DOE/ESE security: how ready is the protective force : hearing before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, July 26, 2005, Volume 4

Front Cover

From inside the book

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 28 - BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY, EMERGING THREATS, AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS FOR RELEASE ON DELIVERY Tuesday, July 26, 2005 Good morning Mr.
Page 43 - Testimony Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives...
Page 88 - I would like to thank you and the committee for the opportunity to appear before you this morning, and I would be happy to answer any questions.
Page 28 - Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, this concludes my statement. I would be pleased to answer any questions that you or other members of the committee may have at this time.
Page 2 - I would ask unanimous consent that all members of the subcommittee be permitted to place any opening statement in the record and that the record remain open for 3 days for that purpose. Without objection, so ordered.
Page 12 - A key component of an effective program is the design basis threat (DBT), a classified document that identifies the potential size and capabilities of terrorist forces.
Page 10 - Office before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, US House of Representatives, February 10, 2004. US Public Diplomacy: State Department Expands Efforts But Faces Significant Challenges, Report of the US General Accountability Office to the Committee on International Relations, US House of Representatives, September 2003.
Page 14 - July 2005 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. In summary, we found the following: Protective forces at the five ESE sites containing Category I special nuclear material generally meet existing DOE readiness requirements.

Bibliographic information