Federal Assistance for Community Services Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Public Assistance of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, Second Session on H.R. 12175 ... May 21 and June 11, 1976U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976 - 150 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 33
Page 3
... less rigorous procedure if the States involved have exercised the option to use a simple declaration of eligibility process granted in our April 2 regulatory amendments . To date there really has been no resolution of the 3.
... less rigorous procedure if the States involved have exercised the option to use a simple declaration of eligibility process granted in our April 2 regulatory amendments . To date there really has been no resolution of the 3.
Page 4
... amendments to H.R. 12455. This bill has the appearance of a " compromise " on the standards , but it is not , for it fails to address adequately the central issues outlined in the President's veto message on H.R. 9803. The new bill , as ...
... amendments to H.R. 12455. This bill has the appearance of a " compromise " on the standards , but it is not , for it fails to address adequately the central issues outlined in the President's veto message on H.R. 9803. The new bill , as ...
Page 5
... amendments also would provide , I believe , some $ 375 million over the next 17 months - the same amount pro- vided or presupposed in the vetoed H.R. 9803 . We have some problem with that . The logic of that escapes us . If these ...
... amendments also would provide , I believe , some $ 375 million over the next 17 months - the same amount pro- vided or presupposed in the vetoed H.R. 9803 . We have some problem with that . The logic of that escapes us . If these ...
Page 6
... amendments would breach the title XX limitation by adding hundreds of millions of dollars for the highly dubious purpose of potentially enforcing extremely controversial day care standards - and would pull along State and local 6.
... amendments would breach the title XX limitation by adding hundreds of millions of dollars for the highly dubious purpose of potentially enforcing extremely controversial day care standards - and would pull along State and local 6.
Page 7
... amendments to H.R. 12455 would take this program in quite the opposite direction in that they would elimi- nate entirely the concept of Federal eligibility limitations on services funded under title XX . If the Federal Government has ...
... amendments to H.R. 12455 would take this program in quite the opposite direction in that they would elimi- nate entirely the concept of Federal eligibility limitations on services funded under title XX . If the Federal Government has ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
$2.5 billion ceiling 75 percent administration administration's agencies American areas audit believe bill block grant proposal Bridgeport budget Chairman changes child committee concern CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Conn Connecticut CORMAN day care staffing Department dollars educational elderly eliminate expenditures Federal funds Federal Government FIDCR fiscal going Goodwill Industries group eligibility Guam income issue JENSEN June 11 KURZMAN legal services Legal Services Corporation legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Mailgram matching funds matching requirement medicaid million MORRILL National National Urban League North Dakota Older Americans Act planning process poverty line problems public assistance Puerto Rico question RANGEL ratios recipients regulations responsibility Secretary MATHEWS Section Social Security Act social services program staff staffing standards statement subcommittee SUZUKI targeting Thank tion title XX funds Title XX program title XX services Title XX training training funds training program VANDER JAGT Washington welfare
Popular passages
Page 28 - Total 1. Alabama... 2. Alaska 3. Arizona 4. Arkansas 5. California 6. Colorado 7. Connecticut 8. Delaware 9. District of Columbia , 10. Florida 11. Georgia 12. Hawaii 13. Idaho 14. Illinois 15. Indiana 16. Iowa 17. Kansas 18. Kentucky 19. Louisiana 20. Maine 21. Maryland 22. Massachusetts 23. Michigan.. 24. Minnesota 25. Mississippi 26. Missouri 27.
Page 30 - Maine 21 Maryland 22 Massachusetts 23 Michigan 24 Minnesota 25 Mississippi 26 Missouri 27 Montana 28 Nebraska 29 Nevada 30 New Hampshire 31 New Jersey 32 New Mexico 33 New York 34 North Carolina 35 North Dakota 36 Ohio 37 Oklahoma 38 Oregon 39 Pennsylvania 40 Rhode...
Page 15 - Location' (see page 1 of questionnaire) 1 Alabama 2 Alaska 3 Arizona 4 Arkansas 5 California 6 Colorado 7 Connecticut 8 Delaware 9 District of Columbia 10 Florida 11 Georgia 12 Hawaii 13 Idaho 14 Illinois 15 Indiana 16 Iowa 17 Kansas 18 Kentucky 19 Louisiana 20 Maine 21 Maryland 22 Massachusetts...
Page 30 - District of Columbia 10 Florida 11 Georgia 12 Hawaii 13 Idaho 14 Illinois 15 Indiana 16 Iowa 17 Kansas 18 Kentucky 19 Louisiana 20 Maine 21 Maryland 22 Massachusetts 23 Michigan 24 Minnesota 25 Mississippi 26 Missouri 27 Montana 28 Nebraska 29 Nevada 30 New Hampshire 31 New Jersey 32 New Mexico 33 New York 34 North Carolina 35 North Dakota 36 Ohio 37 Oklahoma 38...
Page 29 - Minnesota 25. Mississippi 26. Missouri 27. Montana 28. Nebraska 29. Nevada 30. New Hampshire 31. New Jersey 32. New Mexico 33. New York 34. North Carolina 35. North Dakota 36. Ohio 37. Oklahoma 38. Oregon 39. Pennsylvania 40. Rhode Island 41. South Carolina 42. South Dakota 43. Tennessee 44. Texas 45.
Page 28 - Illinois 15 — Indiana 16— Iowa 17 — Kansas 18— Kentucky 19 — Louisiana 20— Maine 21— Maryland 22 — Massachusetts 23— Michigan 24— Minnesota 25— Mississippi 26— Missouri 27— Montana 28 — Nebraska 29— Nevada 30— New Hampshire 31— New Jersey 32 — New Mexico 33— New York 34— North Carolina 35— North Dakota 36— Ohio 37 — Oklahoma 38 — Oregon 39— Pennsylvania 40— Rhode Island 41— South Carolina 42— South Dakota 43— Tennessee 44 — Texas...
Page 28 - Carolina 35. North Dakota 36. Ohio 37. Oklahoma 38. Oregon 39. Pennsylvania 40. Rhode Island 41. South Carolina 42. South Dakota 43. Tennessee 44, Texas 45. Utah 46. Vermont 47. Virginia 48. Washington 49. West Virginia 50.
Page 45 - Act is amended by striking out "and" after "areas" and inserting a comma in lieu thereof, and by inserting after "deprived persons," the following: "and of elderly persons,". (b) The second sentence of section 6(a) (20 USC 1505(a)) of such Act is amended by inserting before the period at the end thereof the following: ", and...
Page 66 - Agency Members, attached.) The Council is the official accrediting agency for all programs of social work education in the United States and is recognized as such by the United States Office of Education and the National Commission on Accrediting.
Page 66 - Council comprised of voluntary and public national, State and local social welfare agencies and related organizations, faculty members, and individuals concerned with social work education.