C.C.; Tonigan, J.S.; and Anton, R. Assessment issues and strategies in alcoholism treatment matching research. J Stud Alcohol [Suppl] 12:92-100, 1994. Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979. Emrick, C.D.; Tonigan, J.S.; Montgomery, H.A.; and Little, L. Alcoholics Anonymous: What is currently known? In: McCrady, B.S., and Miller, W.R., eds. Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers Center for Alcohol Studies, 1993. Emrick, C.D. A review of psychologically oriented treatment of alcoholism: I. The use and interrelationships of outcome criteria and drinking behavior following treatment. QJ Stud Alcohol 35:523-549, 1974. Erhman, R.N., and Robbins, S.J. Reliability and validity of 6-month timeline reports of cocaine and heroin use in a methadone population. J Consult Clin Psychol 62:843-850, 1994. Feragne, M.A.; Longabaugh, R.; and Stevenson, J.F. The Psychosocial Functioning Inventory. Eval Health Prof 6:25-48, 1983. Finney, J.W.; Moos, R.H.; and Brennan, P.L. The Drinking Problems Index: A measure to assess alcohol-related problems among older adults. J Subst Abuse 3:395-404, 1991. Finney, J.W.; Moos, R.H.; and Mewborn, C.R. Post treatment experiences and treatment out- Gilbert, F.S. Development of a "Steps Question- Cognitive and behavioral approaches to alco- Stefan, R.L. The characteristics of alcoholics frequently lost to followup. J Stud Alcohol 48:119-123, 1987. McLellan, A.T.; Luborsky, L.; Woody, G.E.; O'Brien, C.P.; and Kron, R. Are the "addictionrelated" problems of substance abusers really related? J Nerv Ment Dis 169:232-239, 1981. Miller, W.R.; Brown, J.M.; Simpson, T.S.; Handmaker, N.S.; Bien, T.H.; Luckie, L.F.; Montgomery, H.A.; Hester, R.K.; and Tonigan, J.S. What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment literature. In: Hester, R.K., and Miller, W.R., eds. Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches. 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1995a. Miller, W.R.; Lechman, A.L.; Delaney, H.D.; and Tinkcom, M. Long-term followup of behavioral self-control training. J Stud Alcohol 53:249-261, 1992. Miller, W.R.; Tonigan, J.S.; and Longabaugh, R. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An Instrument for Assessing Adverse Consequences of Alcohol Abuse. Test Manual. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 4. NIH Publication No. 95-3911. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995b. Ogborne, A.C., and Annis, H.M. The reactive effects of follow-up assessment procedures: An experimental study. Addictive Behaviors 13:123-129, 1988. Pedhazur, E.J. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1982. Sobell, L.C.; Sobell, M.B.; and Maisto, S.A. Followup attrition in alcohol treatment studies: Is "no news" bad news, good news or no news? Drug Alcohol Depend 13:1-7, 1984. Tonigan, J.S.; Toscova, R.; and Miller, W.R. Meta analysis of the Alcoholics Anonymous literature: Sample and study characteristics moderate findings. J Stud Alcohol in pressS. White, H.R., and Labouvie, E.W. Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.J Stud Alcohol 50:30-37, 1989. Wirtz, P.; Carbonari, J.P.; Muenz, L.R.; Stout, R.; Tonigan, J.S.; and Connors, G.J. Classical analytical methods for detecting matching effects on treatment outcome. J Stud Alcohol [Suppl] 12:76-82, 1994. Appendix Fact Sheets and Sample Instruments This section contains detailed information about each instrument that met the criteria for inclusion outlined in the introduction. Following each "fact sheet" is a sample of the instrument. Instrument users must be particularly sensitive to copyrights and must not copy or otherwise reproduce those measures so protected without explicit permission from the copyright holder. Adapted Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (ASMAST) for Fathers (F-SMAST) and Mothers (M-SMAST) The F-SMAST and M-SMAST are brief questionnaires that The F-SMAST and M-SMAST can be used to identify children of alcoholics for both clinical and research purposes. Clinical Utility of The F-SMAST and M-SMAST are well validated, brief pencil and paper instruments for assessing parental history of alcoholism. Research Applicability The F-SMAST and M-SMAST are useful research tools with good psychometric properties. They can be used to assess parental history of alcoholism in either clinical or research settings. Copyright, Cost, and No copyright. The F-SMAST and M-SMAST are adapted from the OSMAST with permission from the Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36:117-126, 1975. Copyright by Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Inc., Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08903. No cost. A copy of the F-SMAST and M-SMAST and an SAS program to provide scoring information may be obtained by addressing correspondence to: Kenneth J. Sher, Ph.D. Psychology Department 210 McAlester Hall University of Missouri - Columbia Source Reference Supporting Crews, T.M., and Sher, K.J. Using adapted short MASTs for assessing parental alcoholism: Reliability and validity. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res 16:576-584, 1992. Sher, K.J., and Descutner, C. Reports of parental alcoholism: Reliability across siblings. Addict Behav 11:25-30, 1986. Kushner, M.G., and Sher, K.J. Comorbidity of alcohol and anxiety disorders among college students: Effects of gender and family history of alcoholism. Addict Behav 18:543-552, 1993. Martin, E.D., and Sher, K.J. Family history of alcoholism, alcohol use disorders and the five factor model of personality. J Stud Alcohol 55:81-90, 1994. |