The Yearbook of the United States Brewers' AssociationUnited States Brewers Association., 1916 "List of members of the United States brewers' association", and "A list of brewers' associations in the United States" are included in the issues for 1911-12. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 18
Page 1
... Michigan , Montana , Nebraska and South Dakota . It is not worth while spending any time in holding post - mortems over these elections , unless it be for the purpose of guiding our judgment as to the future . We know that logically we ...
... Michigan , Montana , Nebraska and South Dakota . It is not worth while spending any time in holding post - mortems over these elections , unless it be for the purpose of guiding our judgment as to the future . We know that logically we ...
Page 15
... Michigan . The State voted in favor of prohibition at the No- vember elections , the official returns being : Prohibition Against prohibition 353,378 284,754 68,624 Majority in favor of prohibition ....... The city of Detroit voted ...
... Michigan . The State voted in favor of prohibition at the No- vember elections , the official returns being : Prohibition Against prohibition 353,378 284,754 68,624 Majority in favor of prohibition ....... The city of Detroit voted ...
Page 66
... Michigan , and Wisconsin ; in 1855 in New Hampshire , New York , Delaware , Illinois , Iowa , and Nebraska . In 1851 in Missouri ; in 1853 in Georgia ; in 1854 in Maryland , Arkan- sas , Mississippi , and Texas ; in 1855 in California ...
... Michigan , and Wisconsin ; in 1855 in New Hampshire , New York , Delaware , Illinois , Iowa , and Nebraska . In 1851 in Missouri ; in 1853 in Georgia ; in 1854 in Maryland , Arkan- sas , Mississippi , and Texas ; in 1855 in California ...
Page 67
... Michigan the court divided on the submis- sion clauses of the prohibitory act of 1853 in People v . Collins , 3 Mich . 343 . injustice of such a plan is apparent . Even more 67 THE UNITED STATES BREWERS ' ASSOCIATION.
... Michigan the court divided on the submis- sion clauses of the prohibitory act of 1853 in People v . Collins , 3 Mich . 343 . injustice of such a plan is apparent . Even more 67 THE UNITED STATES BREWERS ' ASSOCIATION.
Page 190
... Michigan 231,499 48.6 685,109,000 114.3 Missouri 152,993 42.0 574,111,000 81.5 Ohio 446,934 45.I 1,437,936,000 92.1 Oregon 28,750 98.8 93,005,000 145.2 Utah 11,785 117.7 61,989,000 244.7 Washington 69,120 119.3 220,746,000 211.7 ...
... Michigan 231,499 48.6 685,109,000 114.3 Missouri 152,993 42.0 574,111,000 81.5 Ohio 446,934 45.I 1,437,936,000 92.1 Oregon 28,750 98.8 93,005,000 145.2 Utah 11,785 117.7 61,989,000 244.7 Washington 69,120 119.3 220,746,000 211.7 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
absinth adopted alcoholic beverages amendment Anti-Saloon League Barrels beer bill brewers cause cent of alcohol citizen civilization compensation Congress Constitution consumption crime criminals Dakota dealers decision distilled districts drink effect election enacted ended June 30 enforce evil fact favor Federal fermented fermented liquors Fiscal Gallons Value Gallons Government hibition important increase interest interstate commerce intoxicants intoxicating liquors June 30 Justice Kansas legislation Legislature liquor traffic local option majority malt liquors manufacture and sale ment mental disease Mississippi moral municipal national prohibition opinion option laws police power population problem prohibition law prohibitionists prohibitory laws pulque Puritanism question regulations result retail revenue sale of liquor saloon sell shipments social South Dakota spirits statistics Supreme Court temperance Tennessee thing tion towns trade United Value Gallons Value Value Qts voters wages Webb-Kenyon Act Webb-Kenyon Law West Virginia whiskey wine York
Popular passages
Page 76 - The liberty mentioned in that amendment means not only the right of the citizen to be free from the mere physical restraint of his person, as by incarceration, but the term is deemed to embrace the right of the citizen to be free in the enjoyment of all his faculties; to be free to use them in all lawful ways; to live and work where he will; to earn his livelihood by any lawful calling; to pursue any livelihood or avocation, and for that purpose to enter into all contracts which may be proper, necessary...
Page 302 - ... intended, by any person interested therein, to be received, possessed, sold, or in any manner used, either in the original package or otherwise, in violation of any law of such State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, is hereby prohibited.
Page 70 - Amendment; but they are secured by way of prohibition against State laws and State proceedings affecting those rights and privileges, and by power given to Congress to legislate for the purpose of carrying such prohibition into effect...
Page 308 - And while, by virtue of its jurisdiction over persons and property within its limits, a State may provide for the security of the lives, limbs, health and comfort of persons and the protection of property so situated, yet a subject matter which has been confided exclusively to Congress by the Constitution is not within the jurisdiction of the police power of the State, unless placed there by congressional action.
Page 301 - That court — considering that the tax laid was not an impost on "exports," nor an interference with the power of Congress "to regulate commerce among the several States"— decided against the right thus set up under the Federal Constitution.
Page 74 - A prohibition simply upon the use of property for purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit.
Page 76 - There is no inherent right in a citizen to thus sell intoxicating liquors by retail; it is not a privilege of a citizen of the state or of a citizen of the United States.
Page 304 - Wilson act ; that is to say, its purpose was to prevent the immunity characteristic of interstate commerce from being used to permit the receipt of liquor through such commerce in states contrary to their laws, and thus in effect afford a means by subterfuge and indirection to set such laws at naught.
Page 301 - That the shipment or transportation, in any manner or by any means whatsoever, of any spirituous, vinous, malted, fermented, or other intoxicating liquor of any kind, from one State, Territory or District of the United States, or place non-contiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof...
Page 308 - Hence, inasmuch as interstate commerce, consisting in the transportation, purchase, sale, and exchange of commodities, is national in its character, and must be governed by a uniform system, so long as Congress does not pass any law to regulate it, or allowing the states so to do, it thereby indicates its will that such commerce shall be free and untrammeled.