Rewriting the Rules: Report, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 - 55 pages On January 20, 2001, President Bush's Chief of Staff Andrew Card issued a directive to all federal agency heads not to put into effect any rules or regulations until they were reviewed by the new administration. A number of regulations were reversed. Senator Lieberman asked Governmental Affairs Committee staff to review the Card memo and its effect on three rules that had previously been final: the Department of Agriculture's rule conserving roadless areas in national forests, the Department of the Interior's rule regulating hard roc mining on public lands, and the Environmental Protection Agency's rule capping the permissible level of arsenic in drinking water. The report concludes that the Card memo was of questionable legality and that the administration has demonstrated lack of respect for established regulatory procedures. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 19
Page
... Arsenic in Drinking Water Standard ( 1 ) The Rule's Development ( 2 ) Arsenic Rule Targeted for Change ..... ( 3 ) Additional Study and Decision to Retain Standard Page 1 6 8 8 8 11 14 14 15 18 19 21 27 29 32 35 39 41 43 45 52 ...
... Arsenic in Drinking Water Standard ( 1 ) The Rule's Development ( 2 ) Arsenic Rule Targeted for Change ..... ( 3 ) Additional Study and Decision to Retain Standard Page 1 6 8 8 8 11 14 14 15 18 19 21 27 29 32 35 39 41 43 45 52 ...
Page 2
... rule lowering the per- missible limit for arsenic in drinking water . The rule brought the U.S. standard in line with that set by the World Health Organi- zation and followed by the European Union . The development of each of these ...
... rule lowering the per- missible limit for arsenic in drinking water . The rule brought the U.S. standard in line with that set by the World Health Organi- zation and followed by the European Union . The development of each of these ...
Page 5
... arsenic in the rule are sup- ported by the best available science ... standard , even though the SDWA assigns EPA , not OMB , the responsibility ... standard as " promptly as possible . " After 9 months of review , the Bush ...
... arsenic in the rule are sup- ported by the best available science ... standard , even though the SDWA assigns EPA , not OMB , the responsibility ... standard as " promptly as possible . " After 9 months of review , the Bush ...
Page 15
... standard for arsenic in drinking water 48 increased those concerns , thereby prompting Senator Lieberman to send ... standard lowering the amount of arsenic allowed in drinking water.49 The documents ulti- mately provided to the ...
... standard for arsenic in drinking water 48 increased those concerns , thereby prompting Senator Lieberman to send ... standard lowering the amount of arsenic allowed in drinking water.49 The documents ulti- mately provided to the ...
Page 41
... Arsenic in Drinking Water Standard The Bush Administration's desire to reconsider environmental regulations that had been subject to extensive consideration re- peated itself with the EPA's regulation regarding arsenic in drink- ing ...
... Arsenic in Drinking Water Standard The Bush Administration's desire to reconsider environmental regulations that had been subject to extensive consideration re- peated itself with the EPA's regulation regarding arsenic in drink- ing ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administration's Administrator Whitman agency's April Arsenic in Drinking arsenic rule arsenic standard Bush Administration Card memo Congress contained costs court cyanide D.C. Cir decision delay Director documents draft Drinking Water E-mail effective date Environment Environmental Protection Agency EPA's exemption February 9 Federal Land Federal Register filed final rule Ground Water hardrock mining implementation Interior issued January 12 Kootenai Tribe laws Management March 23 ment mineral mining rule National Forest National Mining Association Natural Resources NEPA October 30 Office of Ground Office of Water options plaintiffs plans postpone preliminary injunction procedures proposed rule public lands published regulations regulatory requirements revision road Roadless Area Conservation roadless rule rule's rulemaking process SDWA Secretary staff suspend tion Tribe of Idaho U.S. Department U.S. Environmental Protection U.S. Forest Service undue degradation USDA Veneman Washington Water and Drinking White House
Popular passages
Page 6 - ... a) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; b) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; c) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right...
Page 19 - No public forest reservation shall be established, except to improve and protect the forest within the reservation, or for the purpose of securing favorable conditions of water flows, and to furnish a continuous supply of timber for the use and necessities of citizens of the United States...
Page 15 - ... the land, with consideration being given to the relative values of the various resources, and not necessarily the combination of uses that will give the greatest dollar return or the greatest unit output. "(c) 'Sustained yield of the several products and services...
Page 15 - ... harmonious and coordinated management of the various resources, each with the other, without impairment of the productivity of the land, with consideration being given to the relative values of the various resources, and not necessarily the combination of uses that will give the greatest dollar return or the greatest unit output.
Page 6 - Act, which provides in part that the reviewing court shall hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be — (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law...
Page 6 - If Congress shall lay down by legislative act an intelligible principle to which the person or body authorized to fix such rates is directed to conform, such legislative action is not a forbidden delegation of legislative power.
Page 10 - Seeking public comment is impracticable, unnecessary and contrary to the public interest. The temporary 60-day delay in effective date is necessary to give Department officials the opportunity for further review and consideration of new regulations, consistent with the Assistant to the President's memorandum of January 20, 2001.
Page 15 - The management of all the various renewable surface resources of the national forests so that they are utilized in the combination that will best meet the needs of the American people; making the most judicious use of the land for some or all of these resources or related services over areas large enough to provide sufficient latitude for periodic adjustments in use to conform to changing needs and conditions; that some...
Page 2 - Government with particular reference to— (i) the effectiveness of present national security methods, staffing, and processes as tested against the requirements imposed by the rapidly mounting complexity of national security problems...
Page 10 - April 28. 2001 , was published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2001 (WIC: Food Delivery Systems: Delay of Effective Date, 66 FR 8885), in accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2001, from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff entitled "Regulatory Review Plan.