treated exhaustively in the report of Dr. L. V. Berkner to the Secretary of State in April 1950 (published by the Department of State as “Science and Foreign Relations”). While the Berkner recommendations resulted in the establishment of an Office of Science Adviser, this office has not as yet received status commensurate with its responsibilities.

2. It is recommended that the U.S. Government take immediate steps to insure full and prompt fulfillment of U.S. membership obligations in international scientific organizations.

Damage has been done to the prestige of the United States in foreign countries as a result of delays and arrears on the payment of membership dues in ICSU and its constituent unions. Similar difficulties have arisen from time to time with respect to U.S. contributions to the specialized agencies of the United Nations.

3. It is recommended that a new science attaché program be established providing for broad geographic coverage and numerically adequate complements in U.S. missions abroad. These attachés should be backstopped by a civilian scientific agency of the Government.

At the present time, the Department of State provides science attachés to only four of its overseas missions, and these appointments are due to expire in the near future. The present attaché program has been allowed to languish and has not produced the results foreseen in the Berkner report. Steps must be taken to provide the backstopping necessary to enable the attachés to pursue actively what are important scientific responsibilities in foreign countries.

4. It is recommended that a high degree of interagency coordination be achieved in the operations of official U.S. scientific liaison activities abroad.

It is essential that there be no competition between various elements of U.S. liaison activities, and that all such groups maintain a consolidated U.S. position in their dealings with foreign governments and individuals.

5. It is recommended that private interests in the United States who plan overseas liaison offices or projects in science and technology be encouraged and provided with guidance and advice from qualified governmental sources in order to assure actions consistent with U.S. foreign policy objectives. G. Some criteria which might guide activities of the Federal Government in the

advancement of science internationally 1. There are advantages to the use of multilateral channels, such as international organizations, where feasible. It is especially important that activities of the U.S. Government in the area of science not be tagged internationally as another weapon in our cold war arsenal (although in fact, the activities proposed herein, ostensibly divorced from cold war objectives, would constitute effective weapons

indeed). The use of such multilateral channels would minimize such a possi-

2. Collective efforts among groups of countries in the advancement of science
as a general rule yield returns in terms of a larger community of science than accrue
from support of efforts of individual countries. Where feasible, the United States
should support cooperative research projects undertaken by two or more countries
or by regional or other organizations.

3. Other considerations being equal, special attention should be given to those
countries having relatively large reservoirs of underutilized (or less than fully
utilized) scientific talent in relation to financial resources (e.g., certain South
American countries, Japan, Italy, etc.).

4. Bilateral support activities of the U.S. Government should be based upon
a formal framework of government-to-government bilateral agreements where
necessary. While there is need for minimizing the role of government vis-a-vis
science, and while every effort should be made to keep the bilateral agreements
as flexible as possible, the "sovereignty-consciousness” of most countries with
respect to external aid is so strong and widespread as to make self-defeating any
attempted bypassing of local institutions of government.
H. Program magnitude

1. The magnitude of financial support by the U.S. Government in behalf of the
advancement of science in other countries where such support constitutes an
integral part of a program directed to other U.S. objectives (e.g., military, eco-
nomic, etc.) should be as dictated by the considerations underlying those other
objectives. In other words, no attempt should be made to enlarge the science
components of military or economic aid programs unless essential to the success
of those programs. To do otherwise would be to confuse program objectives
unnecessarily (although this would be the easy road to more Federal funds for
the support of science abroad). On the contrary, it would be desirable to screen
out those science projects now being supported under special programs which are
peripheral to the missions of such programs and to place these projects under the
aegis of a general international science program.

2. The magnitude of additional financial support by the U.S. Government to
the advancement of science abroad, as an end in itself, as recommended in this
report, must be small to begin with and never more than "modest." Due to
its nature, much experimentation will be required and a great deal will depend
upon the discrimination with which it is applied.
I. Program framework

1. It is not possible without intensive interagency study and consultation, to
propose assignment of responsibilities or the organizational framework within
the executive branch to carry out the program recommended herein. The
Department of State, the National Science Foundation, the Atomic Energy
Commission, the Smithsonian Institution, the Department of Commerce, and
other agencies of the Government would be concerned in particular areas of the

2. What is needed at the immediate next stage is interagency consideration of
the broad issues involved in the proposed enlargement of the activities of the
Federal Government in the field of international science. Questions of agency
responsibility and organization come into focus at a later stage.

[ocr errors]



[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]








(Pursuant to S. Res. 115, 86th Cong.)

Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Operations







« PreviousContinue »