Page images
PDF
EPUB

Table A.7. Anthropogenic emissions of other greenhouse gases, 1990

[blocks in formation]

* Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Japan, Spain and Switzerland did not report emissions for these gases. "Estimates provided during the review.

Notes

Comments

The guidelines encouraged Parties to provide emission
estimates and information on "other" greenhouse gases. However,
the information provided was scarce both in terms of Parties'
reporting estimates and of gases addressed. Several Parties
recognized that consumption of HFCs will increase.

The IPCC 1994 Special Report provides GWPs for 12 HFCs and for
four PFCs. Of these, some Parties reported estimates for three
HFCs and two PFCs. In addition, three Parties provided
information for SF..

Page 71

English

A/AC.237/819

Page 72

English

A/AC.237/81

[blocks in formation]

Table A.8. Anthropogenic emissions of precursor gases, 1990 (Gigagrams)

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

Canada

10 225

4

2.090

2 104

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Notes

"Estimates corrected during the review.

"The electricity import correction of 0.7 Gg was subtracted by the secretariat from the subtotal given in the communication.

• The electricity import correction of 24 Gg was subtracted by the secretariat from
the subtotal given in the communication.

The electricity import correction of 0.1 Gg was subtracted by the secretariat from
the subtotal given in the communication.
Comments

The guidelines encouraged Parties to provide information on
ozone precursors. However, reporting of related emissions estimates
varied greatly, making comparison across Parties difficult. All
Parties reported emission estimates for the precursor gases, with the
exception of one Party, which only reported estimates for NO,.
Information provided was limited for the agriculture, land use
change and forestry and waste source/sink categories; the

Estimates from the Party expressed as N,O.

Non-ferrous emissions reported as being <0.1 have not been included in this table.
Provisional data for emissions from international aircraft ground movement and
landing and take-off cycle, as well as coastal shipping were provided during the
review and subtracted by the secretariat from related emission figures in the UK
supplementary submission dated 24 August 1994.

"Emissions from the Party's territories were not estimated.

[graphic]
[blocks in formation]

Figure A.4. Relative contribution of different greenhouse gases by Party *

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Excludes land use change and forestry.

Other includes PFCs, HFCs, and SF

for comparative purposes. IPCC-1994 GWP values with a time-horizon of 100 years, previously unavailable, were used by the secretariat

New Zealand reported emissions for PFCs of 0.1 Gg. The secretariat has assumed that approximately 5 per cent of these emissions are from C,F, and the remaining 95 per cent from CF..

Comments

CO, was the most significant anthropogenic greenhouse gas representing 75 per cent of total emissions reported.

For 13 Parties, CO, contributed more than 70 per cent of
total greenhouse gas emissions. The relative importance of other
gases varied from Party to Party. For one Party, the contribution

of CH was larger than that of CO2. In another case, the importance of other gases was higher than for any other Party because of aluminium smelting.

Page 73

English

A/AC.237/81

[graphic]

g:\review\usa\usarep2.fin Draft 26 January 1996

UNITED STATES

Report on the in-depth review of the national communication of the United States of America

Review team:

Rodito Buan, Philippines
Alexey O. Kokorin, Russian Federation
Hhhe Kvist, Sweden

Trevor Morgan, International Energy Agency
Robert Hornung. Consultant

Peer Stiansen, UNFCCC secretariat, Coordinator

Under Articles 4 and 12 of the Convention, Parties are required in prepare national communications on their implementation of the Convention. Guidelines for the preparation of national communications and the process for their review were agreed on by the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change, by its decisions 9/2 and 10/1, and by the Conference of the Parties, at its first session, by its decisions 2/CP.1 and 3/CP.1 (see FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1). In accordance with these decisions, a compilation and synthesis of the first 15 national communications from Annex I Parties was prepared (A/AC.237/81).

When reviewing the implementation of the Convention by Parties, the subsidiary bodies and the Conference of the Parties will have this report available to them in English as well as the summary of the report in the six official languages of the United Nations. (These bodies will also have before them the executive summary of the first national communication of the United States of America and country-specific information drawn from a compilation and synthesis report covering all countries that have submitted national communications.)

« PreviousContinue »