Federal Assistance for Community Services Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Public Assistance of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, Second Session on H.R. 12175 ... May 21 and June 11, 1976U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976 - 150 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 50
Page 3
... going into effect . The result was a stalemate serving the interests of no one . To re- solve the matter , some Members of the Congress began advocating a type of special revenue sharing for social services . Concurrently , the ...
... going into effect . The result was a stalemate serving the interests of no one . To re- solve the matter , some Members of the Congress began advocating a type of special revenue sharing for social services . Concurrently , the ...
Page 8
... going into effect . A stalemate reulted , serving the interests of one one . To resolve the matter , some Members of the Congress began advocating a type of special revenue sharing for social services . Concurrently , the Department ...
... going into effect . A stalemate reulted , serving the interests of one one . To resolve the matter , some Members of the Congress began advocating a type of special revenue sharing for social services . Concurrently , the Department ...
Page 12
... going to relieve them of their mandatory responsibility , I think we have to anticipate that this reduction result in fewer dollars , too . We will try to develop this area as we move forward . Mr. Vander Jagt ? Mr. VANDER JAGT . I ...
... going to relieve them of their mandatory responsibility , I think we have to anticipate that this reduction result in fewer dollars , too . We will try to develop this area as we move forward . Mr. Vander Jagt ? Mr. VANDER JAGT . I ...
Page 13
... going on at present . It occurs to me and I have discussed this in the regional of- fices with our auditors - that surely there is some way to consolidate auditing at the Federal level so that we have one Federal approach to auditing ...
... going on at present . It occurs to me and I have discussed this in the regional of- fices with our auditors - that surely there is some way to consolidate auditing at the Federal level so that we have one Federal approach to auditing ...
Page 16
... So I could clarify a little further , the $ 101 million is constructed by going to the $ 2.5 billion ceiling , and then adding on top of it for the training . So that the difference is the difference between the total 16 41 113.
... So I could clarify a little further , the $ 101 million is constructed by going to the $ 2.5 billion ceiling , and then adding on top of it for the training . So that the difference is the difference between the total 16 41 113.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
$2.5 billion ceiling 75 percent administration administration's agencies American areas audit believe bill block grant proposal Bridgeport budget Chairman changes child committee concern CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Conn Connecticut CORMAN day care staffing Department dollars educational elderly eliminate expenditures Federal funds Federal Government FIDCR fiscal going Goodwill Industries group eligibility Guam income issue JENSEN June 11 KURZMAN legal services Legal Services Corporation legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Mailgram matching funds matching requirement medicaid million MORRILL National National Urban League North Dakota Older Americans Act planning process poverty line problems public assistance Puerto Rico question RANGEL ratios recipients regulations responsibility Secretary MATHEWS Section Social Security Act social services program staff staffing standards statement subcommittee SUZUKI targeting Thank tion title XX funds Title XX program title XX services Title XX training training funds training program VANDER JAGT Washington welfare
Popular passages
Page 28 - Total 1. Alabama... 2. Alaska 3. Arizona 4. Arkansas 5. California 6. Colorado 7. Connecticut 8. Delaware 9. District of Columbia , 10. Florida 11. Georgia 12. Hawaii 13. Idaho 14. Illinois 15. Indiana 16. Iowa 17. Kansas 18. Kentucky 19. Louisiana 20. Maine 21. Maryland 22. Massachusetts 23. Michigan.. 24. Minnesota 25. Mississippi 26. Missouri 27.
Page 30 - Maine 21 Maryland 22 Massachusetts 23 Michigan 24 Minnesota 25 Mississippi 26 Missouri 27 Montana 28 Nebraska 29 Nevada 30 New Hampshire 31 New Jersey 32 New Mexico 33 New York 34 North Carolina 35 North Dakota 36 Ohio 37 Oklahoma 38 Oregon 39 Pennsylvania 40 Rhode...
Page 15 - Location' (see page 1 of questionnaire) 1 Alabama 2 Alaska 3 Arizona 4 Arkansas 5 California 6 Colorado 7 Connecticut 8 Delaware 9 District of Columbia 10 Florida 11 Georgia 12 Hawaii 13 Idaho 14 Illinois 15 Indiana 16 Iowa 17 Kansas 18 Kentucky 19 Louisiana 20 Maine 21 Maryland 22 Massachusetts...
Page 30 - District of Columbia 10 Florida 11 Georgia 12 Hawaii 13 Idaho 14 Illinois 15 Indiana 16 Iowa 17 Kansas 18 Kentucky 19 Louisiana 20 Maine 21 Maryland 22 Massachusetts 23 Michigan 24 Minnesota 25 Mississippi 26 Missouri 27 Montana 28 Nebraska 29 Nevada 30 New Hampshire 31 New Jersey 32 New Mexico 33 New York 34 North Carolina 35 North Dakota 36 Ohio 37 Oklahoma 38...
Page 29 - Minnesota 25. Mississippi 26. Missouri 27. Montana 28. Nebraska 29. Nevada 30. New Hampshire 31. New Jersey 32. New Mexico 33. New York 34. North Carolina 35. North Dakota 36. Ohio 37. Oklahoma 38. Oregon 39. Pennsylvania 40. Rhode Island 41. South Carolina 42. South Dakota 43. Tennessee 44. Texas 45.
Page 28 - Illinois 15 — Indiana 16— Iowa 17 — Kansas 18— Kentucky 19 — Louisiana 20— Maine 21— Maryland 22 — Massachusetts 23— Michigan 24— Minnesota 25— Mississippi 26— Missouri 27— Montana 28 — Nebraska 29— Nevada 30— New Hampshire 31— New Jersey 32 — New Mexico 33— New York 34— North Carolina 35— North Dakota 36— Ohio 37 — Oklahoma 38 — Oregon 39— Pennsylvania 40— Rhode Island 41— South Carolina 42— South Dakota 43— Tennessee 44 — Texas...
Page 28 - Carolina 35. North Dakota 36. Ohio 37. Oklahoma 38. Oregon 39. Pennsylvania 40. Rhode Island 41. South Carolina 42. South Dakota 43. Tennessee 44, Texas 45. Utah 46. Vermont 47. Virginia 48. Washington 49. West Virginia 50.
Page 45 - Act is amended by striking out "and" after "areas" and inserting a comma in lieu thereof, and by inserting after "deprived persons," the following: "and of elderly persons,". (b) The second sentence of section 6(a) (20 USC 1505(a)) of such Act is amended by inserting before the period at the end thereof the following: ", and...
Page 66 - Agency Members, attached.) The Council is the official accrediting agency for all programs of social work education in the United States and is recognized as such by the United States Office of Education and the National Commission on Accrediting.
Page 66 - Council comprised of voluntary and public national, State and local social welfare agencies and related organizations, faculty members, and individuals concerned with social work education.